Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,059 posts)
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 06:38 PM Jan 2023

National Archives considering asking past presidents and vice presidents to look again

Source: CNN Politics

CNN — The National Archives is looking into sending letters to all living former presidents and vice presidents, asking them go through their records to ensure there are no classified materials, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Representatives for four former presidents have all so far told CNN they do not have any classified records in their possession after news that former Vice President Mike Pence had classified documents in his Indiana home. The representatives for former Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, Barack Obama and the late George H.W. Bush all told CNN that all classified records had been turned over to the National Archives upon leaving office.

The discovery of classified documents in Pence’s Carmel, Indiana, home was the third such case in recent months. Former President Donald Trump and current President Joe Biden have also been subject to scrutiny after classified material was found in their homes.

None of the former presidents’ representatives said they were conducting additional searches of homes or offices where documents could potentially be stored. Instead, they reiterated the practices those leaders followed when departing the White House in 1993, 2001, 2009 and 2017.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/24/politics/bill-clinton-george-bush-barack-obama-classified-records



Full headlines: National Archives considering asking past presidents and vice presidents to look again for classified materials
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Archives considering asking past presidents and vice presidents to look again (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 OP
National Archives need to step up their game. They are the direct cause of this mess. They don't do Srkdqltr Jan 2023 #1
Actually the problem is not NARA but the agencies that "own" and maintain the documents BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #2
Obviously the system needs upgrading. It obviously isn't working or the classified material Srkdqltr Jan 2023 #4
Having worked for the federal government for 30+ years before retiring BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #11
If you or I had handled classified as poorly as T, P and B apparently did COL Mustard Jan 2023 #17
Those "GS-1000s" enjoy the "benefits of the office" BumRushDaShow Jan 2023 #21
There needs to be SOME way to know who has what if its classified. oldsoftie Jan 2023 #3
The Archives do not know what classified documents there are until they receive them. friend of a friend Jan 2023 #13
Well then THAT needs to change. oldsoftie Jan 2023 #16
My documents were coded and then sent to NSA headquarters. friend of a friend Jan 2023 #22
Each area that originates a classified document is supposed Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #23
In 1962-1963, once I had the Lt sign off on my coded document and gave it to communications, friend of a friend Jan 2023 #27
That makes total sense! Wonder if still true. If anyone Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #28
When I was in the Army we had TS Control Officers and still had to account for Secret documents. COL Mustard Jan 2023 #18
There is a very easy way. former9thward Jan 2023 #20
Sounds like a good idea to me; of maybe an RFID oldsoftie Jan 2023 #26
+1 Laura PourMeADrink Jan 2023 #29
They should probably also include members of Congressional Committees... TygrBright Jan 2023 #5
Realistically, they are probably holding far more than the 10 or so living presidents and VP's Renew Deal Jan 2023 #6
Is it possible Rebl2 Jan 2023 #7
United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, every member irisblue Jan 2023 #8
Don't see the relevance. Igel Jan 2023 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author COL Mustard Jan 2023 #19
I just gotta say here. WTF? bluestarone Jan 2023 #9
Mondale reportedly stonewalling. Sneederbunk Jan 2023 #10
Start with Dick Cheney n/t kewhawaii Jan 2023 #12
It's probably a very good idea, wonder what Cheney's files would turn up Warpy Jan 2023 #15
Including George Washington? Oneironaut Jan 2023 #24
Cheney be like... Polybius Jan 2023 #25

Srkdqltr

(6,291 posts)
1. National Archives need to step up their game. They are the direct cause of this mess. They don't do
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 06:41 PM
Jan 2023

What they say they do.

BumRushDaShow

(129,059 posts)
2. Actually the problem is not NARA but the agencies that "own" and maintain the documents
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 06:55 PM
Jan 2023

A transcribed "Top Secret" communique between the President and some other head of state may have the State Department, DOD, or even the Office of the White House as an "owner".

Each agency then handles, preserves, and stores (eventually SENDING to NARA) those documents that their schedules deem need preservation and storing for some "x" amount of time.

NARA is nothing more than the "end point" for documents that are not designated for destruction right away, but need to be maintained somewhere.

Srkdqltr

(6,291 posts)
4. Obviously the system needs upgrading. It obviously isn't working or the classified material
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:01 PM
Jan 2023

Isn't as important as they say and Biden, Trump and Pence are not guilty of any wrongdoing. Actually this isn't their mess it's the agency/ department.

BumRushDaShow

(129,059 posts)
11. Having worked for the federal government for 30+ years before retiring
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:35 PM
Jan 2023

the "system" works for the most part - i.e., with the average civil service employees. WE had the annual training on documents handling and were read the riot act complete with 5 CFR statute citations and whatnot.

The "issue" are your top-most people, elected or appointed, IOW the "GS-1000s" that I call them, and that is strictly "political deference".

What has happened here is that you had one individual who massively abused "the system", a "system" that when it comes to your highest officials, was based on "honor". When you have someone in there that has none, then you see the result.

COL Mustard

(5,897 posts)
17. If you or I had handled classified as poorly as T, P and B apparently did
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:09 PM
Jan 2023

(And yes, I know for the most part it was their staffs who did it)...do you think we'd get a Special Counsel? I don't think so, from my cubicle in an unusually shaped building on the banks of the Potomac. These cases make it much harder for rank and filers to be held accountable....Hey, if the big bosses don't get punished, why am I losing my clearance? I didn't do anything they didn't do....

