George Santos Admits to Lying About College and Work History
Last edited Mon Dec 26, 2022, 09:23 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: New York Times
Representative-elect George Santos admitted on Monday to misrepresenting his professional experience and educational history to voters, but said it would not deter him from taking office in January. Mr. Santos, a New York Republican who was elected in November to represent parts of northern Long Island and northeast Queens, confirmed some of the key findings of a New York Times investigation into his background, but sought to minimize the falsehoods in his first remarks since The Times published its findings last week.
My sins here are embellishing my résumé, Mr. Santos told The New York Post in one of two interviews he granted on Monday to conservative-owned media outlets. I am not a criminal, Mr. Santos said, adding that he would still be an effective legislator. In a separate interview with WABC-AM radio, he said he still intended to be sworn in at the start of the next Congress.
The admissions by Mr. Santos served as a capstone to one of the more astonishing examples of an incoming congressman falsifying key biographical elements of his background with Mr. Santos maintaining the falsehoods through two consecutive bids for Congress. Yet even as Mr. Santos, whose victory helped Republicans secure a narrow majority in the next House of Representatives, admitted to some fabrication, his actions will still not prevent him, in all likelihood, from being seated in Congress.
Democrats including the outgoing House speaker, Nancy Pelosi, and the next House Democratic leader, Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York have accused Mr. Santos of being unfit to serve in Congress. Top House Republican leaders, including Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, have largely remained silent.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/26/nyregion/george-santos-interview.html
No paywall
Article updated.
Original article -
Mr. Santos, a Republican who was elected in November to represent parts of northern Long Island and northeast Queens, ended a week of near silence, giving interviews to two conservative-owned media outlets, The New York Post and WABC-AM radio. Mr. Santos told The Post that even though he now admits to embellishing his résumé, it would not stop him from taking office.
I am not a criminal, Mr. Santos told The Post, adding he would still be an effective legislator. He told WABC radio that he still intended to be sworn in at the start of the next Congress. Mr. Santos, through representatives, has declined multiple requests to speak with The Times or to directly address the questions raised by its reporting.
Over the course of his campaigns, Mr. Santos claimed to have graduated from Baruch College in 2010 before working at Citigroup and, eventually, Goldman Sachs. But representatives from the college and both companies said they could not locate records to confirm his graduation or employment. In Mondays interview, Mr. Santos admitted to The Post that he had not graduated from Baruch, nor had he graduated from any institution of higher learning.
No paywall
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)Damn slip of the tongue has me telling people I'm a Ph.D. from MIT and I invented the toaster.
TheBlackAdder
(28,208 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,542 posts)agingdem
(7,850 posts)was the GOPs wet dream..the ultimate token..gay/Jewish/immigrant/educated/Wall Street/charitable..except the guy is a fraud..and the GOP, anxious to disprove their hate for the other, embraced and promoted this shapeshifter.. a guy who doesnt exist
Permanut
(5,610 posts)COL Mustard
(5,904 posts)Didnt you get one for Economics and three others for Chemistry? Or are I confusing those with the one you got for Medicine? Its so easy to confuse the small details about something like that.
bucolic_frolic
(43,177 posts)and I'm wondering where DOJ and NY AGs will be on this subject.
These are not tidbits. These are Whoppers!
Quakerfriend
(5,450 posts)I will be livid if this man is sworn in!
NJCher
(35,685 posts)He will get sworn in and then the House Ethics Committee investigates him.
However, it is possible Letitia James investigation will determine that there is something to prosecute him with.
DENVERPOPS
(8,835 posts)to a college, and the college admits that student based on his/her application lies. When they find out that student's information is all a total falsehood, does the College allow them to stay enrolled????????? I don't fucking think so..........
Not any different than the rich lying on the kids applications, and in addition, the parents also bribing the college to admit their kids. I don't think the kids were allowed to stay enrolled once the truth was revealed......
dutch777
(3,023 posts)Another one for the list of election reform proposals Dems want to put out there.
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)The party of umm what do they stand for again?
