American Airlines sues a travel site to crack down on consumers who use this trick to save money
Source: AP
By DAVID KOENIG
Updated 4:32 PM CDT, August 18, 2023
DALLAS (AP) American Airlines is suing a travel website that sells tickets that let people save money by exploiting a quirk in airline pricing.
American sued Skiplagged Inc. in federal court in Fort Worth, Texas, this week, accusing the website of deception. It threatened to cancel every ticket that Skiplagged has sold.
In a practice called skiplagging and hidden-city ticketing, travelers book a flight that includes at least one stop, but they leave the plane during a layover. Generally skiplagging is not illegal, but airlines claim that it violates their policies.
Last month, American booted a 17-year-old from a flight and banned him for three years when he tried to use the tactic to fly from Gainesville, Florida, to Charlotte, North Carolina, on a ticket that listed New York City as his destination. For the teen, that was cheaper than booking a flight directly to Charlotte.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/american-airlines-lawsuit-skiplagging-tickets-905acda8ac5fe302238cefd63ac864e3
Alice Kramden
(2,880 posts)and deplaned in Charlotte, I do not see any harm.
sinkingfeeling
(57,226 posts)Alice Kramden
(2,880 posts)So he paid to go to NY and deplaned in Charlotte. I don't see anything wrong with doing that.
sinkingfeeling
(57,226 posts)from Charlotte hunting for the booked passenger. It's against the terms of the ticket (read the fine print) to skip lag.
Alice Kramden
(2,880 posts)Merlot
(9,696 posts)drray23
(8,584 posts)if a passenger is not on the plane they have to remove his/her checked luggage. it's a security measure. In this instance they had to check if thus guy had checked luggage ( he probably did not) before being able to depart.
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)If you intended to bail during the layover?
drray23
(8,584 posts)because of potential security issues
Zeitghost
(4,557 posts)They don't need to do a search.
Farmer-Rick
(12,480 posts)They didn't even wait 10 minutes. So, no the flight is not delayed for only one passenger.
Seems to me if they charge less for a flight to New York which is further away, then it's a very bad pricing scheme.
The airlines take way too much liberty with our money and time.
Marthe48
(22,725 posts)I was booked to pick up an AA flight to Bangor, Maine. AA would not confirm I had a seat until I was at the desk at the gate. Several other passengers had the same problem. As I waited to talk to someone, the lady I was waiting with saw a person in an AA uniform. They turned out to be a flight attendent. They said AA assumed 4 or 5 people would miss connecting flights because they didn't know how big the Charlotte airport is and couldn't make it from the regional gates to the national/international gates. My daughter arranged a wheelchair for me and the attendent maneuvered the chair like they were driving at Indy! So I made it, but if I had had to walk, I would've missed the flight. I think that assuming people will miss their connection is a lousy way to book seats.
I had to wait at Charlotte for 6 hours on my way home, and I heard names announced for flights 2 times. I thought how awful that the person missed their flight. But maybe they didn't plan to go further.
It used to be, I'd see airline ads for $99 round trip flights from Columbus or Cleveland, Ohio. I thought that'd be a way I could go see my daughter in Maryland, or maybe go to a beach. But no, the $99 flights were to NYC or LA, never a shorter hop. I don't even look any more.
wishstar
(5,803 posts)Several year ago before having smartphones with aps for notification, we sat at original gate too late until finding out about gate change and we raced to correct gate arriving before departure time.
We arrived 10 minutes before the plane took off but they still refused to let us board. Our luggage was on the plane. So in our case there was no delay for them to wait for us or to remove our luggage which is two of the excuses given to justify airlines crackdown.
delisen
(7,217 posts)Karma13612
(4,919 posts)Unfair and expensive.
Airlines are bringing this skiplagging practice on themselves because their prices are ridiculous. And I think their policy should be looked at by the FTC. OR commerce or who ever is in charge of defending consumers on unfair pricing.
It reminds me of how illegal music downloading became popular. When prices are way too high for consumers, they find a way to save money. Musicians and airlines need to be paid, but when pricing is outrageous, necessity is the mother of invention.
Martin68
(27,061 posts)off early so, understandably, they leave without saying goodbye. If you buy a ticket you should have the right to use as much or as little of the services you've paid for as you want. If you buy a season pass for baseball games and miss a few, they can't penalize you.
Karma13612
(4,919 posts)Lawsuit on this airline policy.
Once again, the airlines is telling the public to just accept exorbitant pricing, all the add on costs, and they treat us like cattle when we are on board, and they double book and cancel flights.
