Who Is Behind QAnon? Linguistic Detectives Find Fingerprints
Source: New York Times
Sleuths hunting for the writer behind Q have increasingly overlooked Mr. Furber and focused their speculation on another QAnon booster: Ron Watkins, who operated a website where the Q messages began appearing in 2018 and is now running for Congress in Arizona. And the scientists say they found evidence to back up those suspicions as well. Mr. Watkins appears to have taken over from Mr. Furber at the beginning of 2018. Both deny writing as Q.
The studies provide the first empirical evidence of who invented the toxic QAnon myth, and the scientists who conducted the studies said they hoped that unmasking the creators might weaken its hold over QAnon followers. Some polls indicate that millions of people still believe that Q is a top military insider whose messages have revealed that former President Trump will save the world from a cabal of deep state Democratic pedophiles. QAnon has been linked to scores of violent incidents, many of the attackers who stormed the Capitol last year were adherents, and the F.B.I. has labeled the movement a potential terrorist threat.
The forensic analyses have not been previously reported. Two prominent experts in such linguistic detective work who reviewed the findings for The Times called the conclusions credible and persuasive.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/19/technology/qanon-messages-authors.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
KPN
(15,646 posts)via this kind of self-serving artifice would be criminally actionable. Are not posts on internet platforms traceable to their physical source?
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Creating social upheaval by writing things?
As odious a character as is Ron Watkins, I can think of a great many people who have caused social upheaval by writing things.
soldierant
(6,880 posts)always done so.
Is it possible to extradite a non-US-citizen, never physically present in the US, for causing havoc in the US by means of the internet?
L. Coyote
(51,129 posts)Mme. Defarge
(8,033 posts)Inquiring minds still want to know when TFG will be reinstated as POTUS.
oldsoftie
(12,548 posts)The Biden inauguration ws a fake. Etc Etc
yes, they really believe it. I live among them!
Mme. Defarge
(8,033 posts)Rural_Progressive
(1,105 posts)their belief that TFG is flying around in Air Force 1 calling the shots.
I also live among them. I love the beauty and the isolation where I live but many of the members of the community make rocks look smart.
bucolic_frolic
(43,168 posts)published under pseudonyms about finance, credit, QE, and everything financial. Years later I recall one was unmasked as senior exec in some major investment bank who said he simply wasn't authorized to actually id himself at the time. But you could tell all along this guy had good knowledge and inside dope that the public couldn't fund anywhere. I'm not suggesting he had anything to do with Q but am merely pointing out the technique was tested and did exist.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,319 posts)Warpy
(111,264 posts)is at https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n900531
Seems like an extradition of Paul Furber might be in order, I'll bet the FBI would love to chat with him.
I also think they whole thing was taken over by offshore bad actors some years ago, the clunky beginning morphing into a pretty slick psyops campaign, teasing people with half truths so they'd come to the wrhong conclusions. It worked astonishingly well, better than feeding them silly conspiracy theories outright.
nclib
(1,013 posts)orangecrush
(19,558 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)the idiots that wrote as Q and the idiots that follow them are the idiocracy of America.
erronis
(15,271 posts)We'll accept some minor deviations (nudges) from those we trust. Eventually those nudges can pivot around 180 degrees from our original course.
Witness a whole lot of religious or military indoctrination. Start with a fairly open-minded individual and end up with a fanatic/zealot.
The human brain/psyche is extremely malleable using good techniques.
hydrolastic
(488 posts)I now believe is a super passive way to tell people to fuck off. Here is why I think this. when you say "Everyone needs healthcare even the poor" they say "who's gunna pay for it" you say "the rich have the money we gave them they can easily pay for it" they start going off about the deficit. you say "that doesn't have anything to do with how healthcare is funded" they say "the immigrants will get on welfare and we will have to pay for them" then you say "there is no evidence for that" and then the say "there is no evidence for the moon Landing either!" you say "what does this have to do with healthcare?" they say "see its in the government interest to tell you the earth is round.. space is actually not real!' they just told me and every normal person to "fuck off" It's the same with Q
peppertree
(21,635 posts)StClone
(11,683 posts)Bucky
(54,013 posts)None of the cute following makes sense without three decades of insane bullshit being shoved down the audience's throat by Fox News and right wing radio charlatans like a Rush Limbaugh and all his imitators.
Joinfortmill
(14,425 posts)erronis
(15,271 posts)intrepidity
(7,302 posts)quite some time ago, where a similar analysis was done yielding similar conclusions. Would have to dig around a bit to find it though. Just saying this isn't as "new" as claimed.
The forensic analyses have not been previously reported. Two prominent experts in such linguistic detective work who reviewed the findings for The Times called the conclusions credible and persuasive.