Defense Department to keep access to "reproductive health care" after Roe v. Wade's end
Source: Axios
Why it matters: The Defense Department currently does not have a policy to accommodate service members or employees who are seeking an abortion but are stationed in a state that has outlawed abortion, Politico reports.
Federal law currently allows military medical facilities to provide abortions only in cases of rape, incest or if a womans life is in danger, while the military's health program is allowed to cover abortions at private facilities for those same reasons only.
What they're saying: "Nothing is more important to me or to this Department than the health and well-being of our Service members, the civilian workforce and DOD families," Austin said in a statement on Friday.
Read more: https://www.axios.com/2022/06/25/defense-department-abortion-access-roe-v-wade
emulatorloo
(44,131 posts)tirebiter
(2,537 posts)If the Republicans get the Preidency in 2024 or anytime thereafter without a change in the SCOTUS or the law, then its over. This does only pertain to active duty personnel or their dependents, regardless. I dont think USAA would cover this. ACA would be covered by state rules as would universal Medicare.
kelly1mm
(4,733 posts)"Federal law currently allows military medical facilities to provide abortions only in cases of rape, incest or if a womans life is in danger, while the military's health program is allowed to cover abortions at private facilities for those same reasons only."
Good luck getting the votes in congress (particularly the Senate) to overrule that.
tirebiter
(2,537 posts)Which was not passed into law this year. Biden thought ahead on that one. Im finding it hard to find anything substantive on this.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Biden "thought ahead of time" in his proposal for the 2023 budget, but there is no sign that he can get a budget passed without it.
It was dropped from the 2022 budget when proposed as well... but we weren't able to get that passed.
It was a "red line" for Manchin. There aren't 51 votes to drop it, let alone the 60 needed to bypass a filibuster.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Perhaps they're saying that they'll allow for travel to another state?
I suppose it could be saying that if you're in a state that bans abortion including in cases of rape/incest that the military medical services will still provide one... but I'm not sure that they have that option. Have to look at how Hyde rubs up against federal enclave doctrine
LeftInTX
(25,364 posts)Military bases within a state are generally exempt from state laws. They would not need to travel to another state.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)As you say - it's a pretty strict set of standards currently and they aren't changing.
The only thing I could think of was that (previously), someone in the military who needed an abortion (outside these narrow constraints) would have to leave the base and go out into town to see a civilian doctor. But now it's a much bigger deal if they have to travel hundreds of miles for a few days. Servicemembers can't always do get enough leave within a desired timeline.
I guessed that what they were saying was that the services were prepared to accommodate such needs.
I've seen much wilder speculation that the president should set up clinics in the ban states on federal property to overcome state laws, but I don't consider that credible (and certainly don't see it implied here).
IronLionZion
(45,450 posts)and many of them don't want to be pregnant.
The OP doesn't say abortion specifically so there are probably focused on options for contraception and birth control.
LeftInTX
(25,364 posts)However, in Texas abortion is now illegal for rape and incest, unless they are performed at DOD facility. The state does not have jurisdiction on military bases. However, there is fine tuning that needs to be done to keep these services available, such as educating staff etc etc etc
machoneman
(4,007 posts)...tell me why not? And btw, if he orders same, who will stop the C.I.C.? Clarence? Mitch, Boebert?
No effin' way. Oh, and please don't quote Hyde or any other law the SC claims is in effect. They are a rogue passel of black robed R's (well, too many that is) that we can ignore as an illegitimate branch of government. If we ignore them, we win.
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)You've confused which candidate won in 2020. That sounds far too much like the former guy.
Biden is sworn to uphold and execute the laws, not ignore them.