It needs to be pushed back on.
stopdiggin
(15,034 posts)But is no one else struck by how utterly ludicrous the underlying mechanics are here? The bizarro world of airlines - where of course a series of flights involving more than one plane, and deplaning and a layover in at least one other airport - will be priced at a significant savings to just stepping off the the short flight, in the exact same aircraft, going directly to the desired location. Because 'pricing metrics' (or some such folderol) It's patently absurd, and borderline crazy!
-------
---
---
--------------
-----
ShazzieB
(22,214 posts)It's absolutely insane.
Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)America is so backward when it comes to consumer protections, the corporations have corrupted politicians and this is only one of the many many negative consequences for People.
Solution?
See Canada
always look there first
consumers are actually considered humans.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Arent ALL the airlines this way?
PortTack
(35,815 posts)Tickets are really expensive regardless of lay overs or direct flights. I cant blame anyone for trying to make it more affordable
quakerboy
(14,714 posts)But my experiences lead me to think it seems quite likely to me that the airlines put together a "low" price for a flight with more stops and then raise the price on more direct options, assuming that many will pay the higher price to avoid the hassle.
Id also expect that sometimes its cheaper for them to fill up several low occupancy flights than to add more direct flights.
Probably a few calculations going into these things, Some sensible and others unkind at best.
mitch96
(15,655 posts)A creative result to finding a cost based solution to a travel situation... Uff, new speak..
I don't see a problem with it.
m
DJ Porkchop
(635 posts)orleans
(36,672 posts)would be more expensive than a direct flight.
seems like a lot of fucking around and a bit of a racket.
but i read the article; talking about being competitive for pricing when all the other airlines are doing the long flights but they can make money on the shorter destinations if only a couple airlines fly there.
whatever!
i think it's weird the 17 yr old was questioned before boarding -- b/c the ticket agent looked at his license and figured he'd just get off the plane in north carolina and stay off once he got home. so they didn't let him fly at all. kid admitted what he was going to do. should have insisted he was going to stay with sick grandma in new york for awhile.
???
SouthBayDem
(33,135 posts)Or are they trolling?
jmowreader
(52,901 posts)4:46 flight on American from Gainesville
To Charlotte as destination: $255.
Through Charlotte to JFK: $92.
No wonder the airlines are mad.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Maybe they haven't seen the price of FUEL lately.
How the heck do they make any money on a $92 ticket?
jmowreader
(52,901 posts)Here's the Big Secret of the airline industry: Cargo pays the bills. They can pack enough freight into the cargo holds of a 737-800 that they can fly the jet from Charlotte to New York with very few passengers aboard and still operate profitably - and they've got contracts that ensure the hold is full.
On the other hand, you cannot pack enough freight into the cargo holds of an Embraer E-jet - which is what was supposed to get this guy out of Florida if they hadn't figured out what he was doing - to subsidize the cost of his ticket.
I just checked the airline I always fly and it seems that you can't skiplag on that airline.
If I wanted to fly from Spokane to Seattle it would cost $79.
From Seattle to JFK it would cost $259.
Add them together and you get $338.
But if I buy a Spokane-JFK ticket it is $333. However, to save that five bucks I've got to leave Spokane extremely early, so to me it's worth it to pay the extra and spend a night in Seattle. Seattle is fun so to me it's worth it.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)Average prices are about 50% lower than 1980
RocRizzo55
(980 posts)Another symptom of late stage capitalism, and the impending collapse.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)It only recently made the news.
DFW
(59,730 posts)The last time we took them on a long haul flight, it was a round trip in business class from Frankfurt to Dallas and back.
On the return leg, we were at the check-in counter in Dallas two hours before departure time. Instead of checking us in right away, the agent let us wait right in front of him (the other agents were "busy serving other customers" ) while he "took a phone call" which lasted 90 minutes, and then told us we were too late to check in. He then referred us to an American Airlines supervisor who told us, without even looking at a computer screen, that all other flights to Europe on American and all airlines were full, and we'd have to get a hotel (at our expense) and take the flight the next day. They had overbooked the flight and didn't want to pay compensation. I talked to someone I know who works for AA, as well as one of their pilots, and they said flat out that it was a dirty game that American played to save money. Their whole company knew it, but no one dared say so on the record, or they'd be unemployed the next day.
