Early lab tests suggest new Covid-19 variant BA.2.86 may be less contagious and less immune-evasive
Source: CNN Health
Published 8:55 PM EDT, Sun September 3, 2023
CNN Scientists around the world are fast-tracking lab experiments to try to understand the highly mutated BA.2.86 variant of the virus that causes Covid-19. Results just beginning to emerge are offering some reassurance, experts say.
Two groups one in China and one in Sweden have publicly reported results, and more are expected as early as Monday from the United States. So far, early results paint BA.2.86 as more of a paper tiger rather than the looming beast it first appeared to be, although that impression could change as more results come in.
BA.2.86, also known by the nickname Pirola, captured the worlds attention because it looks radically different than any other variants of the coronavirus that weve seen so far.
This new lineage has more than 30 changes to its spike protein compared with both its next closest ancestor, BA.2, and compared with the recently circulating XBB.1.5 lineage. It was an evolutionary leap on par with the one the original Omicron variant, BA.1, made when it first appeared almost two years ago and everyone remembers how that went down.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/03/health/covid-new-variant-pirola-early-lab-results/index.html
Full headline: Early lab tests suggest new Covid-19 variant BA.2.86 may be less contagious and less immune-evasive than feared
From President Biden's former COVID Response Coordinator Dr. Ashish Jha -
Link to tweet
@ashishkjha
·
Follow
We now have the 2nd lab reporting neutralization data on BA.2.86
And the news is better than I was expecting
And makes me more encouraged that the new upcoming vaccine will have a real benefit against current dominant variant (EG.5) as well as BA.2.86
More data coming soon
Ben Murrell
@BenjMurrell
Real-time data update: we've got our first BA.2.86 (see red arrow) neutralization results. Short 🧵with much credit to @DannySheward and the rest of the team.
Image
7:41 PM · Sep 1, 2023
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,739 posts)We do not need another COVID wave
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)that variant (and its relatives) aren't really responsible for the current uptick. It appears that it's mostly XBB 1.x. variants running their course.

It will remain to be seen if one of the BA.2.x variants can emerge to out-compete.
Farmer-Rick
(12,462 posts)There is no noticable uptick in deaths during the last 2 weeks.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)so with the much more noticeable uptick in hospitalizations now, we'll have to wait probably about a month to see that begin to get reflected. The treatment protocols for COVID have improved considerably, including for those hospitalized, but eventually some may still succumb.
(in many cases, it's also the time it takes medical examiners/coroners to make the determination for cause, sign off on the death certificate, and get that reported up the chain, etc.).
Blues Heron
(8,323 posts)From the CDC
Total Deaths
1,139,457
Trend in % COVID-19 Deaths
+17.6% in most recent week
Save a life and mask up peeps! The life you save just might be your own or a loved ones.
Farmer-Rick
(12,462 posts)I was following daily deaths. When it got down to less than 200 deaths a day, it was at flu level death rates and I felt safe going out without masks. But now I can't find total daily deaths per day in the US from COVID. The CDC website says it stop tracking daily deaths as of March 2021.
So, if you got a hard number of daily deaths let me know. Because 17.6% of that accumulated death number doesn't mean anything for me, it's a huge number to grasp. That accumulated number can't be compared to flu daily death rates.
Blues Heron
(8,323 posts)I think (from memory I looked at the chart a couple of days ago) the low at end of june was 480 deaths in a week, now its grown to 640/week, so still under 100 /day.
THe new CDC numbers are updated on the tracker on Mondays,and reflect the week ending ten days before . but yesterday was a holiday. We will see what they look like later this evening.
Farmer-Rick
(12,462 posts)I never thought to look at weekly deaths. Sometimes my brain hiccups.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Two years of pandemic. Then 40 years of 'it is what it is'.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)Well the "Spanish Flu" is still circulating over a century later, but given that era's lack of the type of sophisticated epidemiological and medical technology that we have today, let alone not even having a grasp of what we commonly know as "DNA", "RNA", and genetic profiling, SARS-CoV-2 has been a much more deadly entity than that "flu" from a century ago (and particularly so had no drastic interventions been done including having the availability of vaccines early on after its initial appearance).
