New York City State Of Emergency: De Blasio Says Schools And Mass Transit Will Stay Open
Source: Forbes
Topline: Following his declaration of a state of emergency in New York City on Thursday, Mayor Bill de Blasio reiterated that public schools and mass transit would remain open, even as Governor Andrew Cuomos indefinite statewide ban on public gatherings of 500 people or more goes into effect on Friday.
In a press conference on Thursday announcing the state of emergency order, de Blasio predicted that the coronavirus could easily be a six-month crisis, with the number of cases in the city projected to rise to 1,000 by next week.
With concerns over the outbreak escalating, droves of New Yorkers are abandoning crowded public transport, while M.T.A. officials on Friday denied rumors that the city was planning to shut down its subways and buses.
No. Period. Full Stop. Not happening, M.T.A. chairman Patrick Foye said in an interview with NY1. Its important to emphasize that the system is safe, he said, while also adding that the agency would ramp up cleaning efforts.
Read more: https://www.forbes.com/sites/sergeiklebnikov/2020/03/13/new-york-city-state-of-emergency-de-blasio-says-schools-and-mass-transit-will-stay-open/#922d4046af1d
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)It appears to be true so far that children don't get the virus nearly as badly but they can spread it.
Also, in a Facebook post yesterday, an Italian doctor reported that as the epidemic continued they were beginning to see more and more younger people, and he mentioned a patient in his late teens.
manhattan123
(302 posts)...is that a big percentage of NYC public school kids get their main meals of the day at school. And many have parents who can't afford to stay off work or afford care for their kids.
But I think the city is going to bow to the inevitable and cancel schools soon.
projectiboga
(53 posts)NYC is hard core about almost never canceling, only 10 canceled days total over past 50 years. 5 of those for ice storms and a few days for Hurricane Sandy over last ten years. I have heard that attendance during this time period won't affect High School application scores.
I'm considering keeping my 6th grader home next week. We are in Mid-Town-East in Manhattan NYC.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)they'll have no choice but to close the schools. Teachers can't teach classes half full and then play catch up when kids start returning.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)for this decision.
Polybius
(15,411 posts)He's term limited. And I don't think he's going to run again for higher office after his presidential campaign went nowhere.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)because a bunch of people could get sick and possibly die.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)For some in explicable reason, they want us to send our kids to school tomorrow in order to get the lesson plans or some kind of planning for the next few weeks (Schools are closed through March 30). On the one hand, I understand this. School aged children are a vanishingly small number of severe illness cases worldwide: .2% of severe illness, even with infections, and 0 deaths in children under 14 (it's actually remarkable!). The danger, of course, is that the children do get infected and can transmit the disease, even if it tends to affect children as a relatively mild cold.
So, it's weird to say "We're going to close schools for at least two weeks for social distancing, but we'll start that on Tuesday. Show up Monday as usual."
I honestly would have the slight suspicion that both my kids had this virus during the week of March 1. They were both sick with shortness of breath and coughs, but no sore throat, and my son had a fever (2 days). But it went away and they're both fine. Whatever it was that they had actually barely affected my daughter; she had a cough for one day and no fever that we could record, though she was fatigued for that day. Now, I say "suspicion" because I also don't believe this thing was circulating around our house without Mom and Dad catching it, so it might have been just a cold. But, boy, the timing and symptoms seemed right.