Amid bipartisan criticism, Treasury Department attorneys review bank seizures of $1,200 stimulus
Source: Washington Post
The Treasury Department is reviewing whether it has the legal authority to prevent banks and private debt collectors from seizing $1,200 government stimulus payments, according to a person familiar with the internal deliberations, as blowback builds over private lenders clawing back parts of the emergency financial relief package.
The review is being conducted by legal counsel at the Treasury Department, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss agency process. It was unclear when a determination about the payments would be made.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration began directly depositing stimulus checks in the bank accounts of 80 million Americans to help them survive the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus. But reports quickly surfaced that some of these payments were being redirected to banks and private debt collectors from people who have overdraft fees, delinquent loans, or other debt obligations.
These garnishments have sparked a bipartisan backlash in Congress, with lawmakers arguing the money should be walled off from collection by banks and private debt collectors. Several large banks have also announced they would stop taking the money amid public criticism. USAA, which services veterans and military families, announced last week it would return the stimulus funds and change its policy after The American Prospect reported the bank took $3,400 in payments from the family of a disabled veteran to offset an existing debt.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/amid-bipartisan-criticism-treasury-department-attorneys-review-bank-seizures-of-dollar1200-stimulus-checks/ar-BB12VQM2
dont let them poor folk have no $$$
underpants
(182,788 posts)Or.....did they?
DENVERPOPS
(8,817 posts)that they thought that out, just like everything else they do......
Their real puzzle is how to make the checks out to only the RepubliCON poor people and not the Dem poor.......
I'm sure they could write a quick program comparing the list of people who are to receive the checks, and cancelling out any names that are on the State's Democrat voting registry......
I guess I shouldn't give them any ideas.
EleanorR
(2,391 posts)They knew this was going to happen and did nothing.
cstanleytech
(26,290 posts)claimed as dependants as there are a number of elderly and disabled that got screwed.
LiberalFighter
(50,912 posts)Along with the amounts involved.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)Do they do everything out of anger at libs and the poor?
CrispyQ
(36,461 posts)And when I read where some of the PPP money went I'm just as apocalyptic.
iluvtennis
(19,852 posts)DENVERPOPS
(8,817 posts)Debtor's prisons were a thing of the past, right?
Several Counties in Nebraska? or Kansas? practice this in their counties.
If a medical bill isn't paid, the hospital or Dr refers it to a private collection agency and they can go after the person thru the local courts which throws the person in Jail until they pay the bill.......
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)We could imagine something so much saner.
MarcA
(2,195 posts)it would be surprising if anything is done.
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)because banks and other such institutions are rarely capable of being compassionate. Libertarians will say that's how it should be, but then at the same say there should be no regulations. I can't wrap my head around their thought processes.