Exodus continues at Twitter as Elon Musk hints at possible bankruptcy
Source: The Guardian
As Elon Musks ownership of Twitter entered its third week, and following mass layoffs, the billionaire laid bare a delicate financial future for the social media platform, amid an exodus of top privacy and security executives.
Yoel Roth, the head of safety and integrity who had been deputized to publicly address concerns advertisers and users had about the platform, is reportedly the latest to leave the company.
The departures began on the same day Elon Musk addressed employees for the first time, saying that bankruptcy isnt out of the question, according to multiple reports.
The day began with the resignation of three top security officials chief information security officer Lea Kissner, chief privacy officer Damien Kieran and chief compliance officer Marianne Fogarty prompting warnings from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). (Twitter reached a settlement over privacy issues with the FTC in May.) Following those departures, Roth and Twitters head of client solutions, Robin Wheeler, also left the company.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/nov/10/exodus-twitter-elon-musk-possible-bankruptcy?amp;amp;amp
C_U_L8R
(48,854 posts)rpannier
(24,848 posts)Drum
(10,569 posts)PortTack
(35,811 posts)PatSeg
(52,130 posts)for who can be the biggest loser. Musk after all has far more money to lose! Trump can only dream about losing that kind of money.
The_Casual_Observer
(27,742 posts)Paying 3X what it was worth and then trying to make that up on the backs of fired employees doesn't ever work tho it's been tried many times in other industries.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)...worldwide.
*and that of his funding partners
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,853 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)Kennah
(14,537 posts)RainCaster
(13,385 posts)AZLD4Candidate
(6,730 posts)Kennah
(14,537 posts)Wicked Blue
(8,439 posts)Kennah
(14,537 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)keithbvadu2
(40,915 posts)Just think of all the happy stockholders who got out at the right time.
(They didn't have much choice on getting out.)
I hope they already got paid.
Plectranthus
(69 posts)that man is NOT aging gracefully
edit: spelling
Demovictory9
(37,113 posts)TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)not fooled
(6,603 posts)Too popular a platform for getting political information (some of it of high quality but not favorable to oligarchs) out to the masses? Difficult to understand what else they were after.
TheBlackAdder
(29,981 posts)EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)He did this on behalf of Trump? GOP? Against free speech? It sure seems like he intended to dismantle Twitter. And, now Zuckerberg thinks he knows something and is following in his footsteps. What's going on?
44 billion bucks. Can you imagine what you could do with that amount of money? All the public good you could do? Or even, all the pleasure you could have? Why, you could start your own political party...
Crowman2009
(3,406 posts)Yeah, I feel so defeated right now!
Ahpook
(2,777 posts)A company head treats his/her employees like an enemy and expect anything positive in return? Treat people well and you get good returns. Simple concept?
I worked for a company that I cried to leave but had to because of life things. He treated ALL 300+ employees like we were gold. And we in turn loved the job and put in 110% daily.
electric_blue68
(25,887 posts)the good feelings go both ways, and probably make synergistic progress as a company because of it.
Unfortunately, overly egotistical, sociopathic, or psychopathic bosses make life miserable or worse for employees.
LT Barclay
(3,171 posts)like a fast food worker.
I was getting a hair cut and the stylist told me that all her customers say they are treated the same way on the job.
Ford_Prefect
(8,506 posts)this time next week. It will certainly be defunct by Thanksgiving. Furnishings and properties auction held before Christmas. It's gonna be a cold, hungry December on Market Street.
Where, oh where will all the lonely twits go?
Who has the capacity and the apps in place to carry on the great work?
jmowreader
(52,897 posts)Well, not the part about that idiot bankrupting Twitter in only two weeks. That, I can thoroughly believe.
The unbelievable part is there's a human being in the galaxy who's a worse businessman than Donald Trump.
Does anyone know if Musk was stupid enough to pledge his other businesses as part of getting the financing to buy Twitter? Right now I'd be a bit concerned if I worked for a different Musk business.
LudwigPastorius
(14,153 posts)That was loot that could have been invested in Space X.
...cause the sooner he fucks off to Mars, the better.
ZonkerHarris
(25,577 posts)Martin68
(27,033 posts)But he's a fuckin' genius, isn't he?
