Prosecutors accept deal with George Santos in Brazilian fraud case
Source: cnn
By Julia Vargas Jones, CNN Updated 7:38 PM EDT, Fri March 24, 2023
Prosecutors in Brazil have agreed to a deal with Rep. George Santos in a case in which he is accused of defrauding a Rio de Janeiro area clerk of $1,300 over clothes and shoes in 2008, documents obtained by CNN show.
A petition from Santos attorney requesting a deal says Santos would agree to formally confess to the crime and pay damages to the victim, a Rio de Janeiro area clerk, as is required under Brazilian law.
A memo from prosecutors agreeing to the deal last week asked the defense for assurances they have the ability to contact the victim to repay him before the deal is finalized.
In a statement to CNN, the prosecutors office acknowledged the memo but stressed that the deal is not final until all conditions are met. ......................
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/24/politics/george-santos-prosecutors-brazil-fraud-case
He is a con man in my book.
Link to tweet
?s=20
Bev54
(10,072 posts)RockRaven
(15,006 posts)has a better ring to it?
riversedge
(70,306 posts)BaronChocula
(1,590 posts)That should get Republicans back on track
Martin68
(22,890 posts)NBachers
(17,142 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,330 posts)a leadership position now.
sakabatou
(42,176 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,256 posts)Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)checkbook of one of her clients. Id also like to know why he wasnt charged for the crime of stealing the check he paid the clerk with.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)He used checks from an elderly patient that his mother, a home Healthcare nurse was caring for. My questions are did this elderly person have family who tried to pursue this? It may be that he/she did and that is why the check was rejected by the bank. A worse case would be that his mother's signature would have been accepted, but most his. If so, did the Stantos family defraud the elderly person.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)the fascists candidate a little closer, wouldn't be that hard to shed light on that fraudster. A major f'up imho.
Grins
(7,231 posts)Too many caves; from Santos to the J-6ers. Cant these judges, at least one of them, accept the Prosecutors sentencing recommendation?
Marcuse
(7,508 posts)brush
(53,871 posts)Marcuse
(7,508 posts)cstanleytech
(26,319 posts)SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)Xandric
(60 posts)I would triple check those checks or money orders.
Response to riversedge (Original post)
Writethinker This message was self-deleted by its author.