Anyone that figures out any trick that saves the passenger money and gives less of it to American Airlines is a hero in my book. My outfit is based in Dallas, and we spend many millions with American Airlines every year, with many platinum members. They don't care. They still treat us like shit. I'd bet that Albanian Airlines is better, and I don't even know if there is an Albanian Airlines.
jvill
(459 posts)All this is is the airlines got caught in their overly complicated pricing games and are trying to use their lawyers - saying its against their made up rules - to protect their overpriced offering that REAL competition would drive down.
Zero sympathy.
DFW
(59,730 posts)Once they have your money, they can do with you what they like. Sometimes, you luck out, and get airline employees who remember they are dealing with other people, but you really have to get lucky. One time, in Paris, there was a delay at security, and I got to the departure gate after the last bus had left for the tarmac where my plane back to Germany was waiting. The agent, who could have closed up and sent me back to the ticket counter, instead called to his dispatcher, told them not to close the doors to the plane, went outside, flagged down the first Air France vehicle that drove by, told the driver to wait, and personally drove me and one other passenger to the plane.
But then, there WAS that day in Dallas where AA left us to rot in the terminal. Not just us, either. There was a family from Bosnia on our flight, trying to get home to see a dying relative. American Airlines just left them there crying on the floor, while their agents were "busy assisting other customers."
FakeNoose
(40,185 posts)Kind of like at the grocery stores where we scan and pack our own purchases, pay by credit card, grab our receipt and walk out the door. It's possible to buy a week's groceries and never interact with a store employee. This suits some people, while others prefer to stand in line and wait for the store employee to do the work.
If American Airlines had an auto check-in line, you could have been issued a boarding pass before they sold your seat to someone else. What the check-in guy did to you was inexcusable and it deserves to be called out. I think our Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg is getting controls in place to stop this kind of thing from happening. Your ticket was paid for, they already had your money in advance, but they continued selling more seats for the same flight.
bahboo
(16,953 posts)about once a year I end up having to fly American. Something ALWAYS happens. Now what are the odds of that? Even though the connections are better for me, I would never choose to fly American unless absolutely necessary.
CaptainTruth
(8,048 posts)For the past few (maybe more?) years my wife & I have been able to check-in online (on our phones) 24 hours before the flight for all our domestic & European flights. We LOVE it. Big improvement!
Also, you probably know this, but many years ago I learned that if I'm not getting service at the airport it's better to call the airline. Many times I've had cancelled/missed flights & I headed to the customer service desk & got in line behind 100 other people but I also called the airline & every time I was able to get rebooked on another flight in about 5 minutes & walk away from the line while those other 100 folks stood waiting.
It seems like you travel a lot so I'm sure you already know this, I'm posting it mainly as advice for my DU friends who may not know.
Edit to add: Not sure about your experience with them, but a couple times I've flown Lufthansa to/from Europe & had my itinerary absolutely go down in flames due to circumstances beyond their control, & they were ON TOP of the situation! Once when I arrived in Munich (an unplanned stop on the way to Milan) about 10 hours behind schedule (long painful story, almost everything that possibly could go wrong did go wrong) when I got off the plane they had a representative at the gate looking for me, & they had already rebooked me on the next flight to Milan & they handed me my ticket & gave me directions to the gate. I was floored! No way I could have asked for more.
DFW
(59,730 posts)I have NEVER gotten through to American Airlines on the phone. I'm sure someone must know how to do that, but we didn't. When even employees (one is a pilot!) of that airline tell us how awful their customer service policy is, there is probably something behind it.
Lufthansa USED to have absolutely horrible customer service. So did Air France. Air France woke up first, so I switched to them. I used to be top tier frequent flyer with Lufthansa decades ago, and got treated like crap just once too often. When they sent me a form letter reminding me that my elite status was in danger of expiring, I sent them a long letter detailing why it was not only in danger of expiring, but was dying a deliberately intended death. I surprisingly got a long detailed letter from a higher up at LH, saying that my letter had made the rounds with senior management, and it had caused serious concern. They said they would make serious inquiries as to just what their frequent travelers thought was lacking, and try to address it all. It seems they might have improved since I abandoned them.
