3 fully vaccinated Texas Democrats in Washington, D.C., test positive for Covid
Source: nbc news
"This is a sober reminder that Covid is still with us, and though vaccinations offer tremendous protection, we still must take necessary precautions," the group's caucus chairman said.
00:14 /03:10 July 17, 2021, 1:16 PM CDT / Updated July 17, 2021, 1:39 PM CDT
Three fully vaccinated members of the Texas House delegation in Washington, D.C., tested positive for Covid-19, the state's House Democratic Caucus said Saturday.
The first positive test result came Friday night, when a member informed the caucus they had the coronavirus.
"Caucus Members and staff took a rapid test, all of which were negative," the caucus said in a statement.
But two additional fully vaccinated members reported positive test results Saturday morning. The names of the three people have not been released.
The caucus said it will follow current guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that state fully vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus do not need to take any extra precautions unless they start to show symptoms.
"The House Democratic Caucus is following all CDC guidance and protocols," Chairman Chris Turner said in a statement..................................
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/3-fully-vaccinated-texas-delegation-members-test-positive-covid-n1274278?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma
Lordy lordy. I do hope all will be OK. --and hoping the people they came in contact with will be OK also.
Link to tweet
?s=20
**EDIT to insert statement from Texas Dems:
View this email in your browser
July 17, 2021
STATEMENT: Fully Vaccinated HDC Members Test Positive for COVID
https://mailchi.mp/796bcaecf08e/failure-to-lead-refusing-medicaid-expansion-1675011?e=d906063289
(WASHINGTON D.C.) Friday night, a Member of the Texas House Democratic Caucus tested positive for COVID. The Member, who is fully vaccinated, immediately informed the caucus. Caucus Members and staff took a rapid test, all of which were negative. The caucus also consulted current CDC guidance, which says that fully vaccinated people who had been exposed to someone who tested positive do not need to take any additional precautions unless they are showing symptoms.
Saturday morning, two additional Members, each of whom are also fully vaccinated, tested positive on a rapid test.
House Democratic Caucus Chairman Chris Turner issued the following statement:
The House Democratic Caucus is following all CDC guidance and protocols. This is a sober reminder that COVID is still with us, and though vaccinations offer tremendous protection, we still must take necessary precautions. We are in touch with public health experts in Texas to provide additional guidance. Our caucus will follow all recommendations from public health experts as we continue our work.
The HDC will, and ask others to, respect the privacy of Members and their personal health. The caucus will provide updates as warranted.
The following is the CDC guidance the HDC is currently following:
Fully vaccinated people with no COVID-like symptoms following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19.
Most fully vaccinated people with no COVID-like symptoms do not need to quarantine, be restricted from work, or be tested following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, as their risk of infection is low.
However, they should still monitor for symptoms of COVID-19 for 14 days following an exposure.
Exceptions where testing (but not quarantine) is still recommended following an exposure to someone with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 include:
Fully vaccinated residents and employees of correctional and detention facilities and homeless shelters.
###
The Texas House Democratic Caucus, which is composed of all Democrats in the Texas House, serves as the groups membership services and logistical arm, and works to support House Democrats with communications, policy, and legal resources. Chaired by Rep. Chris Turner (D Grand Prairie), the Caucus is focused on fighting for real solutions for all Texans.
For questions regarding the information in this release, please contact Phillip Martin, Executive Director for the Texas House Democratic Caucus, by email at philliptxhdc@gmail.com.
riversedge
(70,447 posts)DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)The three members infected of the delegation of 60, are 5 percent of the delegation--
roughly the expected failure rate of the vaccines, against the original virus...
I did think it troublesome, seeing the pictures of them on the airplane, just about everyone unmasked.
C Moon
(12,226 posts)Why so much focus on the vaccinated? They aren't the problem.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)we still need to protect ourselves with masks, obviously-- with all the unvaccinated running around without masks...
The unmasking came about too quickly-- and the vaccines are no more than 95% effective at preventing covid infection. With the new variants, it could be much less, we don't know yet, for sure... The figures on that coming out of Israel vs. delta are not encouraging.
