Sandy Power Outages Could Make Voting Impossible in 6+ States Where E-Voting is Only Option
Source: BRAD BLOG
Hurricane Sandy Power Outages Could Make Voting Impossible in Half a Dozen States Where Electronic Voting is Only Option for Voters
The National Weather Service has been telling us over the past several days that the serious impact of the super storm which is Hurricane Sandy is not to be underestimated. But there is another concern that has been keeping me awake over the past week or so.
NBC's Al Roker spelled out that concern briefly on Sunday's Meet the Press, explaining what I've been worrying about since it became clear that the storm could have serious ramifications on Election Day.
I'm not talking about the political ramifications about its effect on planned campaign events between now and Election Day, on Early Voting turnout, or even how it's handled by President Obama and FEMA, etc. I'm talking about the serious question of whether voters will be able to vote on Election Day at all, particularly in states which force voters to use electronic voting systems at the precincts.
"We expect massive power outages throughout the area," Roker told NBC's David Gregory (before Gregory hurried to ignore the comment entirely.) "As the system moves on shore it's going to be a long term effect. It's going to last for about 72 hours. And so we're talking about people who could be without power for at least 10 days. That, as you know, will take it right into Election Day. So what will people do if they can't get to the voting booth, or the voting booths don't have power?"
Good question, Al. And one we've warned about here for a number of years.
There are about a half a dozen states (listed below) directly in harm's way where voters are forced to use 100% unverifiable electronic voting systems on Election Day. In those locations, unless they have enough emergency paper ballots printed up to accommodate the entire electorate at precincts where power remains disrupted on Election Day, there could be very serious and unprecedented problems...
FULL STORY, LIST OF STATES WHERE E-VOTING THREATENED: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9670
Read more: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9670
tbennett76
(223 posts)ballots, worry about getting to election day first for those people
democrat_patriot
(2,774 posts)just sayin....
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)And, additionally, entire states won't be without power.
Thav
(946 posts)Hooked up and going in half a day, that'd get the printers going again.
If they were just using standard laser printers, you could do that off a portable gas generator..
liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)There is a priority to whose power they turn back on--obviously things like hospitals, police offices, firehouses get some concern, then schools, and middle level importance, and I'd suspect most voting machines are there.
Even so, these days they get the majority of the power back on (here in Mobile, AL at least) within a few days, and well into the 90 percentile by a week. So it probably won't be a problem.
IF they go to paper ballots, with some of the voting machines owned by Tagg's company, it might be a blessing in disguise.
thecrow
(5,519 posts)here in Virginia and she told me that if the power is out, they have ALREADY printed the paper ballots.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Blue Owl
(50,383 posts)n/t
EC
(12,287 posts)they made them on copy machines instead of making official ones. Besides the weight of paper and printing method shouldn't matter if they are not being read on electrical scanners anyway. They'll have to count by hand, so just make copies, what's the difference?
I wonder if there will be a shift in red to blue (or vice versa) if they end up voting by paper instead of machine. This should be interesting.
sunnystarr
(2,638 posts)and probably to print up ballots in other ways. How could this be done in time when the length and place of power outage is unknown until Election Day? Ballots could be printed and trucked in ahead of time. But you'd have to risk wasting that money in order to get the ballots there in time. Plus there would be no electricity in the polling stations making it at the least very difficult to read the ballots etc. once the sun goes down.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)It takes very little power to run a copier. A single 3500 watt gas generator (which 1 person can handle with a hand cart) could probably run 4 or 5 of them non stop without any stress.
Ditto with the lights. A strand of temporary contractor lights can be run off of a small portable generator and put in place within an hour. I was often hanging these strands up for new construction.
The materials are readily available, even during this storm.
reflection
(6,286 posts)and doesn't have a paper backup process in place, heads should roll. Even children know that sometimes the power goes out. There is no substitute for a piece of paper.
TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)My Spousal Unit works for a county Govt. They changed their building and inspections processes over to 100% electronic.
The new people who came in under the electronic system have never done any of the process or paperwork w/o computers. When the system went down for 2 weeks due to a bug in the system all of the newer people and quite a few of the oldsters were at a complete loss. There were no paper versions of the forms they needed to fill out on file. nothing. It was a train wreck.
IMHO there needs to always be a physical copy of any paper work needed and a SOP in a binder somewhere in the event that a power outage might last for longer than a week.
onecent
(6,096 posts)Angleae
(4,482 posts)TalkingDog
(9,001 posts)Hopefully
tblue
(16,350 posts)I do too. It's not that hard and it wouldn't take that long to print enough paper ballots.
jenw2
(374 posts)will keep the power off for a few extra days just to keep people from voting.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)PEPCO was taken to task for the extreme power outage during the June derecho that hit VA and MD. They were even called before Congress and their rate increase was denied because of their response.
The power companies will be (and already are) going out of their way to get a good mark on their long history of poor responses. They want that rate increase.
jenw2
(374 posts)Puget Sound Energy did the same after the big ice storm on December 14, 2006. PSE refused to bring in outside repair crews claiming they couldn't afford to. All they were doing was providing poor service to try to justify a huge rate hike. I was without power at home for over two weeks and out of work for nearly a month. PSE even left the local conservative paper without power. The PI argued against giving PSE more money for nothing in return so PSE shut them down for the first time in 75 (if I remember correctly) years of continuous publishing. Of course the conservatives have punished PSE for doing so, but as usual the poor public gets in the middle and suffers the most.
