Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jgo

(921 posts)
Mon Mar 20, 2023, 06:03 PM Mar 2023

Jeffrey Epstein banks to face sex trafficking case

Source: BBC News

Two banks connected with the late Jeffrey Epstein will face lawsuits over claims they enabled his sex trafficking, a US court has ruled.

Two women who say the financier sexually abused them brought the case against JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank.

In a four-page order Judge Rakoff wrote that the women and Virgin Islands government could try to make the case the banks had "knowingly benefited from participating in a sex trafficking venture".

He also allowed the women to pursue claims the banks were negligent and obstructed enforcement of a federal anti-trafficking law.


Read more: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-65017982?at_medium=RSS&at_campaign=KARANGA

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeffrey Epstein banks to face sex trafficking case (Original Post) jgo Mar 2023 OP
Will these banks be found suicided? GreenWave Mar 2023 #1
Shorted on rope stock. nt Xipe Totec Mar 2023 #3
Right after the Golden Parachute clauses are effected Kennah Mar 2023 #5
Cool! 2naSalit Mar 2023 #2
Maybe Cherokee100 Mar 2023 #4
Did the banks have any way to know what Epstein was up to? Do the banks have more responsibility Martin68 Mar 2023 #6
Why to this day robbob Mar 2023 #7
I fail to see how the banks are to blame for that. Martin68 Mar 2023 #8
I wasn't commenting on the banks responsibility... robbob Mar 2023 #9
from another article jgo Mar 2023 #10

Martin68

(22,877 posts)
6. Did the banks have any way to know what Epstein was up to? Do the banks have more responsibility
Tue Mar 21, 2023, 11:59 AM
Mar 2023

than prosecutors who let Epstein off easy the first time around?

robbob

(3,538 posts)
7. Why to this day
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 11:33 AM
Mar 2023

Has there been no action against the clients of Epstein? Supposedly all kinds of evidence was seized, client lists, possibly video tapes of powerful men abusing young women, some who may have been minors. It’s all been locked away in a secret vault, warehoused somewhere like the Arc at the end of Indiana Jones. I guess some people are “too big to prosecute”?

Martin68

(22,877 posts)
8. I fail to see how the banks are to blame for that.
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 11:37 PM
Mar 2023

I'd like to see all Epstein's clients suffer the consequences, but the subject at hand was the "responsibility" of his banks. I still don't understand how they can be held responsible.

robbob

(3,538 posts)
9. I wasn't commenting on the banks responsibility...
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 11:41 PM
Mar 2023

You mention prosecutors letting Epstein off easy, that got me thinking about how the whole story has kind of vanished down the memory hole with the death of Epstein. Maybe I should have been replying to the OP?

jgo

(921 posts)
10. from another article
Wed Mar 22, 2023, 11:52 PM
Mar 2023

"The suits allege that JP Morgan Chase and Deutsche Bank knew that Epstein maintained a network of underage girls for sexual abuse, and actively enabled him to continue his crimes. The plaintiffs say that the banks should be held fiscally liable for the damage to victims.

...

which allows the suits to move forward to examine other legal questions, including:

whether the banks knowingly benefited from participating in a sex-trafficking venture
whether the banks obstructed enforcement of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act
whether the banks negligently failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent harm"

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeffrey Epstein banks to ...