TxGuitar
(4,218 posts)Masking does not prevent one from getting Covid- it prevents one from spreading it. 95% effectiveness at preventing serious illness is pretty damn high. We will wear masks when we are in high risk situations- such as waiting in lines, etc but not in our every day life. And we certainly won't be sitting on a plane- masked or unmasked! We do happen to live in a county in Texas that has a decent vaccination rate.
Dreampuff
(778 posts)So what will the far-right say now? God is raining down his Wrath on them for running away from their duties to enact crazy voting laws? Or is the correct word,"Reigning?"
Skittles
(153,307 posts)KEEP MASKING, PEOPLE
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)And even then, it's not 100% effective. See S. Korea and Australia.
LisaL
(44,982 posts)Ever heard of N95s?
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)where everyone wears the correct mask in the correct infection.
And.....given all of that, there were still several breakthrough infections among healthcare providers.
In sum, even in a setting where there's near universal compliance and everyone has the correct mask wearing them correctly, there are breakthrough infections.
Now, in a country where there's no chance of universal compliance, no chance that everyone will have the correct mask, and no chance that they will wear the mask correctly at all times, there will be much more breakthrough infections.
The Mouth
(3,171 posts)(tl/dr- 95 percent effective)
Masks, vaccines, isolating when sick.
A good mask is *necessary*, but not *sufficient*. And short of the highest biosecurity buildings, there's a non-zero chance of contageon.
The fact that nearly every entity and authority gets it wrong, in that a mask doesn't protect the *wearer*, but instead the people the wearer comes in contact with doesn't help either
LisaL
(44,982 posts)NT
Blues Heron
(5,952 posts)It did its job. And they do that. not sure what your conception of how the virus spreads Is, but Masks definitely protect the wearer.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)Other than N95 masks, the percentage of 'protection' may be below 50%. I recall reading that common 1-layer fabric masks may only provide protection to the user around 39%...
The best protection is to be vaccinated, AND continue to wear a good mask in public settings... and still isolate as much as possible.
I will still be avoiding restaurants, movie theaters, airplanes and any crowded public venues-- which is not really a hardship for me, since I stopped eating out much years ago, and tended toward isolation before there was any pandemic.
I am sorry for younger people who must be going crazy to socialize by now-- I can understand that problem, they just need to get vaccinated in greater numbers than they are doing (the immortality of youth..).
I thank God for the internet, for them and for me-- I'm sure it has lessened the desperation to congregate to a large extent. I am extremely isolated, but I have some good friends over the internet whom I spend time with almost daily-- so I don't feel nearly so isolated as I actually am.
I think we are in for another bad time, due to the unvaccinated and delta... but the vaccinated can reasonably expect to survive it. For the unvaccinated, it is a game of Russian roulette...
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)Japan is also seeing a surge in covid cases.
Please explain why the surge is happening.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)And because this delta variant is much more contagious.
Masks can prevent some of the spread, along with social distancing-- but they provide far, far less than 100% protection even if all people with whom you come into contact are also masked. That is why we needed vaccinations also.
However, vaccinations only provide up to 95% protection, according to the group testing of the manufacturerors. One can increase their level of protection by masking as well, and continuing to practice social distancing and frequent hand washing...
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)So, how can it increase your level of protection after vaccination?
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)Masks alone did not work 100% against the original virus, either, but they lessened your chances of being infected with it by some percentage.
The increased threats from the delta virus are, that
1) infected people are emitting a higher "virus load" through sneezing, coughing, breathing, speaking, singing, etc., than what happened with the original virus. A "higher virus load" means you are more likely to catch it if exposed by them. And..
2) those infected with the Delta variant are becoming infectious to others SOONER than from the original virus.
Bengus81
(6,938 posts)Much like a surgeon doesn't wear a mask to protect himself, he's protecting the patient. That's what the vaccine is supposed to do if fully vaccinated.
FBaggins
(26,789 posts)It merely helps.
Much like a surgeon doesn't wear a mask to protect himself, he's protecting the patient.
