Sarah Bloom Raskin withdraws nomination to Fed board
Source: WaPo
Raskins path was all but doomed after Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee boycotted her confirmation vote and Sen. Joe Manchin said he opposed her.
Sarah Bloom Raskin, President Bidens pick for the Feds top banking regulator, withdrew her nomination on Tuesday, according to a source familiar with the process, after Republicans and one key Democrat opposed her confirmation.
Raskins nomination to the job of vice chair for supervision first came under pressure when GOP lawmakers came out against her, pointing to her focus on climate change and its threat to financial stability. But her candidacy was put in jeopardy after Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee boycotted her confirmation vote, raising questions about her time on the board of a Colorado payments firm that got access to a Fed payments systems during her tenure on the companys board.
On Monday, Sen. Joe Manchin III, a key Democratic vote, said he opposed Raskin because of her stance on energy in an era of inflation.
The New Yorker first reported news of Raskins withdrawal. Raskin did not immediately return a request for comment.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/03/15/sarah-bloom-raskin-fed-withdraw/
forgotmylogin
(7,539 posts)Because he gets to veto legislation for the entire country.
I was mad the same way when McConnell was majority leader and could pocket-veto by just not bringing legislation to the floor.
Rebl2
(13,574 posts)So sick of him🤬
yaesu
(8,020 posts)jalan48
(13,901 posts)Raskin wrote in a column last year that U.S. bank regulators must "leave their comfort zone" and begin regulating how financial institutions are contributing to the planetary emergency by funding fossil fuel emissions.
As Jane Mayer wrote in The New Yorker earlier this month, fossil fuel companies, fearing that at the Fed Raskin could identify the climate crisis as a long-term systemic risk to the economy and regulate accordingly, have led right-wing senators in their campaign to stop Raskin's confirmation:
The industry's fears were made clear at the end of January, when a coalition of forty-one energy-business trade associations that opposed Bloom Raskin's nomination wrote a letter to the committee in which they called Bloom Raskin "a strong advocate for debanking" fossil-fuel companies... In their letter, the associations called Bloom Raskin an environmental "alarmist" with "a crisis mentality" because she has stated that climate change could result in "an unlivably hot planet."
he U.S. Chamber of Commercewhich counts among its board members executives from natural gas company ConocoPhillips, a top contributor to Manchin this year, and other fossil fuel firmsalso wrote to the committee warning senators to reject Raskin.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/03/14/latest-climate-obstruction-manchin-refuses-support-sarah-bloom-raskin-fed
mountain grammy
(26,658 posts)File this one under "Nice Try" Joe.
Dr. T
(97 posts)not realize the financial implications of doing nothing to reverse climate change? Asking for a friend.
Irish_Dem
(47,514 posts)underpants
(182,947 posts)NotHardly
(1,062 posts)demmiblue
(36,903 posts)elleng
(131,193 posts)Samrob
(4,298 posts)Manchin is no friend and his wife has scant qualifications for anything compared to Raskin.
walkingman
(7,671 posts)seriously. I know they worship the fossil fuel industry but most people have children and grandchildren or at least nieces and nephews - is this the kind of world that you want to leave for them?
Surely the lily-white Christians are not that damn stupid?
LiberalLovinLug
(14,178 posts)This is only one small example of moments when Democrats seem so behind the times. AOC was right when she said something to the effect that Democratic communication is not effective in this social age.
These kinds of stories get lost after a day. Instead there should be a Dummies version of the key points about what exactly the Republicans are choosing for the American people. The ramifications of not apponting someone who would help stave of a climate disaster for their grandkids and instead finding someone more oil industry friendly bent on short term gain for his peers.
Pound these out, for every "small" story as well. I know it gets some press, on some networks, but not like a Lincoln project type campaign only that Democrats would control. One thing Republicans have learned in using The Big Lie theory how well that works. They now use it not just for things like "Trump actually won in 2020"...but all kinds of conspiracies. They flood the airwaves and netwaves with this every day, for everything.
We could use the same idea....only with truth bombs instead of lies.
Mr. Sparkle
(2,950 posts)They are a bunch of fossils
maxsolomon
(33,432 posts)We'll never address Climate Change at the Federal Level. Humans will never react to slow, looming crises - only immediate ones.
Time to dispense with the pretense that we care about the planet's future.