Several years ago, there was a passenger poaching war on between Lufthansa and Air France. If you flew business class from Germany to North America, you could save about 50% by flying on Air France and changing planes in Paris. The same rang true the other way. If you flew to North America from France, but used Lufthansa, changing in either Frankfurt or Munich, you could save 50% over what the price was on Air France departing from Paris. This doesn't seem to be the case any more, but I don't know for sure. I am now platinum for life on Air France-KLM(-Delta), so I always take them if I have a choice, especially now that Air France finally flies to Dallas. For me, the cruelest effect of Covid was that Delta eliminated their nonstop between Atlanta and Düsseldorf. This route has just been reinstated. When I fly home next Saturday, I will fly from Dulles down to Atlanta, have some of the great food offered in the Delta lounge in the terminal where the overseas flights leave from, and then get on the plane and arrive 16 minutes from my house at the Düsseldorf airport. Lufthansa has practically abandoned nonstop routes between Düsseldorf and North America, preferring to make everyone change in either Frankfurt or Munich. Since Frankfurt and Munich are farther east than Düsseldorf, I'd have to go extra mileage to change planes there. I prefer doing it in Paris or Amsterdam.
CaptainTruth
(8,048 posts)I understand. I've spent so much time on planes & flown all around the world, it can be challenging to figure out what works best.
Usually I felt like I was in reasonably good hands, exept for Air China domestic flights to remote parts of the country where the only other option was a 6-hour boat ride up a river followed by 4-5 hours bouncing on a dirt road in the middle of nowhere, which yes, I did once.
That was the only time in all my travels our corporate accounting department called me to confirm the numbers on my expense report were correct, & yes, the "all you can eat dumpling breakfast" was $0.50, at the exchange rate I got from the guy on the street corner, because if you're smart you know the locals pay a significant premium for US$ so you don't use banks to exchange currency there.
Oh the memories!
DFW
(59,730 posts)I have never been to Mainland China. My path just never led me there. My wife and my job led me to Europe, and that has been mostly where I have stayed. I speak no Asian languages--at least, not enough to have an extended conversation--and I do speak nine European languages (ten, if you count Schwyzerdüütsch/Alemannic). So I went where logic (and a beautiful tall blonde German woman) led me.
bucolic_frolic
(54,049 posts)Their fares make no sense to the public, or to logic.
Vinca
(53,353 posts)to have an empty seat complete the flight, the seat is still paid for. They should rethink their pricing.
DFW
(59,730 posts)We both had to travel from Boston to Chattanooga. He remarked that people in the know who had only hand luggage, and were flying from Boston or New York to Atlanta could fly cheaper by booking through to Chattanooga, but getting off in Atlanta. Since Chattanooga was north of Atlanta, and the fare was based on distance, it was cheaper, even though you always had to change in Atlanta (in the South, you ALWAYS have to change in Atlanta). Delta was aware of this, but never did anything about it, as it wasn't worth the aggravation.
By the way, it is common knowledge among us "Suthenuz" that when you die and go to heaven, you STILL have to change in Atlanta.
Vinca
(53,353 posts)where I saw my first jumbo jet. Weird how things pop out of the back of your mind like that. Must be an old age thing.
IronLionZion
(50,820 posts)instead of lowering prices or some other solution.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)Security Concerns: Skiplagging can raise security concerns for airlines. If a passenger is not present on a flight but their luggage is, it can trigger security protocols and potentially cause delays or disruptions.
If you check your luggage through to the final destination but disembark at the layover point, there is a chance that your bags will continue to the final destination without you. Retrieving your bags mid-journey can be challenging and may result in logistical difficulties.
Karma13612
(4,919 posts)Just buy the few clothes you need when you get to your destination. Just take a carryon bag.
This policy they have against skiplagging is of their own making. Charging obscenely more for direct flights is usury in my book.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)Otherwise they risk getting nothing at all and losing passengers to competitors. Yes, policies are of their own making and they're trying to maximize profits on the less competitive routes/destinations. It doesn't benefit EVERY passenger equally, but I guess that's how it goes.
I suppose it's possible that the airlines could become regulated again. Maybe that would help to make things more equitable (more expensive?) who knows? I guess that remains to be seen.
Some argue that removing airline regulation encourages innovation and competition, leading to lower airfares and increased options for travelers. And that it allows airlines to operate more efficiently, respond to market demands, and offer tailored services. Market forces, rather than government intervention, are better suited to drive the growth and improvement of the airline industry.
But others counter with the argument that airline regulation is crucial for ensuring passenger safety, fair pricing, and maintaining healthy competition. Also, they say that it protects consumers from predatory practices, promotes efficient operations, and prevents monopolistic behavior. Presumably, by reinstating airline regulation, we can safeguard the interests of travelers and foster a more equitable and reliable aviation industry.
stopdiggin
(15,034 posts)would deliberately check luggage to a destination they have no intention of going to. And that would go double for the (skip fare) individual that is trying to shave dollars.