Except that he's protecting the patient from bacteria in his saliva. Not respiratory viruses (which is why it's a different type of mask).
enid602
(8,677 posts)Every time a vaccinated person shows up positive there is quite a bit of attention given by the media. The main thing to remember is that a whopping 99.8% of the people hospitalized in Los Angeles County during this new version of the pandemic are unvaccinated. Only 50% of LA County residents are fully vaccinated at this time, so all things being equal you would expect that 50% of hospitalizations are among the unvaccinated. But only .02 percent (2 out of every 1000) are unvaccinated.
C Moon
(12,226 posts)And then blaming them for not wearing a mask when they were told it was okay.
They were told it was okay, because the virus WAS under control, until the boneheaded tin-foil hat wearers brought us Delta.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)to achieving "herd immunity" yet-- and maybe cannot do it for years, thanks to the far-right turning this into a political issue...
Personally, I did not agree with the CDC guidance saying it was "ok for the vaccinated to go without masks"-- it was clearly a license for every unvaccinated mask-resister to take them off as well. That is why I keep mine on in public, even though I am fully vaccinated---
--- as were these Texas legislators who caught it.
vanlassie
(5,695 posts)LisaL
(44,982 posts)they (or at least one of them) were likely infected before they even got on the plane.
It takes 4-5 days for test to turn positive. First of them tested positive on Friday.
vanlassie
(5,695 posts)Jose Garcia
(2,612 posts)Blues Heron
(5,952 posts)herding cats
(19,569 posts)She's rock solid in her field. She's not sensational and highly respected. She's not about her brand at all. She's like Dr. Peter Hotez, in that respect. Public health and epidemiology are their lives. It's highly informative and based on the current assumed facts. Basically, delta may spread faster due to it being infectious sooner at much, much higher levels. Maybe? It's not peer reviewed yet. Grain of salt and all that. But, the more we know.
Hi, I don't think you know me. I'm immunocompromised, I'm in a study to see how people like me, truly high risk people post vaccine, respond with antibodies. I didn't do so well post two Moderna vaccines, but apparently I'm doing better with a J&J booster. Kind of, maybe? Time will tell. I hope I help other people like me who are now all living a terrifying reality. This is extremely personal to me and facts are my lifeblood at this moment. I know I may seem harsh, but this is literally my life, and the life of others like me, I'm fighting for here. I've literally had people here tell me I was lucky to have the medical care I'm currently have... um, I'm highly likely to die from this virus and am (most definitely) lucky to be in this study, but it came with life threatening risks at the point I joined it.
I'm a huge fan of follow the verifiable science and ignore the background noise for a reason.
I may well be masking and social distancing for the rest of my life if people mistakenly assume vaccines don't make a big enough difference and continue to forego them. That's how we reach herd immunity and make people like me, people who are vaccinated and currently being hospitalized, safe.
Peace and love to you. I think you're reading me all wrong.
A new study by Li and colleagues is out on Virological that provides some insight:
Viral infection and transmission in a large well-traced outbreak caused by the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant
Viral infection and transmission in a large well-traced outbreak caused by the Delta SARS-CoV-2 variant Baisheng Li1,2#, Aiping Deng1,2#, Kuibiao Li3#, Yao Hu1,2#, Zhencui Li1,2#, Qianling Xiong1,2,4
https://virological.org/t/viral-infection-and-transmission-in-a-large-well-traced-outbreak-caused-by-the-delta-sars-cov-2-variant/724
There's been a lot of breathless news coverage about delta and it's mostly focused on increased transmissibility (and maybe pathogenicity).
VOCs aren't just inherently more transmissible (or more pathogenic). There must be a mechanism that underlies increased transmission.
Some hypothetical mechanisms include:
-Increased fitness (more shedding)
-Increased infectivity (better at infecting host cells ie tighter receptor binding)
-Longer period of contagion (shed virus for longer)
-Increased environmental stability (more tolerant to temp/humidity/etc)
This study attempted to address this in quarantined close contacts of confirmed cases. These people were tested daily by PCR, which allowed the investigators to determine the course of infection: longitudinal viral loads and time from exposure to positivity and symptoms.
The findings are quite striking. This shows that:
-People infected with delta test positive more quickly following exposure, suggesting more rapid viral growth.
