Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,578 posts)
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 03:20 PM Feb 2022

Who Is Behind QAnon? Linguistic Detectives Find Fingerprints

Source: New York Times

Now two teams of forensic linguists say their analysis of the Q texts shows that Mr. Furber, one of the first online commentators to call attention to the earliest messages, actually played the lead role in writing them.

Sleuths hunting for the writer behind Q have increasingly overlooked Mr. Furber and focused their speculation on another QAnon booster: Ron Watkins, who operated a website where the Q messages began appearing in 2018 and is now running for Congress in Arizona. And the scientists say they found evidence to back up those suspicions as well. Mr. Watkins appears to have taken over from Mr. Furber at the beginning of 2018. Both deny writing as Q.

The studies provide the first empirical evidence of who invented the toxic QAnon myth, and the scientists who conducted the studies said they hoped that unmasking the creators might weaken its hold over QAnon followers. Some polls indicate that millions of people still believe that Q is a top military insider whose messages have revealed that former President Trump will save the world from a cabal of “deep state” Democratic pedophiles. QAnon has been linked to scores of violent incidents, many of the attackers who stormed the Capitol last year were adherents, and the F.B.I. has labeled the movement a potential terrorist threat.

The forensic analyses have not been previously reported. Two prominent experts in such linguistic detective work who reviewed the findings for The Times called the conclusions credible and persuasive.


Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/19/technology/qanon-messages-authors.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Who Is Behind QAnon? Linguistic Detectives Find Fingerprints (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2022 OP
I would think that intentionally creating social upheaval KPN Feb 2022 #1
The crime of Effete Snob Feb 2022 #3
Furber lives in South Africa, and appears to have soldierant Feb 2022 #21
Wasn't the Qanon identity "sold" by the original Q persona? L. Coyote Feb 2022 #2
Fascinating article! Mme. Defarge Feb 2022 #4
Many think he's STILL in charge. And the military is running things FOR him. oldsoftie Feb 2022 #8
Holy merde! Mme. Defarge Feb 2022 #13
Don't forget to include Rural_Progressive Feb 2022 #16
Early during the Great Recession, about 2009, there were well-written blogs bucolic_frolic Feb 2022 #5
For those without an NYT subscription, 'Furber' is Paul Furber from Johannesburg muriel_volestrangler Feb 2022 #6
A good article without a rabid paywall Warpy Feb 2022 #18
Thank you. nclib Feb 2022 #19
Q is anti democracy psyops. orangecrush Feb 2022 #7
Bingo Hekate Feb 2022 #9
Geez. Only whackjobs believe other whackjobs SouthernDem4ever Feb 2022 #10
Yes, that is the way we all work. We trust those that have viewpoints similar to our own. erronis Feb 2022 #15
I deal with these guys at work hydrolastic Feb 2022 #22
Mr. Furber and Mr. Watkins: Sounds like the silly - and ill-fated - villains in Diamonds are Forever peppertree Feb 2022 #11
Frank Drebin would be proud StClone Feb 2022 #20
More interesting: what gullible schmucks believe what Q writes? Bucky Feb 2022 #12
The whole rotten tale will soon emerge. Joinfortmill Feb 2022 #14
As long as we are the ones writing the history of these "interesting times". erronis Feb 2022 #17
I seem to recall reading something on Twitter intrepidity Feb 2022 #23

KPN

(15,646 posts)
1. I would think that intentionally creating social upheaval
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 03:27 PM
Feb 2022

via this kind of self-serving artifice would be criminally actionable. Are not posts on internet platforms traceable to their physical source?

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
3. The crime of
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 03:34 PM
Feb 2022

“Creating social upheaval by writing things”?

As odious a character as is Ron Watkins, I can think of a great many people who have caused social upheaval by writing things.

soldierant

(6,880 posts)
21. Furber lives in South Africa, and appears to have
Sun Feb 20, 2022, 12:07 AM
Feb 2022

always done so.