With its often detrimental impact on other critical organs of the body, which is a feature of SARS-CoV2 and not a bug when compared to "a flu", it will probably take many years to get to a point when it can be considered "it is what it is".
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)"The Spanish flu was the name given to a form of influenza (flu) caused by an H1N1 virus that started in some type of bird (avian origin). The Spanish flu was a pandemic a new influenza A virus that spread easily and infected people throughout the world. Because the virus was new, very few people, if any, had some immunity to the disease.
From 1918 to 1919, the Spanish flu infected an estimated 500 million people globally. This amounted to about 33% of the worlds population at the time. In addition, the Spanish flu killed about 50 million people. About 675,000 of the deaths were in the U.S."
From the Cleveland Clinic website.
It's highly unlikely the longterm effects are any different than any other respiratory infection. We've just spent an unheard of amount of money studying it.
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Blues Heron
(8,323 posts)Its a totally unrelated virus. Spanish flu was a version of the inFLUenza virus, COVID-19 is caused by a CORONAVIRUS - not the same thing at all.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)During that 1918 pandemic, that particularly impacted MY city thanks to the arrogance of holding a "Liberty Bond" parade in the midst of the pandemic, when there was no knowledge of "gene sequencing" or mRNA vaccines... or much of anything resembling a "vaccine", right there pretty much guaranteed a death sentence.
I'll repost some, from here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2902495

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/2020/05/22/second-wave-coronavirus-spanish-flu-1918-philadelphia-st-louis-influenza-deaths-covid-19/3085405001/
We were determined not to make that same mistake again.
Link to tweet
@BradNitzWSB
This graph shows why social distancing is so important.
In 1918 Philadelphia did not, but St. Louis did. Lets all work to minimize our numbers now. This is temporary.
Image
3:30 PM · Mar 12, 2020

And you also seemed to have missed the entire mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 and its use of ACE-2 receptors for "landing zones" to attach and enter cells. I don't know how many posts I have done on that. Those receptors are not just located in the respiratory system (although that is the predominate place and is what causes "COVID pneumonia" ) but are also on the kidneys and in the digestive system as well as in the circulatory system (notably the heart), and neurological system.

Depending on where that virus lands, the organ can and has become damaged - one of the most common organs being the kidneys where you had many early on end up on dialysis.
For example as posted here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=2904484
And from here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=340798
The above are organs where those ACE-2 receptor sites are located (at varying degrees).
I.e., it can be more than just a "respiratory" virus because of that ACE-2 thing.
The "flu" does not do this and what you just posted is just mind-boggling.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Anyone expect from another anonymous person on the internet.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)and am still trying to get an answer regarding whether you have any kind of degree or training in actual "science", which would be helpful rather than the endless regurgitation of tweets.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)field rather than annonymous 'non experts' on DU.
Be sure to watch today for Prof Veldoens thread on why we shouldn't be worried about new variants or some new enormous covid surge.
You would learn a lot!
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)but if you have no clear understanding about what they are saying, then you completely lose the context of it.
We watched while people completely dismissed Delta, because "summer time" and "everyone is outside" and people were encouraged to "throw off their masks and hug their grandkids". And we watched like deer in headlights when Delta didn't "follow the rules" and hit like a ton of bricks "out of season" - and that was when vaccines had finally been available for most of the population save for the under 18s.
But then as that one began to wane, Omicron was being reported in South Africa, and that was also dismissed - enough to have the U.S. lift the overseas travel ban. And right after that happened, all hell broke loose.
Does this mean that BA.2.86 is going to be like that? ABSOLUTELY NOT. It just means that we should know the fucking drill by now. Get boosted, get your masks out, wash your hands. It's really just that simple.