-The viral loads (by PCR Ct) are 1000 times higher in delta when first detected.
This suggests that the delta incubation period is reduced compared to the prior viruses. Also, people infected with delta are shedding a shit-ton more virus than those from earlier variants.
This certainly explains delta's increased transmissibility.
If people are shedding 1000X more virus, the probability that a close contact will be exposed to an infectious dose is much higher.
If people become contagious more quickly after exposure, they can have more opportunity to infect others.
Now, I've also seen a lot of 🚨DELTA IS MORE AIRBORNE!!!!!1!!!🚨 commentary, which is neither helpful nor accurate. A virus is a physical structure that still has to obey the laws of physics. It can't become "more airborne"...and I'm not even sure what that means.
They also did some excellent molecular epidemiology as part of this study, and that was coupled with robust contact tracing and phylogenetic analysis. In this cohort, delta was transmitted both via direct contact & "indirect" transmission (most likely aerosols & not fomites).
So, delta is not more transmissible by the aerosol route than other variants. Primary modes of transmission continue to be a mix of inhaled aerosols and direct contact. Delta hasn't learned how to fly or morphed into an ACE2-seeking virus missile. It's not "more airborne."
This study suggests that the mechanism behind delta's increased transmissibility is just that there's a lot more of it, sooner. If there's more virus around, it's going to be easier to spread.
This is also consistent with the vaccine data that's been reported for delta.
Unvaccinated people are most vulnerable.
Partially vaccinated people are slightly less vulnerable but not robustly protected.
Fully vaccinated people are very protected.
Unvaccinated people have no defense against delta. It's easy for delta to gain a foothold with higher exposure.
Partially vaccinated people have low levels of neutralizing antibodies. It's easy for delta to overcome the antibodies they do have just by strength in numbers.
But fully vaccinated people have high titers of neutralizing antibodies and mature memory B and T cell responses. It's a lot harder for delta to overwhelm these defenses by just throwing more virus at them.
It also explains breakthrough infections. No vaccine is perfect, and a high enough dose of virus can overcome vaccine-induced defenses enough to cause an infection, though vaccine-induced immunity will limit disease severity in most cases.
All this suggests we can control delta with interventions we already have at our disposal:
-Get fully vaccinated
-Consider adding other interventions too, at least when spending time with people outside your household (mask, avoid crowds, limit gatherings, ventilate, etc)
Also I'm adding here that nothing is known about whether delta is more pathogenic. Despite observations that's the case, we should wait before coming to that conclusion. That was suggested for alpha based on epi data, but it wasn't borne out in animal models.
More transmissible VOCs may appear to be more pathogenic based on just infecting more people, who may be uniquely vulnerable. But I'm reserving judgment until I see mechanistic data demonstrating that a VOC has the means of producing more severe disease.
Also, let me add that despite op/eds arguing that higher doses mean more disease, there is very little evidence that dose correlates with disease severity, from both animal models and epi studies. I'll be surprised if delta is more pathogenic just because there's more of it.
My guess is that the route of transmission probably matters a lot more than dose, except at the extreme ends of the spectrum. But that remains among the many questions about delta that need to be addressed experimentally.
In short:
-Delta may be more transmissible because there's more of it, more quickly after exposure
-Vaccines still work against delta
-Taking other precautions (masks, distancing, limit crowds, stay outdoors, ventilation, hand washing, disinfection, etc) will further reduce risk.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1415672461111271424.html
LisaL
(44,982 posts)I hope we all can get boosted sooner rather than later.
herding cats
(19,569 posts)There's nothing definitive yet, sadly. The two vaccines work differently, and maybe this will be a boon for people like me who are falling ill from the virus now post vaccine and being hospitalized due to our medical conditions and faulty immune systems? It takes time to know how we react, and the science isn't in yet. I definitely want it to work! We will know down the road, but I'm hopeful for all of us. You healthy people, and every immunocompromised, terrified person like me, too.
Just get vaccinated people. (Not you). This is my message.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)due to unmasking, delta, and vaccine resisters...
Of course the carriers may have now spread it to other members of the delegation, with everyone unmasked on the planes, and possibly to national legislators in Washington.
