Collins calls draft Roe opinion 'completely inconsistent' with what Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said .....
Source: CNN
Full Headline: Collins calls draft Roe opinion 'completely inconsistent' with what Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said during hearings and meetings
GOP Sen. Susan Collins said on Tuesday that a Supreme Court draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade published by Politico was "completely inconsistent" with what Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh "said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office."
"If this leaked draft opinion is the final decision and this reporting is accurate, it would be completely inconsistent with what Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh said in their hearings and in our meetings in my office," Collins said in a statement. "Obviously, we won't know each Justice's decision and reasoning until the Supreme Court officially announces its opinion in this case."
Asked if she was misled by Kavanaugh, Collins told CNN, "My statement speaks for itself."
[snip]
"I have always been concerned about preserving Roe v. Wade," Collins said then, adding that Kavanaugh had given her assurances during his confirmation process that the landmark opinion was safe.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/03/politics/susan-collins-reaction-kavanaugh-gorsuch/index.html
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,088 posts)That ship sailed a while ago...
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,062 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)Trust_Reality
(1,723 posts)Republicans have zero integrity.
elleng
(131,176 posts)CrispyQ
(36,533 posts)What you said.
Ray Bruns
(4,116 posts)I prefer to believe the former. Not that she gives a damn.
Irish_Dem
(47,495 posts)Only two options.
ananda
(28,879 posts)She is so fucking smarmy to boot.
Irish_Dem
(47,495 posts)She isn't even clever enough to make her lies convincing.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,434 posts)ashredux
(2,609 posts)Response to groundloop (Original post)
Post removed
shrike3
(3,811 posts)MOMFUDSKI
(5,697 posts)dumbest fuck of the lot of 'em. And that is saying something.
mackdaddy
(1,528 posts)Or maybe refer them to the DOJ for lying under oath?
Some of us are concerned.....
Bo Zarts
(25,405 posts)Fully support .. 100%, not 98% .. any expansion of the Supreme Court, AND any attempt to impeach certain members of the SC who lied under oath at their confirmation hearings.
Midnight Writer
(21,816 posts)groundloop
(11,527 posts)wiggs
(7,819 posts)IronLionZion
(45,550 posts)She was behind in the polls and then had an upset victory. Many of us were sure that seat would flip to blue. Very mysterious.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)wrong side of history..INCONSISTENT you say..let's try this "THEY LIED TO YOU and the American People.. MISS SO SMART..KNOW NOTHING ..concern ain't cuttin' it anymore..
Hey hey, Ho ho, Collins got to go!!!! She has absolutely NO integrity..
Evolve Dammit
(16,781 posts)a "deeply concerned" imbecile. Perhaps a sternly worded letter? Nah, she's good with it.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)Fuck you Susan. You knew they would do this.
infullview
(982 posts)Ya, right.
justhanginon
(3,290 posts)the words; "they f'ing lied to congress and should be impeached".
bucolic_frolic
(43,350 posts)Liberty Belle
(9,537 posts)GB_RN
(2,391 posts)Saying they believe its settled precedent or they believe in stare decisis isnt the same thing as explicitly stating under oath, I wont vote to overturn Roe. The two former statements let you THINK thats what they said, when they said no such thing.
Ursus Rex
(149 posts)"I never said I wouldn't CHANGE it."
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)lark
(23,163 posts)She damn well fucking knew this would happen and she was ok with voting for them because she herself is a liar and cares not one whit that working class/poor women now have no bodily integrity. We are mere chatel for the white man's seed and have no other worth - just ask the 6 SCOTUS's. I specially hate the liars Comey Barrett & Kavanaugh, they both lied to Congress and should be immediately impeached - except for the DINOS Mancin and Sienema who don't care about anything except their money from the rw donors
I hate them all, they are destroying the lives of so many women and this is just the start. Next they will come for contraception and marriage rights and turn us in fact into a Christofascist country. That is their true goal - ruling by the rich white males and no rights for poor/working class/minorities or women.
LudwigPastorius
(9,190 posts)maybe you're just a gullible dumbass who has no business being a Senator.