And I suggest you start watching "the experts" on both the FDA VRBPAC and CDC ACIP meetings. YOU might learn something. I have most of their slide decks as well.
Links to many of the streams are in these LBN OPs that I have posted below (ETA and when I say "I" have posted, these are literally MY LBN OPs) -
FDA approves first RSV vaccine for pregnancy to protect newborns
COVID vaccine program for uninsured could be late to pharmacies
Moderna's COVID-19 vaccine safest, most effective for older adults, study says
West Virginia's COVID vaccine lottery under scrutiny over cost of prizes, tax issues
FDA Revokes Authorization of J&J's Covid Vaccine as Demand Wane
FDA approves world's first RSV vaccine, a shot for adults ages 60 and up
Mpox outbreak was wake-up call for smallpox preparation, vaccine maker Bavarian Nordic says
Biden's COVID vaccine rule for federal contractors was valid, US court rules
FDA advisors recommend replacing original Covid vaccine with bivalent omicron shots for all doses
Senate sends Biden military bill that would lift Covid vaccine mandate for troops and authorize more Ukraine funding
Moderna sues Pfizer/BioNTech for patent infringement over COVID vaccine
Pfizer seeks OK of updated COVID vaccine booster for fall
U.S. CDC advisers back Novavax COVID vaccine for adults
FDA gives emergency use authorization to Novavax's Covid-19 vaccine
CDC panel recommends Moderna two-dose Covid vaccine for kids ages 6 to 17
FDA authorizes coronavirus vaccine for young kids with shots likely next week
UPDATED: FDA panel endorses Covid vaccine for youngest children
F.D.A. advisers recommend that the agency authorize Moderna's vaccine for children 6 to 17.
FDA says Moderna vaccine for youngest children is safe and effective
Opponents of federal vaccine mandate seek rehearing
A company with an early contract to produce coronavirus vaccine hid evidence of problems.
Moderna asks the F.D.A. to authorize its vaccine for children under 6
If you got J&J vaccine, consider two mRNA booster shots, CDC data suggest
Moderna says its coronavirus vaccine for young children is safe, but efficacy is...more complicated
A new Covid vaccine shows 100 percent efficacy against severe disease and hospitalizations
Coronavirus vaccine for young children further delayed as FDA says it will wait for data
J.&J. Pauses Production of Its Covid Vaccine Despite Persistent Need
Pfizer applies to the F.D.A. for a two-shot vaccine for children under 5, despite mixed trial result
FDA authorizes Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine booster shots for 16- and 17-year-olds
Pfizer says blood samples showed a third dose of its vaccine provides significant protection against
New York City sets sweeping vaccine mandate for all private employers.
With federal sign-offs, all American adults now eligible for coronavirus vaccine boosters
The U.S. aims to lift Covid vaccine manufacturing to create a billion doses a year.
White House vaccine rule would require companies and workers to comply by Jan. 4
CDC signs off on children's coronavirus vaccine, allowing providers to begin immunizing kids
CDC panel unanimously recommends Pfizer Covid vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11 in critical step toward
Supreme Court Won't Block Maine's Vaccine Mandate for Health Care Workers
FDA authorizes Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine for children 5 to 11
FDA panel recommends Pfizer's low-dose Covid vaccine for kids ages 5 to 11
FDA panel recommends a booster shot of Johnson & Johnson vaccine for people 18 and older
Pfizer Asks F.D.A. to Authorize Its Covid-19 Vaccine for Children 5 to 11
YouTube is banning prominent anti-vaccine activists and blocking all anti-vaccine content
Federal judges: NYC can impose vaccine mandate on teachers
Biden to get booster shot of Pfizer vaccine in front of news media
A Federal Judge Blocks A Vaccine Mandate For NYC Teachers
CDC backs Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine booster shots for millions of seniors and some others
CDC advisers recommend certain adults get booster dose of Pfizer's Covid-19 vaccine
Second dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine increases protection against covid-19, maker says
Low dose of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is safe and effective in children ages 5 to 11
FDA vaccine advisers vote to recommend booster doses of Covid-19 vaccine in people 65 and older
U.S. to buy hundreds of millions more doses of Pfizer vaccine to donate to the world
Biden to announce sweeping vaccine mandates as he unveils new Covid strategy
Philly public schools to mandate COVID-19 vaccine
Pentagon to mandate COVID-19 vaccine for military
The F.D.A. is aiming to give full approval to Pfizer's Covid vaccine on Monday.
