These Are the Judges Who Will Decide Whether House Dems Should Get Unredacted Mueller Report
Source: Law & Crime
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia will hear oral arguments next week on an effort by House Democrats to obtain the full and unredacted report by former special counsel Robert Muellerincluding still secret, closely-guarded grand jury materials.
Those discussions wont take place in front of the entire D.C. Court of Appeals, but will instead be overseen by a three-judge panel.
The panel system operates by way of the chief judges discretion. Here, that means Merrick Garland chose Neomi Rao, Thomas Griffith and Judith Rogers to deliberate and decide the next stage of the lawsuit aimed at forcing the release of Muellers entire report.
...
Rao was appointed by President Donald Trump in order to replace now-Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh earlier this year. A decided member of the conservative movement, Rao enraged judicial reform and womens rights advocates just by virtue of her nomination as Trumps hand-picked Kavanaugh successor.
Read more: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/these-are-the-judges-who-will-decide-whether-democrats-get-the-unredacted-mueller-report/
Mr.Bill
(24,274 posts)has the potential to send the House investigation back to square one. The only reason they would have to redact anything and not even let members of congress with the highest security clearances see it is it incriminates Trump, his family and his gang.
MissMillie
(38,546 posts)Merrick Garland chose the 3 judge panel... interesting.
I'm not implying Judge Garland has made his decision based on anything other than the qualifications of the judges... but you can BET your last dollar that if the panel rules in favor of House Democrats, the other side will raise a stink.
onenote
(42,685 posts)Under the rules of practice of the DC Circuit, the judges that make up a three-judge panel to hear the merits of a case are selected by the clerk of the court, not the Chief Judge. Anyone with any experience practicing before the DC Circuit knows this.
Rule X.B. Merits Panels.
The Clerk assigns the judges in panels of three to the sitting weeks for which they are available for an entire term. The Clerk attempts to pair each active judge with each other active judge an equal number of weeks during the year, insofar as availability permits. If a judge becomes unavailable, he or she may arrange to switch sitting dates with another judge. Depending on their availability, senior judges of this Court also serve on panels.
https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/home.nsf/Content/VL%20-%20RPP%20-%20Handbook%202006%20Rev%202007/$FILE/Handbook20181201.pdf
iluvtennis
(19,844 posts)Skittles
(153,141 posts)why is this even an issue
mountain grammy
(26,614 posts)Now we pay to see it.
Igel
(35,296 posts)Well, that and business and those who pay various fees and expenses and then there are the tariffs ...
Still, that includes the information that they developed for producing nuclear weapons. It includes the transcripts of all the negotiations with Iran over the agreement reached. It includes all cabinet meetings at which sensitive matters were discussed. It includes every single document Hillary Clinton produced while on the clock in the Obama administration and everything Eric Holder did. It includes the names and assignments of every CIA agent and informant.
Much of that is classified. Even Eric Holder refused to consent to a House subpoena for testimony and documents, back when fighting House subpoenas was a virtue and not an evil.
Why is this even an issue?
There may be a valid argument for releasing the full, unredacted report, but this isn't it. If it is, it applies to everything else I listed.
Skittles
(153,141 posts)Barr did - THAT'S why this is an issue