Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,903 posts)
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 03:43 PM Mar 2022

Sarah Bloom Raskin withdraws nomination to Fed board

Source: WaPo

Raskin’s path was all but doomed after Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee boycotted her confirmation vote and Sen. Joe Manchin said he opposed her.

Sarah Bloom Raskin, President Biden’s pick for the Fed’s top banking regulator, withdrew her nomination on Tuesday, according to a source familiar with the process, after Republicans and one key Democrat opposed her confirmation.

Raskin’s nomination to the job of vice chair for supervision first came under pressure when GOP lawmakers came out against her, pointing to her focus on climate change and its threat to financial stability. But her candidacy was put in jeopardy after Republicans on the Senate Banking Committee boycotted her confirmation vote, raising questions about her time on the board of a Colorado payments firm that got access to a Fed payments systems during her tenure on the company’s board.

On Monday, Sen. Joe Manchin III, a key Democratic vote, said he opposed Raskin because of her stance on energy in an era of inflation.

The New Yorker first reported news of Raskin’s withdrawal. Raskin did not immediately return a request for comment.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/03/15/sarah-bloom-raskin-fed-withdraw/

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sarah Bloom Raskin withdraws nomination to Fed board (Original Post) demmiblue Mar 2022 OP
So, Manchin is president now? forgotmylogin Mar 2022 #1
He thinks he is Rebl2 Mar 2022 #9
Well, Manchin got his weekly push to the front of the news line. nt yaesu Mar 2022 #2
The Owners of the USA said no. jalan48 Mar 2022 #3
Exactly! mountain grammy Mar 2022 #12
Uh, do these knuckleheads Dr. T Mar 2022 #4
The rich aren't going to pay for the cc damage. The taxpayer will have to pick up the tab. Irish_Dem Mar 2022 #6
One of my all time favorite cartoons underpants Mar 2022 #8
Tell me you're afraid of Black Women w/o telling me you aren't afraid of Black Women NotHardly Mar 2022 #5
Umm... demmiblue Mar 2022 #7
;-( elleng Mar 2022 #10
Sad. Didn't Biden appoint Manchin's wife to some cushy job. Wish he hadn't. Samrob Mar 2022 #11
I cannot understand why the American public doesn't take climate change walkingman Mar 2022 #13
Why don't the Democrats use this as a PR campaign? LiberalLovinLug Mar 2022 #16
All those Senators are bought by big oil and the coal lobby Mr. Sparkle Mar 2022 #14
Why we're doomed part 92,138,572,239,087,435 maxsolomon Mar 2022 #15

forgotmylogin

(7,539 posts)
1. So, Manchin is president now?
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 03:45 PM
Mar 2022

Because he gets to veto legislation for the entire country.

I was mad the same way when McConnell was majority leader and could pocket-veto by just not bringing legislation to the floor.

jalan48

(13,901 posts)
3. The Owners of the USA said no.
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 03:55 PM
Mar 2022

Raskin wrote in a column last year that U.S. bank regulators must "leave their comfort zone" and begin regulating how financial institutions are contributing to the planetary emergency by funding fossil fuel emissions.

As Jane Mayer wrote in The New Yorker earlier this month, fossil fuel companies, fearing that at the Fed Raskin could identify the climate crisis as a long-term systemic risk to the economy and regulate accordingly, have led right-wing senators in their campaign to stop Raskin's confirmation:

The industry's fears were made clear at the end of January, when a coalition of forty-one energy-business trade associations that opposed Bloom Raskin's nomination wrote a letter to the committee in which they called Bloom Raskin "a strong advocate for debanking" fossil-fuel companies... In their letter, the associations called Bloom Raskin an environmental "alarmist" with "a crisis mentality" because she has stated that climate change could result in "an unlivably hot planet."

he U.S. Chamber of Commerce—which counts among its board members executives from natural gas company ConocoPhillips, a top contributor to Manchin this year, and other fossil fuel firms—also wrote to the committee warning senators to reject Raskin.

https://www.commondreams.org/news/2022/03/14/latest-climate-obstruction-manchin-refuses-support-sarah-bloom-raskin-fed

Dr. T

(97 posts)
4. Uh, do these knuckleheads
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 04:00 PM
Mar 2022

not realize the financial implications of doing nothing to reverse climate change? Asking for a friend.

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
11. Sad. Didn't Biden appoint Manchin's wife to some cushy job. Wish he hadn't.
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 04:37 PM
Mar 2022

Manchin is no friend and his wife has scant qualifications for anything compared to Raskin.

walkingman

(7,671 posts)
13. I cannot understand why the American public doesn't take climate change
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 05:07 PM
Mar 2022

seriously. I know they worship the fossil fuel industry but most people have children and grandchildren or at least nieces and nephews - is this the kind of world that you want to leave for them?

Surely the lily-white Christians are not that damn stupid?

LiberalLovinLug

(14,178 posts)
16. Why don't the Democrats use this as a PR campaign?
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 06:04 PM
Mar 2022

This is only one small example of moments when Democrats seem so behind the times. AOC was right when she said something to the effect that Democratic communication is not effective in this social age.

These kinds of stories get lost after a day. Instead there should be a Dummies version of the key points about what exactly the Republicans are choosing for the American people. The ramifications of not apponting someone who would help stave of a climate disaster for their grandkids and instead finding someone more oil industry friendly bent on short term gain for his peers.

Pound these out, for every "small" story as well. I know it gets some press, on some networks, but not like a Lincoln project type campaign only that Democrats would control. One thing Republicans have learned in using The Big Lie theory how well that works. They now use it not just for things like "Trump actually won in 2020"...but all kinds of conspiracies. They flood the airwaves and netwaves with this every day, for everything.
We could use the same idea....only with truth bombs instead of lies.

maxsolomon

(33,432 posts)
15. Why we're doomed part 92,138,572,239,087,435
Tue Mar 15, 2022, 05:56 PM
Mar 2022

We'll never address Climate Change at the Federal Level. Humans will never react to slow, looming crises - only immediate ones.

Time to dispense with the pretense that we care about the planet's future.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sarah Bloom Raskin withdr...