President Biden and first lady Jill Biden to get coronavirus vaccine boosters
CDC advisers back third vaccine doses for immunocompromised people
CDC guidance now official: Pregnant women should get coronavirus vaccine
Anti-vaccine protesters tried to storm the BBC's offices. But they had the wrong address.
WHO calls for moratorium on Covid vaccine boosters at least through September
F.D.A. Aims to Give Final Approval to Pfizer Vaccine by Early Next Month
CA Mandates COVID Vaccine Proof For State Employees, Health-Care Workers
V.A. Issues Employee Vaccine Mandate, a First for a Federal Agency
Moderna says that its vaccine is effective for 12- to 17-year-olds and that it will seek F.D.A. auth
Biden says US will send 20M more vaccine doses to other countries
CDC advisers recommend coronavirus vaccine for 12- to 15-year-olds
FDA authorizes Pfizer coronavirus vaccine for adolescents 12 to 15 years old
Pfizer and BioNTech apply for full U.S. approval for their Covid vaccine.
W.H.O. approves China's Sinopharm vaccine for emergency use.
Baltimore Vaccine Plant's Troubles Ripple Across 3 Continents
Biden to set new goal of 70 percent of Americans getting at least one vaccine dose by July 4
White House plans to redistribute unordered vaccine supply, telling states: Use it or lose it
U.S. to share up to 60 million doses of AstraZeneca coronavirus vaccine with other countries
J.&J.s vaccine should carry warning of potential risk for rare blood clots, the E.U.s regulator says
CDC vaccine advisers seek more data on rare blood clots before deciding whether to resume J&J shots
UPDATE: U.S. Calls for Pause on Johnson & Johnson Vaccine After Clotting Cases
AstraZeneca's coronavirus vaccine plausibly linked to rare brain clots, European regulators say
Johnson & Johnson Covid-19 vaccine is delayed by a U.S. factory mix-up.
Biden moves up timeline for when enough vaccine doses will be available for all adults: end of May
Biden to announce 'historic partnership': Merck will help make Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine
CDC advisers recommend Johnson & Johnson single-dose vaccine, paving the way for inoculations
FDA authorizes Johnson & Johnson's single-shot coronavirus vaccine, adding to the nation's arsenal
FDA advisers recommend authorization of Johnson & Johnson single-dose coronavirus vaccine
FDA review confirms safety and efficacy of single-shot Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine
F.D.A. Agrees Moderna Can Increase Vaccine Supply in Each Vial
Biden to announce his administration has secured 200 million additional vaccine doses promised
EU regulators recommend authorization of AstraZeneca's Covid-19 vaccine
Single-shot Johnson & Johnson vaccine 66 percent effective against moderate and severe illness
Novavax's Vaccine Works Well -- Except on Variant First Found in South Africa
Biden administration seeks to buy 200 million more vaccine doses, to be delivered through the summer
Moderna Says Vaccine Still Protects Against Virus Variants
Pfizer Will Ship Fewer Vaccine Vials to Account for 'Extra' Doses
The Trump administration bailed out prominent anti-vaccine groups during a pandemic
Biden lays out covid vaccine plan, with goal of 100 million shots administered in 100 days
Vaccine reserve was already exhausted when Trump administration vowed to release it
Trump administration reverses stance, will no longer hold back second shots of coronavirus vaccine
FDA authorizes a second coronavirus vaccine, a turning point in the pandemic
FDA advisers recommend second coronavirus vaccine, with agency action expected soon
FDA review clears path for second coronavirus vaccine, this one developed by Moderna
The first vaccine has been given in New York beginning America's most ambitious vaccination campaign
A C.D.C. panel has endorsed the Pfizer vaccine for people 16 and over.