How much are the people in the NYC area going to suffer because of politics like this?
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)condoleeza
(814 posts)Don't know if there is any precedent set for this, but would HOPE that any States that this could affect, would qualify for their election voting/results to be extended a few days.
avebury
(10,952 posts)this involve?
siligut
(12,272 posts)North Carolina
Virginia
West Virginia
Maryland
Pennsylvania
New Jersey
A number of counties in Ohio, as well as most of Tennessee --- though neither state is quite as directly in the path of the worst of the storm --- also require voters to vote electronically on Election Day.
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)siligut
(12,272 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)Retrograde
(10,137 posts)Print ballots in the states that have power and ship them to the East Coast. It will take a couple of extra weeks to get them all counted, but it's a solution.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)They can be manufactured and distributed to polling locations fairly quickly. Hopefully this is already on the radar screen in locations that are likely to experience long-term power outages.
Twelve String
(38 posts)If the storm were happening next week I would be concerned. There is plenty of time to get power back and all the machines working.
progree
(10,908 posts)week or longer to restore. Power companies always deal with repairs that involve the most customers first, i.e. denser areas (blue areas generally), and take longer to deal with those in the boonies (redder areas generally) where you have many miles of lines serving only a few customers. So at least from that perspective, it might actually be good news. It will be interesting to see if it gets politicized -- which areas are being restored first.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)election delay, and MANY will notice (as well as their families around the US) the Other Candidate's smirky comments and awful reality about "privitization" of the disaster relief/FEMA.
And even if there is power on Election Day, who is going to rush down and try and vote...asuming there is a polling place still standing...under these circumstances. Then there is the situation of ID...how many birth certificates, passports, purses, wallets and other ID just washed out to sea. Hard to even print things out without an infrastructure.
Prayers for all.
Mz Pip
(27,445 posts)so this is new territory. I can only hope power can be restored quickly.
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)And, it shouldn't be.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Whole swaths of solidly Democratic areas are being devastated. The margins of victory are already slim. It will be the minorities and poor that get hurt worst of all from this storm, people will be more worried about dealing with their personal affairs than getting out to vote next tuesday. This is a terrible situation and could cause a state like PA to flip.
There should be at least some federal assitance to help those that will be disenfranchised because of the storm.
Don't you agree? or should we do nothing?
obamanut2012
(26,079 posts)It won't be delayed, and it shouldn't be. If the entire Mid Atlantic and NE was buried under six feet of snow, same thing. What if there was an earthquake in CA? You can't delay the election. It is against the law, for very obvious reasons.
If one is pragmatic and not compassionate about this natural disaster, it is obvious that difficulty in voting will help the Dems, not the GOP. No swing states are going to be affected (ie NC and VA), the blue states will still be blue, and probably even MORE blue if power or flooding messes up voting, because even in blue states, rural areas are quite red.
I also honestly don't think this will be the problem some think it will be. The Feds and governors are going to make sure people can vote, even Christie stated that, and he knows how NJ will be going.
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)IIRC, the New York State primary election was scheduled for Sept. 11, 2001. Wasn't that cancelled and rescheduled for a later date?
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)Delaying, say, the DNC - or canceling it altogether, for a wackier hypothetical - is one thing, but the actual general election can't simply be shuffled around.
toman911
(4 posts)The New York Primary wasn't mandated by the U.S, Constitution.
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)there are going to be some mighty powerful political/social/legal challenges...add to it the presence of the international UN poll watchers, and who knows. Another guess, but imagine if the state of California was rocked by a massive earthquake in populated areas on or near election day. We're in new territory. I don't see how any entity can declare a winner...which is required.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)and I have been told that the power is going to be down for days, the people are not going to be too enthused to go vote as they are in recovery mode from this disaster. This may hurt Obama since the city is solidly blue territory, maybe if the western part of PA gets heavy snow it will counteract the power outages in the city. Obama is only up by 7 or 8 in PA a problem like this could make the state appear to flip.
treestar
(82,383 posts)So they'll risk Rmoney winning- they will be in a state of needing federal aid. I'm sure they will appreciate it enough to go and vote.
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)Seriously, you don't understand what people are going through when disaster strikes? Not everyone is so committed to voting as you are, a lot of people are registered Democrats but if their house is flooded or they have not electricity or running water they aren't going to say, oh thats right today's the day I gotta drop all of my important life things here and makes sure somehow I get to my polling station (if it has power and they haven't moved me somewhere else).
I don't think you are appreciating the big picture.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Against R$ who would make it even worse for them - they'd have a direct example of how it could be worse.
Tab
(11,093 posts)You think?
pstokely
(10,528 posts)The sparsely populated rural areas will probably be the hardest to restore, they're also the most red
argiel1234
(390 posts)crucial information. Get. Rid. Of. Electronic. Voting.
Would anybody put money in a bank without getting a receipt?
Would anybody purchase a car or home without documentation?
Would anybody buy insurance without a written guarantee?
Then why the fuck in America do we vote on electronic machines owned by Republicans without any kind of verification or proof of vote?
libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Also, New York state, per a previous poster here, twice changed its primary because the date fell on Sept 11. I'm sure we'll know more in a day or so about the actual damage and fallout...political, social infrastructure, etc.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Rather than just speculate.