Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

autorank

(29,481 posts)
Sat May 4, 2024, 12:21 AM May 2024

'It's significant': Law professor says key Trump defense can be blown up with one question

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Emile (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: RAWSTORY

5/3/24 11:27PM.

"Donald Trump's key defense in his hush money cover-up case could be dismantled if the New York prosecutors decide to ask Michael Cohen about one thing, a law professor said on Friday."



Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-one-question-significant-cohen/



It's a PERRY MASON moment!
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'It's significant': Law professor says key Trump defense can be blown up with one question (Original Post) autorank May 2024 OP
Does anyone really question whether trump paid the $130,000? Think issue is can DA show Silent Type May 2024 #1
It's easy. Cohen would have had to declare the $130,000 on his federal tax return no_hypocrisy May 2024 #2
Cohen reportedly *DID* pay taxes on it, reporting it as income and not reimbursement. thesquanderer May 2024 #3
Thank you as I didn't know that at all. no_hypocrisy May 2024 #4
After an alert and discussion with the hosts locking. Emile May 2024 #5
 

Silent Type

(12,412 posts)
1. Does anyone really question whether trump paid the $130,000? Think issue is can DA show
Sat May 4, 2024, 12:56 AM
May 2024

he did it in furtherance of the crime of election interference (and jury buys into that). I’m sure he did, but I wouldn’t have made it through jury selection.

no_hypocrisy

(54,178 posts)
2. It's easy. Cohen would have had to declare the $130,000 on his federal tax return
Sat May 4, 2024, 05:57 AM
May 2024

as reimbursement of a debt, in order not to pay taxes on that amount as "Income."

He could submit his 2016 Return as documentary support of his contention that he was paid back by Trump.

And the next question would be, "Why would you lend that amount of money to a Billionaire in the first place?"

thesquanderer

(12,899 posts)
3. Cohen reportedly *DID* pay taxes on it, reporting it as income and not reimbursement.
Sat May 4, 2024, 08:13 AM
May 2024

That's why Trump actually gave him far more than $130k, so he'd be able to report it as income and not reimbursement but still end up getting back the full $130k net after taxes.

no_hypocrisy

(54,178 posts)
4. Thank you as I didn't know that at all.
Sat May 4, 2024, 08:41 AM
May 2024

Emile

(40,450 posts)
5. After an alert and discussion with the hosts locking.
Sat May 4, 2024, 09:38 AM
May 2024

No opinion pieces allowed in Latest Breaking News.

Feel free to repost it in General Discussion.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'It's significant': Law p...