Covid-19 vaccine shipments to begin leaving Pfizer's Kalamazoo facility on Sunday
F.D.A. Clears Pfizer Vaccine, and Millions of Doses Will Be Shipped Right Away
White House orders FDA chief to authorize Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine Friday or submit his resignation
FDA advisers recommend Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine, with agency action expected soon
FDA review confirms safety and efficacy of Pfizer coronavirus vaccine
Moderna to ask the FDA to greenlight its coronavirus vaccine
Pfizer and BioNTech will seek regulatory clearance of their coronavirus vaccine
Pfizer and BioNTech say final analysis shows coronavirus vaccine is 95% effective
Pfizer's coronavirus vaccine is more than 90 percent effective in first analysis, company reports
Russia unveils coronavirus vaccine, claiming victory in global race before final testing is complete
I know you won't look at them because news sources are "anonymous internet".
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)I think you need to take a break from the computer.
Seriously.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Nearly every death is preventable, said Dr. Ashish Jha, who was until recently President Joe Bidens top COVID adviser. We are at a point where almost everybody whos up to date on their vaccines and gets treated if they have COVID, they rarely end up in the hospital, they almost never die.
That is also true for most high-risk people, Jha pointed out, including older adults such as his parents, who are in their 80s and people whose immune systems are compromised. Even for most not all, but most immunocompromised people, vaccines are actually still quite effective at preventing against serious illness, he said. There has been a lot of bad information out there that somehow if youre immunocompromised that vaccines dont work.
That excess deaths have fallen close to zero helps to make this point: If COVID were still a dire threat to large numbers of people, that would show up in the data.
https://www.sanjuandailystar.com/post/a-positive-covid-19-milestone
Take the L. Please.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)but that you are attempting to mindlessly argue about. Jha is saying nothing different than what Fauci has said during the worst of the pandemic before retiring, and who continues to say this during appearances when asked about it.
The vaccines are not "cures". They help the body to create the right type of antibodies and other "defenses" to "attack", and break down the virus, while other processes "clear the debris" created after the viruses are broken down. Then the next time the body encounters a similar-looking "intruder", it has that "memory", and will call out the newly learned-about defenses again - but this time a bit quicker.
The key here is whether the new "intruder" is similar enough to trigger those defenses and that's why epidemiologists follow those mutations so that vaccines can be adjusted to adapt to any changes. It's as simple as that.
SARS-CoV-2 has gone through many transitions through mutations (mostly of its spike proteins) over the past 3 years, that have affected how it infects someone and what it does when it it does infect someone.
But one of the most fascinating things to come out of this whole tragedy has been the evolution and deployment of mRNA vaccines. These are truly a game-changer, because not only are they being successfully used for COVID, but are being worked on for Influenza and other viruses, where at some point in the near future, there is expected to be a "universal" vaccine able to trigger the right type of immune reaction to thwart many classes of viruses, not just a narrow subset.
THIS is what I am focused on.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)Take a look at this cool "misinformation".

But then as a non-scientist, you might get indoctrinated by that "truth bomb"!
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Adios.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)who is "stuck on stupid", but that's how life can be sometimes.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Farmer-Rick
(12,462 posts)It was originally hypothesized that the Spanish flu came from pigs. It did not. It came from birds like you said.
We humans actually gave it to the pigs.
BComplex
(9,745 posts)Home tests haven't been consistently reliable from what I understand, actually for the whole history of COVID.
Last edited Mon Sep 4, 2023, 01:32 PM - Edit history (1)
The tests don't last long enough. I wish they had a 5-year exp date or something so you could stock up on them. I buy a few, and they're expired by the time I want to use them.