Oopsie Daisy
(6,670 posts)Karma13612
(4,919 posts)Was due to detonate.
So, plane explodes and terrorist is sipping tea at the last stop.
🤷♀️
People are forced to skiplag because the ticket pricing is price gouging.
stopdiggin
(15,034 posts)a couple times up-string). But the skip-lag passenger, attempting to reduce his fare (as is the subject of this post) - has absolutely no incentive to check luggage that he will never see again (and would most often have to pay an additional price for). It just simply doesn't make any sense.
Hotler
(13,735 posts)Isn't that what the yellow cord above the seat is for? To let the pilot know you're getting off at the next stop.
erronis
(22,660 posts)Or want another scotch? But yes, the taxpayers are unwitting owners of lots of failed enterprises.
I wonder if D.B. Cooper pulled that cord?
Farmer-Rick
(12,480 posts)And act like they are doing you a favor.
When flying to Hartford, I carefully booked times and layovers to coincide with some relatives' travel. And paid a bit more to avoid excessive layovers and waits.
Don't you know, 2 weeks before the flight, Delta changed my times and I got stuck with a 3 hour layover in Atlanta and arriving 4 hours too early to meet my relatives. And the hours they gave me were the cheaper flights but I had paid extra for the more timely flights that they did not give me. It a scam.
oldsoftie
(13,538 posts)If I book JAX to NY but get off in Charlotte, my ticket has me boarding to go home in NY not Charlotte.
How do I get back to JAX?
muriel_volestrangler
(105,562 posts)They noticed in Gainesville he had an NC driver's license, and stopped him from boarding the plane at all, until he bought a standard ticket to Charlotte. And then banned him for 3 years. In general, it seems people buy one-way tickets to do this.
SWBTATTReg
(26,039 posts)trips include segments (short-haul) where passengers can get off and save money (like the above).
Before when it was an issue, the prices paid on some long-distance calls vs. instate calls were the same way. Instate calls (the long distance calls instate) were more expensive than the interstate calls. Main reason was that Public Service Commissions allowed this pricing discrepancy to exist.
Wonder how many other industries have these weird pricing models? Perhaps services such as Greyhound, etc.?
mopinko
(73,315 posts)when arthur c clarke said that in the future there would be no such thing as a long distance phone call. ppl said he was nuts. couldnt believe the phone companies would let go of the extra dough.
SWBTATTReg
(26,039 posts)go of the fact that with these data calls, you really don't know where the call truly originated or terminated (gets into a FEP (Front End Processor)), you couldn't charge the normal rate for such calls.
Distance-insensitive type of calls. They freaked out (I was in data processing at the time, and we were bringing in a data ntwk (vs. a voice network)).
MorbidButterflyTat
(4,189 posts)that in the future there would be no such thing as a long distance phone call. ..couldnt believe the phone companies would let go of the extra dough."
Did they, tho? I'm old enough to remember when a monthly phone bill was 25 or 30 bucks. And, my parents had to pay a monthly rental fee for the phone!
I wonder how comparable AT&T and other phone companies pricing is now. You sometimes get offered a "free" phone as long as you commit to being price gouged for years and if you break the contract, it's gonna cost you.
Clarke was right. They never let go of extra dough, and they get a heck of a lot more now.
Ursus Rex
(473 posts)I worked for telcos for ~15 years. This is tremendously over-generalized, but "Analog" (i.e., POTS, copper landlines, etc) are regulated as utilities, whereas "digital" (i.e., VOIP, fiber, etc) are not regulated to the same extent. AT&T still has a monopoly on certain types of phone infrastructure but they must maintain a certain level of service, and because it's physical, it requires more workers with very specific skills (who are also unionized), field service, etc. I grew up with storms, etc., that would take out power and I kept an actual old-fashioned (copper-based) landline but AT&T more and more frequently raised prices until it was like $150/month for basic service (which, true, these days includes caller ID and stuff that didn't exist in 1975 for the vast majority of customers). The margins on that are far lower than with cell phones/VOIP, so AT&T uses price pressure to drive people to the cell/digital solution.
Just my slightly-jaundiced take.
Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
cbabe This message was self-deleted by its author.
flying_wahini
(8,248 posts)I did it on Turkish airlines; laid over for 2 nights in Istanbul on my way to Prague.
CaptainTruth
(8,048 posts)In my younger life I worked a job that required a lot of travel, domestic & international, for my coworkers & I, & we would sometimes save money by "nesting" tickets when we had to make multiple trips to the same location over a few months.
