Louisville police officer sues Kenneth Walker, boyfriend of Breonna Taylor, for emotional distress,
Source: CBS News
An officer involved in the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor has filed a civil suit against the 26-year-old's boyfriend for emotional distress, assault and battery on the night she was killed. The lawsuit claims Louisville Sergeant Jonathan Mattingly experienced "severe trauma, mental anguish, and emotional distress" because of Kenneth Walker's actions on March 13.
Mattingly and two other officers entered Taylor's apartment early in the morning that day with a warrant in an attempt to carry out a drug investigation. Walker, a licensed gun owner who said he thought the officers were intruders, allegedly fired a shot that hit Mattingly in the leg. Police opened fire, killing Taylor. Taylor had no criminal record and no drugs were found.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/breonna-taylor-boyfriend-kenneth-walker-sued-by-louisville-police-sgt-jonathan-mattingly-for-emotional-distress-2020-10-29/
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)no_hypocrisy
(46,117 posts)Referred to as the "castle domain law," changes in state law in the summer of 2006 mean that a resident can almost always assume a person breaking into his or her home means to cause harm.
"If someone comes up on the dwelling or the premises, with the intent to commit a felony, the presumption (is) that they are there to cause death or serious bodily harm," Adams said. That "gives the owner, the person that is there, the presumptive right to use deadly physical force or physical force to repel any attacker or any invader."
https://www.wave3.com/story/7094977/ky-law-allows-use-of-deadly-force-to-protect-self-property/#:~:text=law%20allows%20use%20of%20deadly%20force%20to%20protect%20self%2C%20property,-September%2018%2C%202007&text=Referred%20to%20as%20the%20%22castle,home%20means%20to%20cause%20harm.
Bayard
(22,075 posts)I was not aware of the big change. Good to know.
Cartaphelius
(868 posts)presence and/or intent?
If they had, and the "boyfriend" fired on them. Then he
was responsible for the young lady's life.
no_hypocrisy
(46,117 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)For the same reason the police was cleared. Neither of them knew who was on the other side of the door.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)Since his emotional state is the issue it opens the door to all kinds of unpleasant questions about his personal life, career ...
marble falls
(57,097 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)Boy has history given him short shrift.
"Life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short."
Behind the Aegis
(53,959 posts)But given the entire situation, I think that was already obvious.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Not money.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,344 posts)Maybe someone tied to white supremacists, or to police unions. Wait, I'm being redundant.
Anyway, follow the money, it should lead to a motive for the suit.
not_the_one
(2,227 posts)The policeman needs to know that he has kicked a hornet's nest. And his fellow policemen need to understand that there are repercussions to hiding behind an illegitimate blue wall.
Above all they need to know "the times, they are achangin'". Dogs that DID hunt, may no longer...
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Thu Aug 4, 2022, 01:27 PM - Edit history (6)
Who are now $12M richer from the settlement they accepted so quickly (minus the lawyer's cut)? This could be Mattingly's way of getting a slice -- that is, maybe the ulterior motive to get them to come up with some "quick cash just to make the lawsuit "go away!"
rocktivity
barbtries
(28,798 posts)from the counter suit coming his way. i don't like his chances.
jeez. whoever that guy is he has no business working in LE
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Tue Oct 12, 2021, 05:49 PM - Edit history (2)
which their no-knock warrants (at least one of which contained Breonna's name and address) permitted them to do. But as a legal gun owner who did not know who was entering and who were entering without his or Breonna's consent, Walker had every right to defend himself. That's why the criminal charges against Walker were dismissed, duh dot com -- what makes Mattingly think he has a civil case?
rocktivity
Lucky Luciano
(11,257 posts)clayton72
(135 posts)intheflow
(28,476 posts)You entered the wrong apartment and killed this guy's girlfriend. Suck it up, Buttercup. You are trash and deserve no compensation for any emotional anguish after the fact that you helped kill an innocent person which led to massive protests. I absolutely cannot believe what a asshole this guy is.
irisblue
(32,980 posts)What a snowflake. tRumpflake too, no doubts about that.
stillcool
(32,626 posts)they don't seem to miss a day of proving exactly what and who they are.
Evolve Dammit
(16,736 posts)and is sued by one of the cops who went to the wrong address (suspect of "investigation" already apprehended), fired into the apartment and into adjacent apartment(s) killing Breonna with at least eight (8) bullets that struck her?
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 26, 2021, 12:06 PM - Edit history (6)
Four search warrants had been approved, at least one of them was no-knock, and at least one of them contained Breonna's name and address. If they SHOULDN'T have been on the warrant, THAT'S legitimate grounds for civil (if not criminal) charges.
rocktivity
Evolve Dammit
(16,736 posts)58Sunliner
(4,386 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)SunSeeker
(51,563 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)Last edited Mon Oct 11, 2021, 12:20 PM - Edit history (3)
which is the legal way of saying, "This case is SO full of shit, it never should have been filed!"
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1138&pid=8765
EndlessWire
(6,536 posts)Take it to court and litigate all the ineptitude and callousness that such a suit will show. All the luck they had in avoiding charges against them gone. Maybe the boyfriend can bring a wrongful death countersuit and couple it with his own multiple-count suit of grievances. Then the jury can face palm their way to a boatload of cash for the bereaved family.
I just don't understand the thinking of this cop. He can dismiss his suit, but that doesn't mean they have to dismiss the countersuit. He's opened up a can of worms.