ProfessorGAC
(75,833 posts)In a sealed package, and kept away from water or excessive heat, there is no reasonable chemical mechanism that cause breakdown of any of the components of the kit.
There should be no expiration date.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)they are probably still doing stability studies on them so maybe they will be extended further.
I think there is a buffer solution used for it and that might be the determining factor for stability (and the expiration date).
ProfessorGAC
(75,833 posts)...if kept cool & dry.
There is no expiration date on sealed jars of sodium citrate, or borate, or phosphate.
In fact, good laboratory practice requires dating a jar once it is opened.
In an audit, nobody looks for an expiration date of an unopened bottle of salt. (The vast majority of buffers are salts.) But, they do check items tagged, and listed in system procedures as required to tag.
Finally, as they are well-sealed, they knew from the beginning that there was no degradation mechanism. Lots of good chemists at those companies.
It's a rubberstamp reaction to regs, and rather than push back on a needless requirement, they just went along.
Could part of that be the rush to get these useful kits to market? Definitely, yes.
But, they've been out nearly 3 years now & I don't see how stability studies wouldn't be done when everybody knew there was no way for them to degrade is most irritating.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)isn't a lab and no one really knows how these kits (or their components) are stored before final packaging and being shipped to pharmacies (including non-air-conditioned brown trucks
).
And this is not even taking into consideration that these are "consumer test kits", not "lab grade" medical test devices, and the solution is not in (glass) "jars" but in plastic tubes (with whatever permeability varying with the type of plastic used). Using some kind of thin glass vessel for solution storage might help but might also raise the cost.
The fact that FDA has allowed the earliest kits to "expire" should be a clue. This wouldn't preclude adjustments to the solution and/or even the strips to confirm no significant reduction in the reaction (where since these are qualitative and not quantitative, they don't have to be precise - just able to detect viral fragments and get enough of a reaction to cause a color change on the test strip).
This mentions some of the typical components of the reagent - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786400/
(retired ACS-certified chemist here
)
ProfessorGAC
(75,833 posts)That's been true since the 80s.
Some liquids don't play well with plastic, so glass still has to be used. But, you had to have seen tons of lab chemicals in plastic.
Same here. PhD, physical organic chemistry, 1981. Was ACS from 1976 until I retired.
The FDA letting the early ones expire is not a clue to me of anything other than a CYA maneuver.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)but not all. I know we had some that stayed in a hood and others in a walk-in fridge, and still others in a "bomb-proof" storage room in the basement of our building (e.g., stuff like ether, which was kept in metal cans). Also had chained gas tanks down near the loading dock in a special caged area.
These are supposed to be "cheap" (in a relative sense) consumer test kits that are not even expected to be disposed of as "hazardous" or "medical waste", so with the caveat of businesses thinking "planned obsolescence" = more $$$, I don't think they put that much thought in long-term storage.
And no, this is not a "CYA" maneuver by FDA. It's based on the fact that if a firm supplies data that shows that their test kits are still viable and continue to provide a similar range of detectability beyond the original expected period of time, then the agency will accept and announce the extension. Otherwise they will allow the tests to "expire" upon the date on the package. It's as simple as that.
ProfessorGAC
(75,833 posts)I honestly don't believe the expiration dates were based on anything scientific.
Now, it requires data to rescind a made-up date.
You think otherwise.
That's OK. Civil disagreement is the stuff of good discussion.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)It's been done for decades - notably for DOD - and has been deployed for the government stockpiles of medicines, etc. - https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/expiration-dating-extension
I know people think federal employees are like sloths from the movie "Zootopia" but I can tell you that this is not the case having been there done that for over 30 years.

ProfessorGAC
(75,833 posts)You can stop the lecture. You're obviously not listening to me. No reason I should continue.
To be abundantly clear; I do not believe the FDA followed any established protocol in setting expiration dates.