Basically it involves buying tickets for 2 round trips with dates that overlap, then using a ticket from the first round-trip & a ticket from the second round-trip for the first trip, then using a ticket from the second round-trip & the first round-trip for the second trip.
It's hard to explain, but you could save money. For example, at the time business class (remember that???) tickets for flights to the US originating in Europe were usually cheaper than business class tickets for flights originating in the US going to Europe. So if, for example, you knew you were going to make 2 trips to London (where our UK office was located) you could book one flight US>UK>US & another flight UK>US>UK (cheaper) with overlapping ("nested"
dates, & mix up the tickets to save money.
If you Google "nested airline tickets" you'll find better explanations than I can give:
https://www.google.com/search?q=nested+airline+tickets]
tavernier
(14,269 posts)all night because AA couldnt locate a pilot for her 9 pm flight which was canceled at midnight. She had given up her seat that morning on an overbooked flight. No good deed goes unpunished.
I hope they lose their lawsuit.
Martin68
(27,061 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 20, 2023, 05:31 PM - Edit history (1)
the way to the final destination. Like if you buy a movie ticket you can't walk out in the middle? If you book hotel you can't leave early?
Karma13612
(4,919 posts)Their anti-skiplagging policy is not a law. They are manipulating ticket prices and price gouging.
The consumer protection agency (FTC????) should be all over this crap.
What happens if you actually get off the plane and just miss getting back on! How can they prove your intent and have the audacity to charge you or ban you from flying with them again????
Its ridiculous!
Martin68
(27,061 posts)I think this is totally fair. Lower rates and improved service is all we ask.
Karma13612
(4,919 posts)róisín_dubh
(12,231 posts)Though not intentionally. In both instances, my continuing flights were so delayed that it wouldve been much longer to sit and wait than to get a one-way car rental and drive home. Both times were after long trans-Atlantic flights and I did not have the bandwidth to sit in the airport.
As Id already collected my luggage for transfer, it wasnt a huge problem.
Xolodno
(7,314 posts)I'm sure they are using a complex algorithm which results in inefficiencies.
Another tip, use incognito mode when looking at airfare. It used to be speculated that travel sites and airlines were tracking you to edge you into purchasing. Forgot where I read, but for some, it was confirmed.
jgmiller
(670 posts)We were flying from LAX to Erie, PA through Cleveland. When we got to Cleveland a family member didn't want to get on the very small plane for the final leg. Since we needed to rent a car anyway and Erie is a 90 minute drive I went to the counter to get our luggage off before it was transferred to the smaller plane.
The agent told us that if we did this she would have to cancel our return flight and charge us much higher fee for the return from Cleveland direct to LAX. She told me the reason for this was that the government subsidized flights to smaller airports and they needed to recoup the money for the missing fares on the smaller plane.
I'm not sure if that's still the case but in a twisted way it made sense.
harun
(11,380 posts)ChatGPT says about the subsidies:
Yes, many governments around the world have implemented subsidies or financial support programs to encourage flights to smaller airports, especially in rural or less populated areas. These subsidies are often aimed at maintaining essential air connectivity, promoting regional development, and boosting local economies.
These subsidies can take various forms, such as:
1. **Route Subsidies
* Governments may provide financial incentives to airlines to operate specific routes between larger airports and smaller regional airports that might not be economically viable otherwise.
2. **Airport Infrastructure Funding
* Governments may allocate funds to upgrade or maintain the infrastructure of smaller airports, making them more attractive to airlines.
3. **Reduced Fees and Charges
* Governments may lower landing fees, fuel taxes, or other charges for airlines operating at smaller airports, making it more cost-effective for them to provide service.
4. **Guaranteed Revenue Programs
* In some cases, governments may guarantee a certain level of revenue to airlines operating at smaller airports, reducing the financial risk associated with low passenger numbers.
5. **Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs)
* Governments might enter into partnerships with private companies to invest in and operate smaller airports, with the aim of improving services and increasing air traffic.
6. **Community Air Services
* In remote or isolated regions, governments might directly fund air services as a crucial means of transportation for residents, medical needs, and other essential services.
These subsidies can vary widely depending on the country, the specific region, and the aviation policies in place. They can help maintain crucial air connections to underserved areas and stimulate economic activity by facilitating travel and trade. However, these programs also have to be carefully managed to ensure they achieve their intended goals efficiently and transparently.