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)Just power, whatever it takes to acquire it. That's it. State's Rights? Nope. Family values? Nope. Personal freedom? Nope. Just phrases to use to acquire votes from the rubes that listen to Fox News.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)agingdem
(7,850 posts)Months before the 2020 election Bill Barr was bad mouthing mail-in ballots one bullshit at a time..DeJoy was crippling the mail, removing ballot drop boxes/mailboxes and trashing sorting machines..Trump was assailing Biden at his nazi rallies..if he lost the election it was because Biden had rigged the election..and early on election night when trump was temporarily in the lead he declared himself the winner and demanded the vote count stop (and why not it worked for Bush II)..Trumps rage?..the election he and his sycophants rigged/fixed did not stay rigged, and to Trump that meant one thing: Biden outrigged Trump..and thats why Trump is so damn pissed..
Walleye
(31,028 posts)It wasnt that they didnt think Biden couldnt win an election, it was that they didnt think Biden could cheat better than them
agingdem
(7,850 posts)Trump is a master at projecting his deceit onto his perceived enemies ..in Trumps malignant mind if he was fixing the electIon then it stands to reason so was Biden..
Genki Hikari
(1,766 posts)The USPS has MAIL drop boxes (what the USPS calls collection boxes), but no such thing as ballot drop boxes. One's federal and used for general mail of all kinds--not just dropping off mail-in ballots. The other is local and has only one use--collecting ballots.
It's a difference, and one that matters far beyond elections in the case of USPS.
So bash deJoy all you want for removing collection boxes--he deserves that. But ballot drop boxes were never under his control.
agingdem
(7,850 posts)And in 2020 they had a ballot drop boxes near her neighborhood post office ..they were removed a month before the election..and two mailboxes disappeared as well...I assumed DeJoy removed the ballot drop boxes ..my mistake.. the mailboxes ..definitely DeJoy
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)Warpy
(111,270 posts)i have had the displeasure of meeting a few pathological liars just like him and they are deadly to anyone who sees through them or anyone who gets too close to them. They are utterly without conscience and empathy.
Best thing this country can do is send him back to Brazil. While kiting checks isn't the worst crime out there, quite likely there are others. I'll bet his ex wife has a lot of tales to tell.
OAITW r.2.0
(24,504 posts)would use the same tactics to get elected? Says a lot about the state of journalism in this country that Santos somehow evaded any hi-profile criticism about his fake resume.
Luciferous
(6,081 posts)the election?
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)But it's not illegal (nor disqualifying) for candidates/politicians to lie about their personal history, and the media didn't care to make a big deal about the story.
So ... this full-on fucking liar is about to take office. He'll likely immediately get an 'ethics referral' but that's about it, unless he broke some other law around campaign finance.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)Genki Hikari
(1,766 posts)The Democratic opponent found some of it and tried to address it.
The typically useless NY traitor media ignored it. The same media that spent decades overlooking the known criminal behavior of IQ4.5, and instead bashed Hillary for lies about Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, Troopergate, Benghazi, her emails, and more.
We need to face it: Almost all of the media have been the enemy for over 40 years now, and need to be treated as such.
ampm
(301 posts)But the big question is he a citizen of the US, and how did he win if he is registered, in Florida? How can that be?
dembotoz
(16,808 posts)I live in a very red area.
I have worked with and supported very qualified dem candidates.
To see something like this just makes me ill.
cbabe
(3,548 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 26, 2022, 10:08 PM - Edit history (1)
For example:
https://www.cnn.com 2022 03 30 politics clinton-dnc-steele-dossier-fusion-gps index.html
FEC fines Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC over Trump-Russia ... - CNN
Mar 30, 2022Washington CNN Federal election regulators fined Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee earlier this month for not properly disclosing the money they...
(Not meant to criticize Clinton but to point out there are possible consequences.)
ancianita
(36,067 posts)for election fraud? I really don't get how being elected under false representation and then spending election money under same aren't indictable offenses.
Baitball Blogger
(46,733 posts)Republican.
