NASA once again calls off Artemis I moon mission due to technical issues
Last edited Sat Sep 3, 2022, 11:37 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: CNN
Kennedy Space Center, Florida (CNN)NASA has once again waved off an attempt to launch its massive new moon rocket on an uncrewed test mission because of technical issues. The scrub was called at 11:17 a.m. ET, three hours before the beginning of the launch window. NASA administrator Bill Nelson said that the mission managers will hold a meeting to discuss the next steps and determine if a launch is possible on Monday or Tuesday, or if the rocket stack needs to be rolled back into the Vehicle Assembly Building.
The agency will hold a press conference at 4 p.m. ET to share an update. Artemis I had been slated to take off Saturday afternoon, but those plans were scrubbed after team members discovered a liquid hydrogen leak that they spent the better part of the morning trying to resolve. Liquid hydrogen is one of the propellants used in the rocket's large core stage. The leak prevented the launch team from being able to fill the liquid hydrogen tank despite trying various troubleshooting procedures.
It's the second time in a week that the space agency has been forced to halt the launch countdown in the face of technical issues. The first launch attempt, on Monday, was called off after several issues arose, including with a system meant to cool the rocket's engines ahead of liftoff and various leaks that sprung up as the rocket was being fueled. The liquid hydrogen leak was detected Saturday at 7:15 a.m. ET in the quick disconnect cavity that feeds the rocket with hydrogen in the engine section of the core stage. It was a different leak than one that occurred ahead of the scrubbed launch on Monday.
The launch controllers warmed up the line in an attempt to get a tight seal and the flow of liquid hydrogen resumed before a leak reoccurred. They stopped the flow of liquid hydrogen and proceeded to "close the valve used to fill and drain it, then increase pressure on a ground transfer line using helium to try to reseal it," according to NASA. That troubleshooting plan was not successful. The team attempted the first plan again to warm up the line, but the leak reoccurred after they manually restarted the flow of liquid hydrogen. There was a 60% chance of favorable weather conditions for the launch, according to weather officer Melody Lovin.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/03/world/nasa-artemis-1-saturday-launch-scn/index.html
Story being updated. Original article -
The leak prevented the launch team from being able to fill the liquid hydrogen tank despite trying various troubleshooting procedures. It's the second time in a week that the space agency has been forced to halt the launch countdown in the face of technical issues. The first launch attempt, on Monday, was called off after several issues arose, including with a system meant to cool the rocket's engines ahead of liftoff and various leaks that sprung up as the rocket was being fueled.
The liquid hydrogen leak was detected at 7:15 a.m. ET in the quick disconnect cavity that feeds the rocket with hydrogen in the engine section of the core stage. It was a different leak than one that occurred ahead of the scrubbed launch on Monday. The launch controllers warmed up the line in an attempt to get a tight seal and the flow of liquid hydrogen resumed before a leak reoccurred. They stopped the flow of liquid hydrogen and proceeded to "close the valve used to fill and drain it, then increase pressure on a ground transfer line using helium to try to reseal it," according to NASA.
That troubleshooting plan was not successful. The team attempted the first plan again to warm up the line, but the leak reoccurred after they manually restarted the flow of liquid hydrogen. The launch window opens at 2:17 p.m. ET and closes at 4:17 p.m. ET on Saturday. NASA's live coverage began at 5:45 a.m. ET on its website and TV channel. This process has put the team behind schedule, but it's unclear how much of a delay it will cause in the countdown because they may be able to make up some time later.
Bayard
(28,590 posts)But, damn!
JohnSJ
(98,883 posts)onecaliberal
(36,594 posts)Waiting is the right course.
Shermann
(9,008 posts)speak easy
(12,595 posts)"Obviously a major malfunction"
Ray Bruns
(5,985 posts)llashram
(6,269 posts)putty and crazy glue will do it... Just kidding. Better safe than sorry. While no living creature on this flight, these memories do enter my mind sometimes. The Challenger and Columbia taught many lessons I hope.
https://earthnworld.com/space-shuttle-disasters/
Ray Bruns
(5,985 posts)Kali
(56,636 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(105,574 posts)https://www.foxweather.com/weather-news/artemis-1-launch-forecast-nasa-historic-moon-rocket-launch
and then:
https://spaceflightnow.com/2022/06/24/nasa-targeting-late-summer-launch-for-first-artemis-moon-rocket/
electric_blue68
(25,939 posts)I feel bad for everyone who went down there.
A lot of non locals won't have another chance.
I feel less bad for the professionals, they're getting paid.
LudwigPastorius
(14,181 posts)Please tell me this isn't the fault of an o-ring that isn't sealing.
Mysterian
(6,177 posts)Everybody will forget the delays once this thing is flying around the moon.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,574 posts)While the VAB would provide shelter from the weather and would not require assembly of an environment enclosure to protect sensitive components during the repair work, engineers would not be able to test the fitting with cryogenic hydrogen. And that's when leaks are most likely to show up.
Either option means a multi-week launch delay. The next lunar launch period starts Sept. 19 and runs through Oct. 4. But NASA is scheduled to launch a fresh crew to the International Space Station aboard a SpaceX capsule on Oct. 3 and the agency wants to avoid a conflict.
That means the SLS launch likely will slip into the next launch period, which opens Oct. 17 and runs through Halloween, unless a solution can be found to speed up the repair work.
...
The current launch window closes Tuesday, the same day certification of batteries in the rocket's self-destruct system expires. That alone would have required roll back to the Vehicle Assembly Building for already-planned servicing because the batteries cannot be accessed at the launch pad.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/artemis-1-moon-rocket-launch-scrubbed-hydrogen-leak-nasa/