Is it possible to extradite a non-US-citizen, never physically present in the US, for causing havoc in the US by means of the internet?

oldsoftie

(12,548 posts)
8. Many think he's STILL in charge. And the military is running things FOR him.
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 04:43 PM
Feb 2022

The Biden inauguration ws a fake. Etc Etc

yes, they really believe it. I live among them!

Rural_Progressive

(1,105 posts)
16. Don't forget to include
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 06:10 PM
Feb 2022

their belief that TFG is flying around in Air Force 1 calling the shots.

I also live among them. I love the beauty and the isolation where I live but many of the members of the community make rocks look smart.

bucolic_frolic

(43,168 posts)
5. Early during the Great Recession, about 2009, there were well-written blogs
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 04:06 PM
Feb 2022

published under pseudonyms about finance, credit, QE, and everything financial. Years later I recall one was unmasked as senior exec in some major investment bank who said he simply wasn't authorized to actually id himself at the time. But you could tell all along this guy had good knowledge and inside dope that the public couldn't fund anywhere. I'm not suggesting he had anything to do with Q but am merely pointing out the technique was tested and did exist.

Warpy

(111,264 posts)
18. A good article without a rabid paywall
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 06:19 PM
Feb 2022

is at https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/how-three-conspiracy-theorists-took-q-sparked-qanon-n900531

Seems like an extradition of Paul Furber might be in order, I'll bet the FBI would love to chat with him.

I also think they whole thing was taken over by offshore bad actors some years ago, the clunky beginning morphing into a pretty slick psyops campaign, teasing people with half truths so they'd come to the wrhong conclusions. It worked astonishingly well, better than feeding them silly conspiracy theories outright.

SouthernDem4ever

(6,617 posts)
10. Geez. Only whackjobs believe other whackjobs
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 04:48 PM
Feb 2022

the idiots that wrote as Q and the idiots that follow them are the idiocracy of America.

erronis

(15,271 posts)
15. Yes, that is the way we all work. We trust those that have viewpoints similar to our own.
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 06:09 PM
Feb 2022

We'll accept some minor deviations (nudges) from those we trust. Eventually those nudges can pivot around 180 degrees from our original course.

Witness a whole lot of religious or military indoctrination. Start with a fairly open-minded individual and end up with a fanatic/zealot.

The human brain/psyche is extremely malleable using good techniques.

hydrolastic

(488 posts)
22. I deal with these guys at work
Sun Feb 20, 2022, 10:46 AM
Feb 2022

I now believe is a super passive way to tell people to fuck off. Here is why I think this. when you say "Everyone needs healthcare even the poor" they say "who's gunna pay for it" you say "the rich have the money we gave them they can easily pay for it" they start going off about the deficit. you say "that doesn't have anything to do with how healthcare is funded" they say "the immigrants will get on welfare and we will have to pay for them" then you say "there is no evidence for that" and then the say "there is no evidence for the moon Landing either!" you say "what does this have to do with healthcare?" they say "see its in the government interest to tell you the earth is round.. space is actually not real!' they just told me and every normal person to "fuck off" It's the same with Q

Bucky

(54,013 posts)
12. More interesting: what gullible schmucks believe what Q writes?
Sat Feb 19, 2022, 05:20 PM
Feb 2022

None of the cute following makes sense without three decades of insane bullshit being shoved down the audience's throat by Fox News and right wing radio charlatans like a Rush Limbaugh and all his imitators.

intrepidity

(7,302 posts)
23. I seem to recall reading something on Twitter
Sun Feb 20, 2022, 02:29 PM
Feb 2022

quite some time ago, where a similar analysis was done yielding similar conclusions. Would have to dig around a bit to find it though. Just saying this isn't as "new" as claimed.

The forensic analyses have not been previously reported. Two prominent experts in such linguistic detective work who reviewed the findings for The Times called the conclusions credible and persuasive.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Who Is Behind QAnon? Ling...