Martin68
(27,033 posts)proposition for a huge profit. He tried to back out when he realized what was going on, but it was too late because they would sue him for every penny. He signed the contract after brushing off offers to audit the books.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)Twitter has lost lots of money over the years, but has had some profitable quarters.
As the leading social platform, more of a town square than Facebook, it had excellent prospects, but also, always, the future is uncertain. Investors who can make good money now, rather than wait out uncertainty, jumped at the offer.
It was not a "losing proposition", just an uncertain proposition. tRump is a losing proposition. (un)TruthSocial is a losing proposition, tanking.
However, Egoloon Muskrat is turning Twitter into a losing proposition, now that the unstable genius owns it. The genius part is he is destroying it faster than anyone could have imagined.
Grins
(9,245 posts)so soon after BUYING the company, the SEC and the DoJ should jump down his throat with flaming subpoenas and Lock him up!
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)... into bankruptcy to escape paying his creditors. (probably more precise statement of what you meant)
However, investors take notice of such things. They notice when large investments go sour, even if they are not invested. They will draw conclusions and lower their estimation of the prospects of other Muskrat companies and lower their eagerness to obtain or hold stock in them.
It's a private investment, so I think the SEC is not involved. The investors in the publicly traded company got paid so the SEC is content.
What is the crime here? I don't see one, other than metaphoricly. The DoJ would only investigate or prosecute crimes but not metaphors. Explain the crime.
However, I think Egoloon's partner investors in Twitter would have some cases for civil lawsuits.
Kennah
(14,537 posts)cstanleytech
(28,210 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)to get the company.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)But he is potentially at risk for civil lawsuits from those other investors.
brush
(61,033 posts)And the other investors sure won't be happy.
Prairie_Seagull
(4,595 posts)Does not mean it will be granted. Isn't that correct? If you or I did file for say I million and it was provable that we were worth over 200 billion, I don't believe it would be granted.
Is the financial system so slanted that large corporations ie (people) can get away with shit like this where flesh and blood people can't. WTF.
Kind of tongue in cheek but only kind of.
JI7
(93,195 posts)Aussie105
(7,637 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 11, 2022, 05:16 AM - Edit history (1)
I'm sure Elon mentioning bankruptcy to the workers will make them work twice as hard - at getting their resumes up to date and looking for different jobs.
Musk can go down with the ship. No need for others to stay, they can rush to the lifeboats.
Joinfortmill
(20,037 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)He is rapidly succeeding at destroying moderation at Twitter, which is why he bought it.
Egoloon is out of his lane. Twitter is SOCIAL MEDIA. The muskrat is a nerd and too young to have developed wisdom about society and the needs of democracy and the populace.
Twitter thrived partly because of moderation.
All of Twitters under-moderated competitors -- Parler, Gab, Telegram, (un)TruthSocial, Rumble, etc. -- were not thriving. People fleeing Twitter are not by and large going to them, but rather to other systems like Mastadon, Blue Sky, Counter.
Kennah
(14,537 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)Last edited Fri Nov 11, 2022, 07:12 AM - Edit history (1)
meaning a corporate raider heaping debt on the company, stripping it of assets, pension money even, then declaring bankruptcy?
It's possibly both. 44B for a financially teetering company not even closely related to Musk's core business was not smart, and raiding it to strip it wasn't either.
I mean why pay 44B to strip a company. How do you come out ahead, even if you change it to a bank or some other financial organization? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
A whole lot of trouble to take on with no guarantee of success.
pwb
(12,456 posts)We need a excess wealth tax to rid of of these entitled freaks fucking everything up.
twodogsbarking
(17,571 posts)honest.abe
(9,238 posts)republianmushroom
(22,122 posts)dembotoz
(16,922 posts)worked for a telecom that went bk years ago.
Instead of raises and cash bonus workers were given stock options.
looked wonderful until it headed south.
i was too new to get options so it did not hit me
I saw employees lose thousands and thousands of dollars with the flick of a pen.
The options were not vested yet or some such so all the employees could do was sit and watch their retirement evaporate.
eloon can defer blame for the bk on previous management. Only the employees get fucked
folks will believe him because he is eloon the financial genius who can do no wrong