Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(131,773 posts)
Fri May 24, 2024, 08:53 PM May 24

Prosecutors Seek To Bar Trump In Classified Files Case From Statements Endangering Law Enforcement

Last edited Fri May 24, 2024, 09:43 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Huff Post/AP

May 24, 2024, 08:45 PM EDT | Updated 6 minutes ago




WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors on Friday asked the judge overseeing the classified documents case against Donald Trump to bar the former president from public statements that “pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents” participating in the prosecution. The request to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon follows a false claim by Trump earlier this week that the FBI agents who searched his Mar-a-Lago estate in August 2022 were “authorized to shoot me” and were “locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger.”

The presumptive Republican presidential nominee was referring to the disclosure in a court document that the FBI, during the search, followed a standard use-of-force policy that prohibits the use of deadly force except when the officer conducting the search has a reasonable belief that the “subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.”

The policy is routine and meant to limit the use of force during searches. Prosecutors noted that the search was intentionally conducted when Trump and his family were away and was coordinated with the Secret Service. No force was used. Prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team said in court papers late Friday that Trump’s statements falsely suggesting that federal agents “were complicit in a plot to assassinate him” expose law enforcement — some of whom prosecutors noted will be called as witnesses at his trial — “to the risk of threats, violence, and harassment.”

“Trump’s repeated mischaracterization of these facts in widely distributed messages as an attempt to kill him, his family, and Secret Service agents has endangered law enforcement officers involved in the investigation and prosecution of this case and threatened the integrity of these proceedings,” prosecutors told Cannon, who was nominated to the bench by Trump. “A restriction prohibiting future similar statements does not restrict legitimate speech,” they said.

Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-classified-documents-law-enforcement_n_66513418e4b0bc91bbed10da



Article updated.

Original article -

May 24, 2024, 08:45 PM EDT


WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors on Friday asked the judge overseeing the classified documents case against Donald Trump to bar the former president from public statements that “pose a significant, imminent, and foreseeable danger to law enforcement agents” participating in the prosecution.

The request to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon follows a false claim by Trump earlier this week that the FBI agents who searched his home in August 2022 were “authorized to shoot me” and were “locked & loaded ready to take me out & put my family in danger.”

He was referring to the disclosure in a court document that was made public that the FBI, during the search, followed a standard use-of-force policy that prohibits the use of deadly force except when the officer conducting the search has a reasonable belief that the “subject of such force poses an imminent danger of death or serious physical injury to the officer or to another person.” The policy is routine and meant to limit the use of force during searches. Prosecutors noted that the search was intentionally conducted when Trump and his family were away and was coordinated with the Secret Service. No force was used.

“The Government’s request is necessary because of several intentionally false and inflammatory statements recently made by Trump that distort the circumstances under which the Federal Bureau of Investigation planned and executed the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago,” prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team wrote in asking that Cannon make a restriction on Trump’s statements a condition of his release pending trial.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prosecutors Seek To Bar Trump In Classified Files Case From Statements Endangering Law Enforcement (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 24 OP
And the puppet judge say, trump wouldn't do any thing like endangering an LE. republianmushroom May 24 #1
It's funny because MutantAndProud May 24 #2
K&R Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 25 #3
 

MutantAndProud

(855 posts)
2. It's funny because
Fri May 24, 2024, 09:13 PM
May 24

When I tried reporting the originator of the January 6 plan, law enforcement in my state did the same thing to protect the guy who was also a major perpetrator of other crimes (not law enforcement himself, just friends with them, and a financial donor to them).

Just to reference the other threads earlier in the week asking if anyone knew who the person or persons were who started it, where they were, and what they are doing now. The answer being yes, a handful of people in and out of the government absolutely know all of the above. As do at least some DU commenters and/or trolls who have commented on my past threads asking for input/assistance leading me to question this iteration of DU and some of the progressives. But no, doxing is not on the table (not that it ever was despite the sabotage by a conservative now-ex-clerk of court who promised to help figure out filing reports and charges for past crimes which were linked to the early-2017 origin of January 6 *and* October 7, before fabricating evidence possibly with said law enforcement employees [not assumed to be federal, appears to be local corruption in this instance, to be clear] and perpetrator to sabotage the efforts {ongoing since early 2022} to get justice and bring visibility to it all). The judiciary saw through it very quickly.

Oh and Donald absolutely deserves it if they can do it to whistleblowers and victims, and I’m quite sure he knows why he doesn’t deserve to be free of those constraints.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Prosecutors Seek To Bar T...