I'm out.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)and the analyses I have done, so the lectures are necessary.
There are protocols that have deployed for medical device test kits by CDRH, in consultation with CBER and CDER as necessary, and these have been in place for many many years. "Shelf-life extension" testing is "a thing", and making assumptions like you have is disingenuous.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)from detecting this - https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2023/08/25/1195592942/coronavirus-faqs-how-worrisome-is-the-new-variant-how-long-do-boosters-last
August 25, 2023 5:17 PM ET
By
Fran Kritz
(snip)
There's not yet enough data to assess the potential of this variant to cause a wave. But the CDC said on Wednesday that, "based on what [it] knows now, existing tests used to detect and medications used to treat COVID-19 appear to be effective" for the variant.
The CDC also believes that BA.2.86 may be more capable of causing infection in people who have previously had COVID-19 or who have received COVID-19 vaccines because the mutations on the spike protein could allow it to evade our immune systems despite prior vaccinations and having had COVID-19. Scientists are evaluating the effectiveness of the new booster expected to be approved by mid September.
And companies that make antigen tests, vaccines and treatments are testing them to see if they are effective on the variant.
(snip)
The kits (the "antigen" types are the most common for "at home" use) are usually designed to detect pieces of the virus. I expect the cases that have been found and reported so far may have been thanks to people with symptoms obtaining a positive rapid test, and then going in for a PCR to confirm (and eventually being lucky enough to have their sample sequenced at that point).
BComplex
(9,745 posts)Bad news is that if you've been vaccinated, you might be more vulnerable to this new variant.
It just keeps getting weirder with this virus.
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)And I think they are going to have to confirm that either way. Now that they have the genomic analysis of this latest, they could randomly go back to any samples taken from around the time this variant was reported overseas, to see if patients' samples here matched. They only rarely do sequencing on samples as it is time-consuming but they probably will spend some time to look for it - particularly since they have apparently found it in some of the waste-water samples at locations that test for COVID. Meanwhile, the manufacturers of the test will be confirming either way as well as it would be "good for marketing".
I would also note that given the annual flu shot is often hit or miss too, it is sort of par for the course with vaccines, although for this virus, the better they can target, the better to be able to reduce the damage the virus can do.
cstanleytech
(28,203 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)Medical info from actual research instead of whatever TFG divined on any given day.
LetMyPeopleVote
(174,739 posts)If OP is correct, this may not be that big of a deal
Link to tweet
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/trending/article/fourth-new-covid-variant-case-found-in-houston-18340782.php
Three other states and seven countries, including Denmark and Israel, have detected the variant.
Dr. Scott Wesley Long at the Houston Methodist Hospital posted on social media Thursday that the hospital identified the new variant, BA.2.86., through the "continuing comprehensive COVID-19 genome sequencing effort." According to Long, the BA.2.86 variant was detected after the hospital received a positive sample from a patient who was symptomatic.
Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)FDA's VRBPAC had voted for which variants to include back in June - https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/updated-covid-19-vaccines-use-united-states-beginning-fall-2023
Their next meeting isn't until Oct. 5 to select the flu strains for that vaccine so am not sure if they have to tack this on to that or what they did back in June is "enough" and CDC would just need to sign off (their ACIP has a meeting scheduled for Sept. 12 but not sure of the agenda).
Shanti Shanti Shanti
(12,047 posts)Just the booster, no idea who is eligible
BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)I think they are basing it on when CDC has its next ACIP meeting which is Sept. 12. I expect the eligibilty might be what gets decided next week and once voted for and signed off on by CDC and FDA, then it would be released.
There is a new CDC head so am not sure how fast she might review (Wallensky used to pretty much rubberstamp it to move it quickly), but I don't expect any boat-rocking with something like this.
electric_blue68
(25,775 posts)BumRushDaShow
(165,567 posts)which is why a century later, we weren't going to make the same mistake twice!!