Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,647 posts)
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 05:35 PM Sep 2020

Faith group deletes mentions of Barrett from its website

Source: Associated Press

Faith group deletes mentions of Barrett from its website
By MICHAEL BIESECKER
today

WASHINGTON (AP) — A religious organization tied to Amy Coney Barrett, President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, sought to erase all mentions and photos of her from its website before she meets with lawmakers and faces questions at her Senate confirmation hearings. ... Barrett, a federal appeals judge, has declined to publicly discuss her decades-long affiliation with People of Praise, a charismatic Christian group that opposes abortion and holds that men are divinely ordained as the “head” of the family and faith. Former members have said the group’s leaders teach that wives must submit to the will of their husbands. A spokesman for the organization has declined to say whether the judge and her husband, Jesse M. Barrett, are members.

But an analysis by The Associated Press shows that People of Praise erased numerous records from its website during the summer of 2017 that referred to Barrett and included photos of her and her family. At the time, Barrett was on Trump’s short list for the high court seat that eventually went to Justice Brett Kavanaugh. ... Last week, when Barrett again emerged as a front-runner for the court, more articles, blog posts and photos disappeared. After an AP reporter emailed the group’s spokesman Wednesday about members of Jesse Barrett’s family, his mother’s name was deleted from the primary contact for the South Bend, Indiana, branch. All issues of the organization’s magazine, “Vine and Branches,” were also removed.

Sean Connolly, People of Praise’s spokesman, confirmed in an email that information was being wiped from the group’s website. ... “Recent changes to our website were made in consultation with members and nonmembers from around the country who raised concerns about their and their families’ privacy due to heightened media attention,” Connolly said.

The deletions come at a time when Barrett’s background is under intense scrutiny by senators who will soon vote on whether to approve a lifetime appointment to the nation’s highest court, and by women’s rights groups, religious organizations and voters who will try to determine how she might rule on crucial issues that are likely to come before the Court. ... The AP was able to track the deletions and access the missing information through the Internet Archive, a nonprofit group that has saved digital versions of more than 330 billion web pages since 1996. ... Barrett, 48, did not mention People of Praise in her 2017 or 2020 Senate judicial questionnaires, the most recent of which was released Tuesday. And a request to interview her made through the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago, where she currently serves as a judge, was declined.

{snip}

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/us-supreme-court-amy-coney-barrett-confirmation-hearings-archive-courts-78dc1bd9d1470c7ea1357f495a4da26b



Hat tip, Joe.My.God.

Catholic Sect Scrubs Mentions Of Amy Coney Barrett
September 30, 2020

https://www.joemygod.com/2020/09/catholic-sect-scrubs-mentions-of-amy-coney-barrett/
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

lapfog_1

(29,227 posts)
1. They fundamentally don't understand how the internet works
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 05:37 PM
Sep 2020

anything and everything posted to the internet is saved...

TomVilmer

(1,832 posts)
14. But pages are ONLY saved and public if somebody grabs them!
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 09:22 PM
Sep 2020

Most of the saved pages in the Wayback Machine are there because somebody asked for it.
Everybody can and should do this, whenever the see something which should not disappear!
Support this!
https://web.archive.org/

sdfernando

(4,947 posts)
6. So someone needs to ask her about her
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 05:45 PM
Sep 2020

membership in this sect (cult) at the Senate hearings. And when she declines to talk about they should follow up with “why aren’t you proud of you religious affiliations?”

MFGsunny

(2,356 posts)
7. "Truth crushed to earth shall rise again."
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 05:49 PM
Sep 2020

Especially in these days and times, do they know nothing about the ways of technology? Rhetorical question, obviously.

These people think bells can be unrung too. Oh, the stoopid burns.

Karma13612

(4,554 posts)
9. Newsweek had an article dtd 9-25-2020
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 06:54 PM
Sep 2020

Which is worth a read.

[link:https://www.newsweek.com/role-women-amy-coney-barrett-people-praise-1534033|

Hopefully the astute Senators will read these articles and get a perspective.

Things like HandMaid’s are mentioned.

Sorry, but if this nominee answers to her husband for decisions, then we need to interview him as well in terms of his influence on her court decisions.

This reeks of cult and has no place on our Supreme Court.


FakeNoose

(32,791 posts)
10. I wonder if there are any records of Judge Barrett's prior recusals?
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 06:59 PM
Sep 2020

How would we know she's prepared to recuse herself from certain cases, if it has never happened before now? I don't question participation in a Catholic religious group, it's certainly her right as a private citizen. However when that group has overt political activities and she's actively participating, or quietly supporting them, it has repercussions on her office as a federal appellate judge.

The fact that the POP group is erasing Judge Barrett's activities from their website does look a little suspicious.


keithbvadu2

(36,949 posts)
11. If privacy was a legitimate issue, she and they would not have put it on a publicly available websit
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 07:13 PM
Sep 2020

If privacy was a legitimate issue, she and they would not have put it on a publicly available website at all.

dobleremolque

(492 posts)
13. So, ask her during the confirmation hearing: if her "head" aka husband
Wed Sep 30, 2020, 09:15 PM
Sep 2020

orders her to rule a certain way on a case before the court, does she obey him or not?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Faith group deletes menti...