Exclusive: Justice Department reviews stock trades by lawmakers after coronavirus briefings
Source: CNN
The Justice Department has started to probe a series of stock transactions made by lawmakers ahead of the sharp market downturn stemming from the spread of coronavirus, according to two people familiar with the matter. The inquiry, which is still in its early stages and being done in coordination with the Securities and Exchange Commission, has so far included outreach from the FBI to at least one lawmaker, Sen. Richard Burr, seeking information about the trades, according to one of the sources. Public scrutiny of the lawmakers' market activity has centered on whether members of Congress sought to profit from the information they obtained in non-public briefings about the virus epidemic.
Burr, the North Carolina Republican who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, has previously said that he relied only on public news reports as he decided to sell between $628,000 and $1.7 million in stocks on February 13. Earlier this month, he asked the Senate Ethics Committee to review the trades given "the assumption many could make in hindsight," he said at the time. There's no indication that any of the sales, including Burr's, broke any laws or ran afoul of Senate rules. But the sales have come under fire after senators received closed-door briefings about the virus over the past several weeks before the market began trending downward. It is routine for the FBI and SEC to review stock trades when there is public question about their propriety.
In a statement Sunday to CNN, Alice Fisher, a lawyer for Burr, said that the senator "welcomes a thorough review of the facts in this matter, which will establish that his actions were appropriate." "The law is clear that any American -- including a Senator -- may participate in the stock market based on public information, as Senator Burr did. When this issue arose, Senator Burr immediately asked the Senate Ethics Committee to conduct a complete review, and he will cooperate with that review as well as any other appropriate inquiry," said Fisher, who led the Justice Department's criminal division under former President George W. Bush. Congress passed the Stock Act in 2012, which made it illegal for lawmakers to use inside information for financial benefit. Under insider trading laws, prosecutors would need to prove the lawmakers traded based on material non-public information they received in violation of a duty to keep it confidential.
Read more: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/29/politics/justice-stock-trades-lawmakers-coronavirus/
ck4829
(35,076 posts)lamp_shade
(14,831 posts)PSPS
(13,595 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)as it leads to Trump.
DENVERPOPS
(8,820 posts)who traded tens of millions the first day she and others secretly were informed. Reportedly, the investigators are still looking at her stuff, because many of her and her husband's trades are hidden in "ghost" corporations. And of all things, her husband is chairman of the NewYorkStockExchange !!!!!!!!?????????!!!!!!!!!!!
Barr is one of the most corrupt in the entire Trump/Republican administration, to say nothing of the Republicans on the Supreme Court.
Between the bunch of them, the republicans/Trump are bullet proof and have a teflon wall around each and everyone of them.....
doc03
(35,332 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)That's a joke, and after he and trump are gone they'll find I think it'll expose many members and people linked to this White House, family members like a sister and brother and kids. Munching should also be closely looked at with his wife. Trumps used others before for tax scams .
la-trucker
(283 posts)that it will take years to extract it
ancianita
(36,055 posts)Firestorm49
(4,035 posts)If they did what theyre accused of, they should be punished.
If lawmakers, lawyers, cabinet officials, or anybody ignores a subpoena, they should be punished.
If we have an emoluments clause is flaunted by an arrogant president, he should be punished.
If the president says hes not going to abide by laws passed in a bipartisan manner, he should be removed from office. I will have the final word on where the $500B is spent
How long do you want me to go on?
It seems that there are no repercussions any longer. During the impeachment process, minds much sharper than mine said that these things take time. It doesnt happen overnight. Just how long of a night are we talking about? Its now nearly a year since the fool was impeached and yet no one is being prosecuted for ignoring legally issued subpoenas. This burns my cork as much as having to listen to the Moron in Chief praise his asinine conduct daily.