Warpy
(111,367 posts)Religious nutball priests and preachers have given Republicans carte blanche to lie, cheat, steal, and do whatever else they can do to seize power so they can put women back into slavery.
Fuck you, Collins, for being totally ignorant and unqualified for any and all paid work and fuck the people who put you into office,
To hell with the lot of you, the hell your ignorance and stupidity and lack of interest in the world around you have put women into.
NewHendoLib
(60,024 posts)NNadir
(33,564 posts)Thanks Maine!
rurallib
(62,460 posts)Response to groundloop (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
cloudythescribbler
(2,586 posts)Clearly, in both cases, they were voting for what the reactionary Republicans did, and their belief is about as reasonable as Charlie Brown & the football
Paladin
(28,276 posts)BarbaRosa
(2,685 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(5,789 posts)WinstonSmith4740
(3,059 posts)She was VERY concerned. I think she even furrowed her brow.
UT_democrat
(143 posts)thats the post
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Susan got played again
Marcuse
(7,522 posts)hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)Its better to remain silent and THOUGHT a fool, than to speak up and remove all doubt.
Shes not naive. Shes just hoping everybody likes her.
This is on her!
elias7
(4,029 posts)turbinetree
(24,720 posts)you have no concern you are and always will be someone that puts party of country .......your votes prove that .....go away you already have caused so much damage........
33taw
(2,448 posts)ruet
(10,039 posts)In their Senate confirmation hearings, John Roberts and Samuel Alito cast themselves as first-rate lawyers, as masters of legal craftsmanship who are committed to the principle of stare decisis -- the principle that justices must follow precedent in an honest and forthright manner.
John Roberts assured the Senate Judiciary Committee that judges must "be bound down by rules and precedents." Invoking Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, he affirmed that "the founders appreciated the role of precedent in promoting evenhandedness, predictability, stability," and "integrity in the judicial process." Although acknowledging that it is sometimes necessary for judges to reconsider precedents, he stressed that this should be reserved for exceptional circumstances, where a decision has proved clearly "unworkable" over time. But in general, "a sound judicial philosophy should reflect recognition of the fact that the judge operates within a system of rules developed over the years by other judges equally striving to live up to the judicial oath."
Similarly, Samuel Alito testified to the Senate that the doctrine of stare decisis is "a fundamental part of our legal system." This principle, he explained, "limits the power of the judiciary" and "reflects the view that courts should respect the judgments and the wisdom that are embodied in prior judicial decisions." Stare decisis, he added, is "not an inexorable command," but there must be a strong "resumption that courts are going to follow prior precedents."
It is hardly surprising that Roberts and Alito would pay such obeisance to the doctrine of stare decisis in order to get themselves confirmed. Stare decisis is, after all, the bedrock principle of the rule of law. Not only does it promote stability and encourage judges to decide cases based on principle rather than on a preference for one or another of the parties before them, but it also serves importantly to reduce the politicization of the court. It moderates ideological swings and preserves both the appearance and the reality that the Supreme Court is truly a legal rather than a political institution.
lees1975
(3,888 posts)You were certainly not naive enough to believe that their assurances to you, in order to get your confirmation vote, were truthful, were you?
Glad to see that there's still enough integrity there for you not to fold up, but to call them on it. At least the media has the means to hold their feet to the fire.
58Sunliner
(4,414 posts)hamsterjill
(15,224 posts)Under his eye.
Alien Life Form
(370 posts)Just like what you said about Trump the lesson being that lying carries no consequences,
minstrel76
(83 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,812 posts)2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)Susan Collins. Or so she says.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,635 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,477 posts)0rganism
(23,974 posts)Perhaps even perturbed
Wicked Blue
(5,857 posts)Time to frown slightly with chagrin and then go back to voting with her fellow slimebags
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Retire, you dumb fucking.....
rpannier
(24,341 posts)We both think she knew
She's now trying to save face
But, let's give her the benefit of that doubt
That means she got played by Trump, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh
Doesn't say much for her now, does it?
lees1975
(3,888 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)I thought it might be satire when I read that word.
She should know about the memes and jokes about her and concern.