Coronavirus job losses could total 47 million, unemployment rate may hit 32%, Fed estimates
Source: CNBC
Economists at the Feds St. Louis district project total employment reductions of 47 million, which would translate to a 32.1% unemployment rate, according to a recent analysis of how bad things could get.
The projections are even worse than St. Louis Fed President James Bullards much-publicized estimate of 30%. They reflect the high nature of at-risk jobs that ultimately could be lost to a government-induced economic freeze aimed at halting the coronavirus spread.
A record 3.3 million Americans filed initial jobless claims for the week ended March 21. Economists surveyed by Dow Jones expect another 2.65 million to join them this week.
During a CNBC interview last week, Bullard said the jobless number will be unparalleled, but dont get discouraged. This is a special quarter, and once the virus goes away and if we play our cards right and keep everything intact, then everyone will go back to work and everything will be fine.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/03/30/coronavirus-job-losses-could-total-47-million-unemployment-rate-of-32percent-fed-says.html
underpants
(182,788 posts)No worries.
at140
(6,110 posts)They don't even need paper and ink. Money is created electronically by borrowing from FED.
Igel
(35,300 posts)And there's no claim that in the event of a natural disaster, somebody else has to take a hit and not us.
If your mortgage is suspended, then that's gone. If you have no work-related expenses, ditto.
What's left are the actual day-to-day expenses. Food, basic transportation (but if you're locked down ...), utilities.
Now, rent, I don't know what's going on with that. It'll vary from city to city, I suspect.
Otherwise the $1200 should easily cover a month, and $500 for a dependent.
But keep in mind the other 70% (according to a really bad prediction, 70%) will still have their income. I've seen a lot of people saying how because of the epidemic they need far more money than $1200 in addition to their usual income and I continue to not follow their logic. If I didn't work at home, I'd need the same amount; working at home I'm saving an hour a day in travel and $30 in gasoline. Utilities will go up slightly, but not that much. (In fact, I'm saving more. I get out less, so it's harder to stop at the store to pick up snacks, some crap I don't need, or stop to eat out.)
Kali
(55,007 posts)insurance, medical bills to name a couple of other things people might be paying regularly on.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)LisaM
(27,806 posts)we got locked down earlier, and renters have it bad enough in this city to begin with (even as they are trying to force most of us to become renters, in a state where rent control is illegal).
PSPS
(13,594 posts)Gonna invest it in toilet paper. Should be sitt'n at the top of the pile in no time.
forthemiddle
(1,379 posts)Thanks to the Schumer (and Pelosi) push, unemployment insurance will now cover a vast majority of people.
In my case I have been furloughed until the crisis is over. In Indiana I will be receiving $390.00 a week for the State and an additional $600.00 from the Federal Government. I am under the impression that they will come together. That will be $990.00 a week. That will help tide me over until I can go back to work.
underpants
(182,788 posts)I was being snarky.
The unemployment supplement will go a long way.
Firestorm49
(4,032 posts)Lets hope that, in the event of very high numbers of unemployed, we dont see a rise in the crime rate here.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)some hard facts coming from a real source. Golly,you think Mnuchin's 30 million estimate was light in order to cover his ass? One of Obama's Economic Advisors said between 40 and 50 million will be the real numbers with only 20% rehires as things break open again.
sandensea
(21,627 posts)Except Hoover's heart was in the right place - but for his stick-in-the-mud conservatism that prevented him from taking bold action.
Cheeto's more like having Idi Amin in the middle of an all-out crisis.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)We had our first case of coronavirus case in late January. Now we have more than 150,000. Tease out that growth rate an additional 2 months and you'll see the destination.
We can only flatten the curve so much. I think the wave will be flatter, but extended.
sandensea
(21,627 posts)"Right, Herbie?"
Response to left-of-center2012 (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Magoo48
(4,708 posts)JCMach1
(27,556 posts)It's completely overwhelmed.
Thing is... If you have current benefits you have to login and claim them every two weeks. I also have no money for God knows how long because their website can't handle the traffic