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)Torchlight
(3,341 posts)Rule 1. It's easier to say 'I'm sorry' afterwards than it is to ask for permission beforehand.
Rebl2
(13,523 posts)even a US citizen? I am beginning to think he has lied about that as well.
angrychair
(8,700 posts)That it doesn't matter. Say what you want and do you you want, once you're elected it doesn't matter. We've made getting elected a virtual get out of jail free card.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)angrychair
(8,700 posts)It's just absurd that things like this aren't automatically disqualifying
James48
(4,436 posts)Of course, Nixon started out that way too. I am not a crook!
Rocknation
(44,576 posts)but a politician would lie about that would lie about ANYTHING. He's got to go.
Rocknation
Stuart G
(38,434 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,248 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)XorXor
(621 posts)I'm not kidding. That's what is being pushed on the republican discussion boards.
onetexan
(13,042 posts)Crook, criminal - is there a difference? Sounds like a job qualifier for repugs.
IronLionZion
(45,450 posts)Someone paid for his campaign and put him up to it.
Ray Bruns
(4,098 posts)to say I built an F-15 model when I was 10,
Is this how this works?
XorXor
(621 posts)Doesn't seem to be very good at lying either based on how easily his claims were proven false. Despite this the republicans still elected him. That is amazing.
His wikipedia page is interesting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Santos
aggiesal
(8,916 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)
my sins are embellishing my résumé
I am not a criminal
Read, I committed an offense (only) against God. I did not break a law of the U.S.
The GOP is happy to throw their God under the bus as long as they find a legal loophole. How pious.
Stuart G
(38,434 posts)Last edited Tue Dec 27, 2022, 08:23 AM - Edit history (1)
if you believe that one...I can sell you a bridge over Lake Michigan for very cheap. (four lane divided highway bridge that was built from Milwaukee to Detroit) Repeat: Very cheap
twodogsbarking
(9,758 posts)E. Normus
(79 posts)attesting to his authenticity. That is lying under oath, so to speak. Once sworn in that can be legally pursued. McCarthy wants his vote for speakership. After that they may compel him in some way to resign. Dems should protest and demand he not be seated!
onetexan
(13,042 posts)Candidates going fwd. Vilify him and mccarthy to the point there's no denying he's a sham and fooled voters into voting for him. I hope Tish James can somehow charging him w making false statements for office. Surely there's got to be some law that criminalizes these types of cqndidates.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)"He (or she) pulled a Santos."
onetexan
(13,042 posts)I'd say he pulled a cawthorn and a slew of others who've beefed up theor resumes but this is the most eggregious, aside from the Con of course. They got the playbook from him.
onenote
(42,714 posts)As long as he meets the Constitutional qualifications to be in Congress: at least 25 years old, Us Citizen, resident of New York when elected.
And the House historically doesnt expel members for conduct occurring before they took office.
In short, if digs in and wont resign theres not much that can be done to take away his seat.
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)There was a time when honesty mattered.
Warpy
(111,270 posts)Embellishing is saying your were an officer of some club in college, when you were merely a sporadic attendee. Embellishing is adding half a point to your GPA.
He wrote a work of fiction and that was all voters had to go on, a pretty story that had nothing to do with the punk who hung his name on it. For that reason, he needs to be expelled from Congress and a special election held to fill the seat.
Republicans, of course, think liars and cheats are peachy fine, so the little shit will stay.
Well, unless Brazil wants to prosecute. We have an extradition treaty with them.
jayschool2013
(2,312 posts)Sounds like a great mini-series.
"Hello! Is this Netflix? You won't believe the story I'm about to tell you."
hsjw
(4 posts)No surprise here,he represents exactly what the Republican party is all about now,their voters don't vote for quality,integrity and honor,that would just be too much for them ! The more dishonest you are the more attractive you become to the republican voter.
Just look at Trump ,do people really want a better example ?
Neither have any credibility but the repubs don't care ,in fact , being dishonest and deceptive seem to be essential criteria for their candidates now.