Ukraine opens probe into possible surveillance of former U.S. ambassador Marie Yovanovitch
Source: Washington Post
MOSCOW Ukrainian authorities announced a probe Thursday into possible surveillance of U.S. ambassador Marie Yovanovitch before she was dismissed from her post by the Trump administration.
The statement by Ukraines Interior Ministry followed the disclosure of new documents in the impeachment proceedings into President Trump. The material included exchanges between Lev Parnas, an associate of Trumps personal attorney Rudolph Giuliani, and others about the need to push Yovanovitch from her post.
The documents provided to the House Intelligence Committee by Parnas include messages with Robert Hyde, a Connecticut Republican who is running for Congress. In those exchanges, Parnas is informed about Yovanovitchs physical location.In an interview with MSNBC aired Wednesday, Parnas said he did not take Hydes claims seriously.
The Interior Ministry statement said Ukrainian police are not interfering in the internal political affairs of the United States.However, the published messages contain facts of possible violations of Ukrainian law and of the Vienna Convention on diplomatic relations, which protect the rights of diplomats on the territory of another state, the statement continued.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/ukraine-opens-probe-into-possible-surveillance-of-us-ambassador-yovanovitch/2020/01/16/a5ae3e82-3862-11ea-a1ff-c48c1d59a4a1_story.html
What a mess.
Original article -
Jan. 16, 2020 at 8:40 a.m. EST
The announcement follows the disclosure of new documents showing Lev Parnas, an associate of President Trumps personal attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani, discussing possible efforts to monitor the movements of Yovanovitch before she was removed from her post by the Trump administration.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/world/wp/2020/01/16/ukraine-opens-probe-into-possible-surveillance-of-former-u-s-ambassador-marie-yovanovitch/
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)t-rump and cronies made her uncomfortable.
mackdaddy
(1,527 posts)First thing that they could check easily would be what the Ambassador's calendar shows and if they match what Hyde was reporting. If Hyde was reporting her position accurately, then yes he was more than a drunk buffoon.
Even a drunk buffoon can hire some thugs if he has money, which he seems to have had.
By the way if the Ambassador had a cell phone with her, then her location is probably recorded exactly. Google sure knows where I am at all times, and has a complete record anytime I have my gps turned on.
BumRushDaShow
(129,109 posts)First thing I thought about when I first started reading your post. The "Find My Phone" thing and with government-issued phones, which I expect were specially-configured security-wise (the ones we were issued before I retired from the feds were specially-configured), there may have been other features available given she was overseas.
Maeve
(42,282 posts)Not the investigation tRump wanted (just what he deserved)
But then, their president is a comedian!
BumRushDaShow
(129,109 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)Good for them!
bucolic_frolic
(43,189 posts)Manufacturing dirt on Biden and possible natural gas deals
I doubt Democrats have much to fear even if Mitch calls both Biden's as witnesses because it would be pricking the bubble, which is to say it could not fester like Benghazi! or Emails! for months and months. It would be exoneration, but for Biden instead of Trump.
BumRushDaShow
(129,109 posts)And that last part was also the reason for Perry being one of the "3 Amigos".
Michael Warren
Rene Marsh-Profile-Image
By Michael Warren and Rene Marsh, CNN
Updated 4:09 PM ET, Thu October 17, 2019
Washington (CNN)In the months leading up to President Donald Trump's July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, multiple people associated with Trump, both inside and outside of his administration, were engaged in efforts to change leadership at Naftogaz, Ukraine's geopolitically important state-owned oil and gas company. One of those people, US Energy Secretary Rick Perry, faces a deadline Friday to comply with a congressional subpoena as part of the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
Questions about whether Trump offered to restore military aid in exchange for politically beneficial investigations in Ukraine have formed the basis of the impeachment inquiry. But the parallel attempts to influence Naftogaz further illustrate the nature of the Trump administration's interactions with Ukraine, in which statecraft and diplomacy appear to be mixed up with political and business interests and which are now the focus of a federal criminal investigation. The common thread in these attempted shakeups of Naftogaz is Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal attorney who has emerged as a central player in US-Ukraine relations.
Among those pushing for changes at Naftogaz was Perry. During his May trip to Kiev for Zelensky's inauguration, Perry delivered a list of four candidates to replace the existing American member of Naftogaz's international supervisory board, according to a source familiar with Perry's conversations. Two months earlier, Naftogaz was also in the crosshairs of two associates of Giuliani, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman. Parnas and Fruman were pushing a scheme at a major energy conference in Houston to replace Naftogaz's chief executive officer with someone who would be more beneficial to their own business interests, according to one American businessman informed of their efforts.
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/17/politics/parnas-fruman-perry-naftogaz/index.html
C Moon
(12,213 posts)So the GOP has something to point to.
bucolic_frolic
(43,189 posts)yeah, can't say the thought hasn't crossed the back of my mind
sheshe2
(83,791 posts)They are investigating corruption! 👍
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Clearly this was a subtle middle finger by the Ukrainian government to the Trump administration, telling them that they will be the ones who are in control of opening investigations, thank you very much.
Bayard
(22,100 posts)They've investigating this, and not the Bidens?! Its not fair! (stomp, stomp stomp)
duforsure
(11,885 posts)Then he'll have one of his goons threaten them in one way or another with suggestive actions they'll use against them if thy don't put out what trump wants them to put out for its findings. If Barr's involved he'll corrupt it for trump.
SCVDem
(5,103 posts)You wanted a trip to the White House.
Would you settle for a trip to Congress?
Fact witnesses don't get much bigger.