I did not care much for that photo on the plane with everyone unmasked, even if they were all "fully-vaccinated"-- since the vaccine is not 100% effective... In a large group of people, it is predictable that up to 5% could still catch the original variants of covid, let alone the delta version...
LisaL
(44,982 posts)Also, one of them could have caught it in TX, and spread it to other two on the plane.
Would be interesting to see where the 3 now infected sat on the plane, close to each other?
From what I gathered, one was having symptoms and got tested on Friday.
The rest of the delegation started testing and two tested positive on Saturday (they were not symptomatic at the time).
TxGuitar
(4,218 posts)I thought the big flare-ups (hot spots) were Missouri, Arkansas, Louisiana, Alabama, Florida. But true, being unmasked on a plane is stupid for anyone -- vaccinated or not.
Skittles
(153,307 posts)C Moon
(12,226 posts)Yavin4
(35,455 posts)And now, he's playing in the NBA finals.
LisaL
(44,982 posts)But alas most will never play in NBA finals.
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)Or coaches for the Yankees? Now, the players for the Yankees?
I can find more examples of fully vaccinated people testing positive and being asymptomatic if you like.
LisaL
(44,982 posts)testing positive and then dying.
Not all members of TX delegation look to be as fit as professional athletes.
Name them. How many?
LisaL
(44,982 posts)"According to data updated Wednesday by the Illinois Department of Public Health, 151 people in Illinois have died due to COVID-19 or complications after being fully vaccinated. That figure equates to 2.2% of COVID-19 deaths in the state since Jan. 1, officials said."
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/coronavirus/151-dead-563-hospitalized-in-illinois-breakthrough-covid-cases/2556408/
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)What does "due to COVID-19 or complications" mean? Are there any other details on these 151? Like their age? Their general state of health? Do we know what vaccine they took? Do we know if they followed protocols?
LisaL
(44,982 posts)Do they all look like professional athletes?
I rest my case.
womanofthehills
(8,813 posts)Breakthrough case numbers are incredibly low and cases in which the person was hospitalized or died are even lower, the department said in a statement.
The cases included 303 people who were hospitalized and 79 who died, either in or out of the hospital, according to DPH data. Thats 0.0072 and 0.0019 percent, respectively, of the total vaccinated.
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2021/07/13/nation/state-says-number-covid-cases-vaccinated-people-is-incredibly-low/
AND:
151 Dead, 563 Hospitalized in Illinois Breakthrough COVID Cases
https://www.nbcchicago.com/news/coronavirus/151-dead-563-hospitalized-in-illinois-breakthrough-covid-cases/2556408/
Yavin4
(35,455 posts)That is what covid zero looks like, not zero positive tests.
Also from the article:
Finally, the media runs with the headlines without reporting any details about the 79 deaths, e.g. their age, their health status, the status of their immune system, nothing. Data not put into any context is propaganda designed to get the audience to feel a certain way.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,524 posts)Do you have those numbers ?
Jon King
(1,910 posts)By all means those with very serious health conditions should stay masked, as they should even without Covid during flu season. Those who die of the flu are almost always in poor health to begin with.
But the anti-vaxxers are using stuff like this to tell people not to get the vaccine, the opposite of what we want. I heard a guy at the tennis courts yesterday telling his friends "you get Covid even if you get the shot so why bother".
Fact is for almost all vaccinated people, a positive Covid test will not lead to any serious issues.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)to reverse its mask wearing mandate.
Initech
(100,145 posts)OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)56 went. So far that's like 5% vaccine escape. I doubt any get hospitalized. The stupid part is the photo. No masks on a plane. We know better.
LisaL
(44,982 posts)Two more tested positive on Sunday.
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,032 posts)marshall
(6,665 posts)That is 11% of the total number. One positive outcome is this has brought a possible mask mandate back to the public discussion.
inwiththenew
(972 posts)Their reason for leaving and the bill they were protesting has been eclipsed by the COVID outbreak. Let's hope that no one becomes seriously ill or that could be a PR nightmare.
clementine613
(561 posts)They forced the Democrats out of the state. They should have to pay criminally and civilly.