Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(130,771 posts)
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 05:14 AM Mar 30

Texas federal judge blocks updated fair lending rules

Source: Reuters

March 29, 2024 10:54 PM EDT


March 29 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Texas on Friday blocked enforcement of new regulations adopted during the Biden administration that sought to overhaul how lenders extend loans and other services to low- and moderate-income Americans.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, sided with banking and business groups including the American Bankers Association and U.S. Chamber of Commerce in finding the new rules ran afoul of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

The judge, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, issued a preliminary injunction blocking their enforcement before they could take effect Monday. The agencies and trade groups did not respond to requests for comment.

The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency last year updated their rules enforcing the 1977 fair lending law, which seeks to ensure banks lend in their local communities. Conceived to prevent red lining - a discriminatory practice where banks refuse or offer only limited lending to certain areas or populations, primarily minorities - CRA regulations gauge how well banks service areas where they operate.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/texas-federal-judge-blocks-updated-fair-lending-rules-2024-03-30/



More judge-shopped mess.
14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

OldBaldy1701E

(5,254 posts)
3. One has to wonder what stake that judge has in this.
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 07:23 AM
Mar 30

Because the idea that anyone should side with those who prefer to discriminate against those who are not rich enough to protect themselves from predator businesses just sounds like a conflict of interest to myself. But what do I know?

TxGuitar

(4,239 posts)
6. He is a disgrace
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 08:57 AM
Mar 30

Republicans like to file in his court. Mifepristone case was filed in his court. He is a total shit stain. Appointed by Trump, took 3 times I think to get his appointment confirmed.

charliea

(260 posts)
10. These decisions...
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 01:31 PM
Mar 30

Will get him a supreme court appointment is Trump is elected, since Project 2025 would see him becoming president for life...

Martin68

(23,149 posts)
7. I was tempted to call this Texas judge a Neanderthal, but the latest research on Neanderthals indicates they
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 11:44 AM
Mar 30

were for more intelligent and civilized than this.

Zilli

(199 posts)
8. This is "the way of things".
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 11:52 AM
Mar 30

Texas will not tolerate, even for one minute, fair lending rules......................................

ananda

(28,953 posts)
11. I wonder how rightwing judges like that ever pass the bar.
Sat Mar 30, 2024, 01:43 PM
Mar 30

They sure don't follow the law, the constitution, or human decency.

And that includes the awful SCOTUS justices too.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Texas federal judge block...