Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:15 PM Apr 2020

Amid bipartisan criticism, Treasury Department attorneys review bank seizures of $1,200 stimulus

Source: Washington Post


The Treasury Department is reviewing whether it has the legal authority to prevent banks and private debt collectors from seizing $1,200 government stimulus payments, according to a person familiar with the internal deliberations, as blowback builds over private lenders clawing back parts of the emergency financial relief package.
The review is being conducted by legal counsel at the Treasury Department, said the person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss agency process. It was unclear when a determination about the payments would be made.

Earlier this month, the Trump administration began directly depositing stimulus checks in the bank accounts of 80 million Americans to help them survive the economic downturn caused by the coronavirus. But reports quickly surfaced that some of these payments were being redirected to banks and private debt collectors from people who have overdraft fees, delinquent loans, or other debt obligations.

These garnishments have sparked a bipartisan backlash in Congress, with lawmakers arguing the money should be walled off from collection by banks and private debt collectors. Several large banks have also announced they would stop taking the money amid public criticism. USAA, which services veterans and military families, announced last week it would return the stimulus funds and change its policy after The American Prospect reported the bank took $3,400 in payments from the family of a disabled veteran to offset an existing debt.

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/amid-bipartisan-criticism-treasury-department-attorneys-review-bank-seizures-of-dollar1200-stimulus-checks/ar-BB12VQM2



dont let them poor folk have no $$$
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amid bipartisan criticism, Treasury Department attorneys review bank seizures of $1,200 stimulus (Original Post) Cryptoad Apr 2020 OP
Wow. Didn't think that one out did they? underpants Apr 2020 #1
I suspect DENVERPOPS Apr 2020 #5
Treasury was warned weeks ago EleanorR Apr 2020 #11
They should also look at the ones that got shafted from getting any money due to being cstanleytech Apr 2020 #2
The banks and companies need to be identified. LiberalFighter Apr 2020 #3
Seizure-for-payoff upends the whole purpose of the payments as Stimulus bucolic_frolic Apr 2020 #4
I have no fucking words at this inhumane confiscation of funds. CrispyQ Apr 2020 #6
Ditto.nt iluvtennis Apr 2020 #8
Hell, you'll love this DENVERPOPS Apr 2020 #9
It's time for capitalism to die off I_UndergroundPanther Apr 2020 #10
With the widespread Moral Bankruptcy of this Mammon worshiping Nation MarcA Apr 2020 #7
And this is why we need regulations Sapient Donkey Apr 2020 #12

DENVERPOPS

(8,817 posts)
5. I suspect
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:43 PM
Apr 2020

that they thought that out, just like everything else they do......

Their real puzzle is how to make the checks out to only the RepubliCON poor people and not the Dem poor.......

I'm sure they could write a quick program comparing the list of people who are to receive the checks, and cancelling out any names that are on the State's Democrat voting registry......

I guess I shouldn't give them any ideas.

EleanorR

(2,391 posts)
11. Treasury was warned weeks ago
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 09:12 PM
Apr 2020
Treasury was warned weeks ago about the potential danger of letting the payments be siphoned off. On April 9, Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) sent a joint letter to Mnuchin urging him to prevent the funds from going to private collectors settling prior debts.


They knew this was going to happen and did nothing.

cstanleytech

(26,290 posts)
2. They should also look at the ones that got shafted from getting any money due to being
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:20 PM
Apr 2020

claimed as dependants as there are a number of elderly and disabled that got screwed.

bucolic_frolic

(43,146 posts)
4. Seizure-for-payoff upends the whole purpose of the payments as Stimulus
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:30 PM
Apr 2020

Do they do everything out of anger at libs and the poor?

CrispyQ

(36,461 posts)
6. I have no fucking words at this inhumane confiscation of funds.
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:45 PM
Apr 2020


And when I read where some of the PPP money went I'm just as apocalyptic.

DENVERPOPS

(8,817 posts)
9. Hell, you'll love this
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 06:59 PM
Apr 2020

Debtor's prisons were a thing of the past, right?

Several Counties in Nebraska? or Kansas? practice this in their counties.
If a medical bill isn't paid, the hospital or Dr refers it to a private collection agency and they can go after the person thru the local courts which throws the person in Jail until they pay the bill.......

MarcA

(2,195 posts)
7. With the widespread Moral Bankruptcy of this Mammon worshiping Nation
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 03:48 PM
Apr 2020

it would be surprising if anything is done.

Sapient Donkey

(1,568 posts)
12. And this is why we need regulations
Tue Apr 21, 2020, 11:13 PM
Apr 2020

because banks and other such institutions are rarely capable of being compassionate. Libertarians will say that's how it should be, but then at the same say there should be no regulations. I can't wrap my head around their thought processes.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Amid bipartisan criticism...