That reminds me, I need to send a reminder about just that to my workforce.

BumRushDaShow

(129,059 posts)
21. Those "GS-1000s" enjoy the "benefits of the office"
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:21 PM
Jan 2023

But we both know it's a revolving door and they come and go. But they have "privileges" that you or I would never have so best not question it (unless you want to go the Whistleblower route). I know I had worked under 6 Presidents and just tried to keep my head down and do my job.

oldsoftie

(12,548 posts)
3. There needs to be SOME way to know who has what if its classified.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:00 PM
Jan 2023

Bob took these documents on feb 15th. Its now Aug 1st. Why hasn't Bob returned them? Just like checking out a library book. Each group that has control over secure docs needs to have a better way to keep up with them
This has gotten ridiculous. And now it gives the Trumpers the ability to say "see, they ALL do it"

 

friend of a friend

(367 posts)
13. The Archives do not know what classified documents there are until they receive them.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:36 PM
Jan 2023

Very few classified documents are actually sent to The National Archives. Many are written and then sent to someone who reads them and then puts them in a burn bag. In 9 months I wrote about 270 TOP SECRET NSA CODEWORD documents I doubt any of them went to the archive.

oldsoftie

(12,548 posts)
16. Well then THAT needs to change.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:50 PM
Jan 2023

As the originator of the document YOU should know that it WAS destroyed and if not where it is. Otherwise what's the point? Anyone could keep docs and nobody knows?
If thats the case the only thing we can get trump on is ignoring the subpoena

 

friend of a friend

(367 posts)
22. My documents were coded and then sent to NSA headquarters.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:22 PM
Jan 2023

NSA then decided whether or not the new equipment should be installed on other bases around the world. I don't know how many bases received the new equipment for testing. At the end of the experiment, I was ordered to put all documents in burn bags since it was no longer needed.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
23. Each area that originates a classified document is supposed
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 11:03 PM
Jan 2023

To follow a procedure and track aand secure. Separate and aside from Archiver

 

friend of a friend

(367 posts)
27. In 1962-1963, once I had the Lt sign off on my coded document and gave it to communications,
Thu Jan 26, 2023, 09:02 AM
Jan 2023

I locked up the original.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
28. That makes total sense! Wonder if still true. If anyone
Thu Jan 26, 2023, 10:23 AM
Jan 2023

Still cares if original or not. Wonder if trump had originals.

COL Mustard

(5,897 posts)
18. When I was in the Army we had TS Control Officers and still had to account for Secret documents.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:11 PM
Jan 2023

That all started getting loosened in the 1980s and I think the horse has left the barn with the classified computers and printers that are now everywhere in DOD.

former9thward

(32,016 posts)
20. There is a very easy way.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 09:20 PM
Jan 2023

Its called a bar code. Its how Walmart or any store like it can tell you exactly where any one of its tens of millions of items are at anywhere in the country. No one needs to reinvent the wheel here.

TygrBright

(20,760 posts)
5. They should probably also include members of Congressional Committees...
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:04 PM
Jan 2023

...that potentially have access to classified materials/briefings.

Not a bad idea to do a clean sweep at this point.

Also, it will keep the stickybeaks busy.

And it might make a few Russian agents nervous.

Can't really see a downside beyond cost, and we could always recoup that by repealing [Redacted]'s tax cuts for the obscenely wealthy. Which, incidentally, should also remove any pressure on the repayments to citizen-contributed funds such as Social Security and Medicare. A two-fer!

thoughtfully,
Bright

irisblue

(32,980 posts)
8. United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, every member
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:19 PM
Jan 2023

From the wiki page
"As part of its oversight responsibilities, the Committee performs an annual review of the intelligence budget submitted by the president and prepares legislation authorizing appropriations for the various civilian and military agencies and departments comprising the intelligence community. These entities include the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, as well as the intelligence-related components of Department of State, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Department of the Treasury, and Department of Energy.

The Committee makes recommendations to the Senate Armed Services Committee on authorizations for the intelligence-related components of the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force, and U.S. Marine Corps. The Committee also conducts periodic investigations, audits, and inspections of intelligence activities and programs."

Follow the money trails

more there

Igel

(35,317 posts)
14. Don't see the relevance.
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:15 PM
Jan 2023

They review the budget.

Looking at budget numbers doesn't mean reviewing the documents in each division.

I was on a Board of Directors. Similar budget-related charge. Never considered asking for employee contracts, sale figures for a given day in the student store, lists of applications for food service employment, or a list of vendors for BearWare.

Never had access to those dox. Budget, yes; in-house details ... not really.

Response to Igel (Reply #14)

bluestarone

(16,959 posts)
9. I just gotta say here. WTF?
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 07:23 PM
Jan 2023

This is so fucked up, what's happening to our fucking classified material. Holy shit. NOBODY is watching our secrets!!

Warpy

(111,267 posts)
15. It's probably a very good idea, wonder what Cheney's files would turn up
Wed Jan 25, 2023, 08:43 PM
Jan 2023

since "I barely know him" Mike Pence had a few oopsies in his papers.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»National Archives conside...