Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(58,281 posts)
Thu May 23, 2024, 07:18 PM May 23

Long before Key Bridge collapse, Baltimore mariners warned of 'ship strikes'

Source: Washington Post

WP EXCLUSIVE
Long before Key Bridge collapse, Baltimore mariners warned of ‘ship strikes’

Members of a Baltimore harbor safety committee repeatedly raised the possibility that an out-of-control vessel could imperil the bridge, records show

By Steve Thompson and Ian Duncan
Updated May 23, 2024 at 10:45 a.m. EDT | Published May 23, 2024 at 8:02 a.m. EDT



The remains of the Francis Scott Key Bridge on March 26, 2024, in Baltimore. Six construction workers were killed and Baltimore’s port was crippled when the 985-foot-long cargo ship Dali hit the bridge, bringing it down in seconds. (Michael A. McCoy for The Washington Post)

The warnings came, sometimes in eerily specific terms, years before a giant cargo ship struck Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge: A ship could lose power “in close vicinity to a bridge,” an out-of-control vessel could cause “a bridge collapse,” and the Key Bridge was “not designed to withstand collisions from large vessels.”

After the strike caused the bridge’s collapse in March, horrified officials described the catastrophe as one that couldn’t have been anticipated. But a maritime safety committee, including experts from key government agencies, repeatedly raised the possibility of such a disaster over the past two decades, according to previously unreported records obtained by The Washington Post. For nearly 10 of those years, as ever-larger cargo ships visited Baltimore’s port, the committee included “Recommendations for bridge protection from ship strikes” on a list of its action items. In 2016, that action item stopped appearing in meeting minutes without explanation.

The group, known as the Baltimore Harbor Safety and Coordination Committee, discussed the Key and Chesapeake Bay bridges, among others. Maryland pilots — specialists who board large vessels and then guide them safely in and out of port — in particular sounded alarm about local bridges needing more protection from errant ships, the records show.

{snip}

Alice Crites contributed to this report.

By Steve Thompson
Steve Thompson writes about government and politics in Maryland, D.C. and Virginia. Before joining The Washington Post in 2018, he was an investigative reporter for the Dallas Morning News. He started in journalism as a police reporter at the St. Petersburg Times. Twitter

By Ian Duncan
Ian Duncan is a reporter covering federal transportation agencies and the politics of transportation. He previously worked at the Baltimore Sun for seven years, covering city hall, the military and criminal justice. He was part of the Sun's team covering Freddie Gray's death in 2015 and then-Mayor Catherine Pugh's Healthy Holly books scandal. Twitter

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2024/05/23/key-bridge-warnings-ship-strikes/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Old Crank

(3,848 posts)
8. In some cases this is done.
Fri May 24, 2024, 03:40 AM
May 24

Panama had to widden the canal system to hold bgger ships. Panamax is a standard, adn ships which don't travel through the canal can be much larger.

chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.aapa-ports.org/files/Panamax%20vs%20Post-Panamax%20comparison%20article.pdf

It is more efficient to operate a larger ship. The added cargo weight doesn't affect the efficiency of the ship that much, almost like trains. You can use the same numbers of crew on a ship that is twice as large. Unloading one large ship is faster than two smaller ships.

Now there are docking issues at ports and draft issues for channels many of these will limit ship size.

summer_in_TX

(2,805 posts)
6. Larry Hogan ignored repeated warnings about the danger of ships striking the bridge.
Fri May 24, 2024, 12:39 AM
May 24
https://www.levernews.com/hogan-pressed-for-bigger-ships-despite-safety-warnings/

Hogan Pressed For Bigger Ships, Despite Safety Warnings

Days after a massive cargo ship collided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Republican U.S. Senate candidate Larry Hogan called for the federal government to foot the bill for the bridge’s reconstruction. Hogan’s demand follows his efforts as Maryland’s governor to attract such outsized cargo vessels to Baltimore’s port in the first place — despite safety warnings from an insurance giant and transportation experts.

Regardless of those concerns, Hogan’s gubernatorial administration pledged that bringing ever-larger cargo ships to Baltimore would strengthen the economy — and even improve safety.

3Hotdogs

(12,672 posts)
9. Thing is --- the weight of the ship had no bearing on the cause. Power can go out on a ship of any size.
Fri May 24, 2024, 07:55 AM
May 24

What changes in bridge design can lessen the chance of a repeat of such a disaster?

maxrandb

(15,552 posts)
10. 2016 strikes again? Wonder if this was more deregulation reichwing claptrap
Fri May 24, 2024, 08:24 AM
May 24

Somebody get Elaine Chao on the phone.

"For nearly 10 of those years, as ever-larger cargo ships visited Baltimore’s port, the committee included “Recommendations for bridge protection from ship strikes” on a list of its action items. In 2016, that action item stopped appearing in meeting minutes without explanation.

I believe that this, and other such collisions, could be prevented by requiring additional tugs alongside until ships clear major infrastructure.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Long before Key Bridge co...