Gallup: Only 45% Of Republicans Believe In Science
Source: Crooks and Liars
7/16/21 2:52pm
Anti-reality has captured Republicans
In the latest Gallup poll survey, confidence has dropped in science from 70% overall to 64%.
But what has affected the six-percentage point drop the most has been the anti-intellectual, conspiracy theory-driven Republicans.
This has been coming since 1980, when the religious right was brought into the fold of the GOP, at first by Ralph Reed, the Young Republicans, and the Televangelist movement under Reagan.
It continued to grow and grow, and during George W. Bush years, the Terry Schiavo faux scandal blew up on right-wing media and was led by evangelicals and Randall Terry pro-life wackadoos who claimed Schiavo was alive and well when she was actually in a vegetative state.
.................................
.........................
Read more: https://crooksandliars.com/2021/07/gallup-only-45-republicans-believe-science
shocking, but not surprising.
A woman holding anti-COVID-19 vaccination sign displays it while listening to speakers during a protest on state capitol grounds on April 14, 2021 in Frankfort, Kentucky. Image from: Jon Cherry/Getty Images
@NumbersMuncher
Gallup: Confidence in science has dropped since 1975, with just 45% of Republicans having confidence in science compared to 72% in 1975.
It's easy to see why so many Republicans believe in conspiracy theories when they don't trust basic science that has been proven by evidence.
Link to tweet
?s=20
everyonematters
(3,435 posts)to believe it and believing something thru logical thinking.
AZ8theist
(5,515 posts)?1
Ziggysmom
(3,426 posts)He said the only poke shell ever get is from a vaccination.
Apologizing in advance for offending anyone. Its a serious problem, these morons.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)twodogsbarking
(9,844 posts)There are never enough hugs.
Or as Lenny Bruce said "There are never enough I love you's."
BumRushDaShow
(129,665 posts)This was Frothy Rick Santorum's finest moment, where he flew down to Florida to insert himself into what had become a fiasco, eventually resulting in a 17% re-election loss of his Senate seat here in PA, and leading to the ascension of current Senator Bob Casey, Jr.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,600 posts)-- Neil Degrasse Tyson
I wonder if the lady borrowed her pink sign from a pro-choice friend. I've heard similar sentiments expressed by so-called pro-life Repugs without a touch of irony.
Come to think of it, I wonder whether she even has any pro-choice friends.
not fooled
(5,803 posts)although it's sad we need it.
So many willful idiots.
And how convenient that as belief in science declines, corporate polluters get less pushback. It's almost as though that's an intended outcome.
csziggy
(34,139 posts)I do "believe" in the use of the scientific method - observation, testing, and verification. But blind belief in the system is not there.
bucolic_frolic
(43,364 posts)Republicans are always in your face
Borderer
(51 posts)...is also pro-choice when it comes to reproductive rights. Perhaps she is, but many of the anti-vaxers seem to be the same right wing morons who are normally very keen to pass laws restricting other peoples' choices. I doubt if they are bright enough to see the irony.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I'm not surprised at all that ONLY DEMOCRATS are smart.
FakeNoose
(32,823 posts)... to pollsters!
ProfessorGAC
(65,248 posts)21% of DEMOCRATS don't trust science. That number seems amazingly high.
And, in 1975 it was 33%.
This whole poll seems specious.
Walleye
(31,081 posts)Apollo Zeus
(251 posts)and religious people tend to favor GOP
https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/10/22/science-and-religion/
paleotn
(17,989 posts)Use to be religious types swung both ways, dependent on other factors like geography, economic status etc. Prior to Reagan, even the most ardent evangelical southerner was likely a Democrat and the most secular New Englander a Republican. Today, if someone is an evangelical or fundamentalist protestant or catholic, no matter where they are, it's nearly guaranteed they're a Republican. Part of the great reshuffle of American politics in the last 40 years.
Vinca
(50,318 posts)logosoco
(3,208 posts)Science is true whether or not you believe in it.
He also said something like the universe is under no obligation to make sense to you, and I guess that is the one i need to remember when i read stories like this! Because it does not make sense to me at all!
twodogsbarking
(9,844 posts)"Old white man" being key.
twodogsbarking
(9,844 posts)according to a Gallup poll.
ProfessorGAC
(65,248 posts)This poll smells funny, to me.
sinkingfeeling
(51,482 posts)mwb970
(11,367 posts)This treats science like a religion. Who would do that?
You can decide not to believe in Zoroastrianism. You cannot decide not to "believe in" gravity.
twodogsbarking
(9,844 posts)I don't think you can explain that to everyone though.
LiberalFighter
(51,170 posts)BadgerKid
(4,559 posts)Get off the grid already.
Lonestarblue
(10,106 posts)Or any other illness. Why do they think we have treatment for cancer anyway? No science involvedit just magically appeared! I suspect that they do believe in some science, but the first thought that pops into evangelical brains is that science equals evolution and therefore they dont believe in it.
somebody needs to point out to them that if they see a doctor, then they believe in science.
paleotn
(17,989 posts)LearnedHand
(3,394 posts)Critical thinking 101. Im not arguing there is no anti-intellectual problem, but for fucks sake, WHICH SCIENCE? Do the respondents have cell phones and work on computers? Do they drive cars and have electrical appliances? Do they fly in planes? Do they get annual checkups and X-rays? If so, they certainly forked over large money for science. Science is not a single monolithic thing. If were to understand the real implications of this sentiment, we need to understand exactly which science they dont believe in (whatever TF that even means). And people who report on these polls do our country a huge disservice by not digging deeper into the poll results. Democracy by sensationalist headlines really sucks.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,390 posts)but they hadn't included "science" for decades - maybe because it used to have a high rating, and hadn't seemed a political football, unlike things like "the police". Now they added it back into the list, and found it had plummeted in Republicans (and fallen a bit in independents).
No, asking the question, or reporting the poll results, do not "do great damage to all of us". It points to something that deserves greater study - such as whether it is specific sciences, or just a general "Science Is Bad" feeling they've cultivated. If you attack the first person to say "it looks like there's a problem", then you'll never fix the problem.
And this is not, of course, "democracy". No one ever said an opinion poll is "democracy".
malthaussen
(17,217 posts)Although quite a lot of modern technology is based on some sort of science or other.
-- Mal
Calista241
(5,586 posts)My fundie parents, who used to send me Trump shit daily, quarantined pretty religiously and were vaccinated early on. To this question they would have answered yes, but if the question was "do you think science has been politicized?" they would have also answered yes.
traitorsgalore
(1,396 posts)I'm sure 1/2 of their repuke respondents couldn't identify 1 single area of scientific study.
Mysterian
(4,597 posts)I stopped trying to figure out why and just accepted it.
PatrickforB
(14,595 posts)for ratings and profits than the republic, and a STUPID bunch of social media. And let's not forget REALITY TV, which definately caters to the lowest common denominator.
kimbutgar
(21,224 posts)malthaussen
(17,217 posts)The headline writer apparently sees no difference in the two.
-- Mal
DBoon
(22,403 posts)Imagined conspiracies call for an all powerful leader to crush the supposed conspiracy. The conspiracy cannot be proven false by definition, since any contrary evidence is just proof of a deeper conspiracy.
Elessar Zappa
(14,087 posts)ffr
(22,674 posts)Its not like evidentiary fact is debatable, like are religions and the belief that supernatural and natural worlds commingle, when by definition they cannot.
I don't believe in science either. But I trust scientific methods and results. It's what I base my whole world view upon and how I'm able to live my life in a consistent manner with nature and technology.
traitorsgalore
(1,396 posts)So using that logic, 55% of today R/Nazi party wouldn't make it through high school. What a culture, Rs worship stupidity and hatred of everything that benefits mankind.
Polybius
(15,510 posts)News stories usually refrain from calling people "pro-life wackadoos", even when true.
andym
(5,445 posts)to turn Daniel Patrick Moynihan's statement on its head:
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, just not his own facts."
Aristus
(66,478 posts)My standard response to anyone who says they "believe in God, not science"; I would tell them to go to the top of a 100-storey building, jump off, pray all the way down, and see what happens when they get to the bottom.
Stallion
(6,476 posts)raccoon
(31,128 posts)Science says there is a force of gravity. If they want to test that out, They can jump off a high building and see how that works for them.
I just saw that Aristus beat me to the post.
Kid Berwyn
(14,992 posts)USA USA USA!!!
ck4829
(35,094 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Today's Reptilian Party demands so many literally insane and internally contradictory beliefs from their followers. I don't see how anybody could possibly believe in any kind of recognizable reality (especially science), and still call themselves Reptilians.