Justice Neil Gorsuch: Americans are 'getting whacked' by too many laws
Source: The Guardian
US supreme court justice Neil Gorsuch has said ordinary Americans are getting whacked by too many laws and regulations in a new book that underscores his skepticism of federal agencies and the power they wield.
Too little law and were not safe, and our liberties arent protected, Gorsuch told the Associated Press in an interview in his supreme court office. But too much law and you actually impair those same things.
Over Ruled: The Human Toll of Too Much Law is being published Tuesday by Harper, an imprint of HarperCollins Publishers. Gorsuch has received a $500,000 advance for the book, according to his annual financial disclosure reports.
In the interview, Gorsuch refused to be drawn into discussions about term limits or an enforceable code of ethics for the justices, both recently proposed by Joe Biden at a time of diminished public trust in the court.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/04/supreme-court-justice-neil-gorsuch
I think he was using the royal "We" and talking about his RW partners on the Court.
SWBTATTReg
(23,461 posts)papers a day, and that's it. As to the law and all that's going on...I say that the legislators and elected officials on the front lines, as well as the attorneys working the front lines too, know far more than you POS.
And by the way, with the way you all whacked Roe, said that it was, after being the law of the land for so long, invalid, you caused each and every territory in the US to have to examine the laws on their books, perhaps write and enact more laws, from 1 thing you did.
Happy? Scumbag. Can't admit any responsibility for the mess you all made.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,125 posts)It's not his job to create an arbitrary limit to the number of laws. He is part of the Subversive Six intent on subverting the rule of law to fit their extreme ideology.
plimsoll
(1,690 posts)eom
Lasher
(28,055 posts)We don't see that particular label bantered about any more, do we?
travelingthrulife
(248 posts)So Gorsuch wants more latitude to crime in peace.
bluestarone
(17,825 posts)Does he think he's getting promoted?
unblock
(53,794 posts)In theory, sure, a country could over-regulate.
But there's no compelling evidence to support that that's going on in America. If anything, our regulations are too lax.
Midnight Writer
(22,584 posts)Gorsuch goes all in.
I reckon it doesn't cross his mind that laws controlling the lives of women count as "too much law".
Autumn
(45,729 posts)should shut the fuck up with his whining. Fuck him and his United States judiciary
Blue Dotty
(47 posts)Blue Owl
(53,529 posts)wolfie001
(3,004 posts)Corporate trough-feeding oinker. Also, letting the Orange Obese Oaf do whatever the f6ck he wants.
BaronChocula
(2,075 posts)I don't think he's talking about dumping motor oil down the storm drain because I don't see him as being that domestically adept. So he must be complaining about those pesky laws requiring privileged appointees to report of gifts. Or maybe he's still sore about Mommy being the first U.S. agency head to be held in contempt of Congress. Fuckin' baby.
Blues Heron
(6,073 posts)I wonder if he thinks the weight of law should be measured in kilograms
CousinIT
(9,695 posts)Karma13612
(4,631 posts)I noticed many posts were about the SCOTUS not liking laws about themselves. I can see how Neil would be chaffing at laws that affect them.
But, he really cant see that their decisions are creating hundreds of laws restricting womens reproductive rights.
They are souless monsters.
S/V Loner
(9,072 posts)fix them by calling them gratuities only the SC decides which is which. We know how that will work Asshole.
Hieronymus Phact
(466 posts)He needed to relieve one person of the burden of following any laws.
Marcuse
(7,835 posts)Bozvotros
(819 posts)We always knew you could train seals to bark on command.
Evolve Dammit
(17,852 posts)Evolve Dammit
(17,852 posts)Dem2theMax
(10,021 posts)Americans are getting whacked by corrupt Supreme Court Justices.
Karma13612
(4,631 posts)Laws against women getting needed OB GYN care?
You walked right into that one, Neil!
Flippin fascist fckhead SOB
NYC Liberal
(20,320 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_Gorsuch_Burford
erronis
(16,344 posts)andym
(5,553 posts)From the same Wikipedia article
Superfund
In 1982, Congress charged that the EPA had mishandled the $1.6 billion toxic waste Superfund by taking certain inappropriate and potentially illegal actions including withholding disbursements in order to affect a California political campaign. When Congress demanded records from Gorsuch, she refused and as a result became the first agency director in U.S. history to be cited for contempt of Congress.[8][9]
Hugh Kaufman, an EPA employee, leaked documents to Congress.[10][11]
The stand-off ended in late February 1983, when Richard Hauser, the White House deputy counsel, confirmed one or more Reagan Administration officials had in fact reported to the White House that they had heard Gorsuch say at an August 4, 1982, luncheon that she was holding back more than $6 million in Federal funds to clean up the Stringfellow Acid Pits toxic waste site near Los Angeles to avoid helping the Senate campaign of former Gov. Jerry Brown of California, a Democrat.[12]
The White House then abandoned its court claim that the documents related to this incident could not be subpoenaed by Congress because they were covered by executive privilege and the EPA turned the documents over to Congress. Gorsuch immediately resigned her post effective March 3, 1983, citing pressures caused by the media and the congressional investigation.
dameatball
(7,525 posts)jvill
(308 posts)...
the American people are being whacked by right wing Supreme Court judges!
Talitha
(7,223 posts)Mz Pip
(27,653 posts)But we disagree on what laws.
Hes fine on all the laws that are being made to control women. I am not.
niyad
(117,672 posts)books, and in the works, restricting women from full autonomy.
FUCK YOU, YOU LYING, HYPOCRITICAL, MISOGYNISTIC WASTE OF OXYGEN.
Scrivener7
(52,026 posts)Martin68
(23,961 posts)Why would a judge complain about "too many laws?" Their job is to rule on the applicability of law to a particular case, or the constitutionality of a law. Their job does not include judgment on the number of laws. Gorsuch is a prefect example of why we need to remind SCOTUS of what their job is, what their job is not, and what constituter a breach of ethics.
PortTack
(33,899 posts)Baitball Blogger
(47,413 posts)If he thinks that it's his job to kill the bills that Congress passes, I would have to say I found the flaw in the process.
NNadir
(34,017 posts)AZ8theist
(6,055 posts)Our (the Supreme Court) billionaire owners don't like regs stopping us from shitting on everyone and everything while making gobs of money.
Tweedy
(840 posts)Baksheesh . I mean gratuities
bhikkhu
(10,748 posts)When we see people in power obviously and carelessly breaking the law and then nothing happens - that causes real problems.
Tweedy
(840 posts)Or the law when deciding the presidential immunity case.
He has lost any right to the benefit of the doubt.
He is another weird one. Still carrying a grudge that Congress tried to make his mother as EPA director actually follow the law that President Nixon proposed. Oh! The horror! Who wears a chip on their shoulder forever when their forbear was in the wrong? Why, a modern day MAGA follower that is who.
We should all thank Joe Biden for keeping this weird controlling creeps back for a bit. Imagine how bad it would be now if Mr. Bork, the weirdos weirdo, had gotten on our court back in the 80s!
calimary
(83,370 posts)You interested, Mr. Associate Justice? Let's not have ANY laws then, right? Which would immediately make me wonder why we even need YOU around, then. And that also goes for your Republican friends and associates who never want to be held to any rules, never saw a rule they didn't want to break, never saw a guardrail they didn't want to weasel around, never saw a goal they weren't at least tempted to try to cheat to win.
Gee, as you can probably guess, I hold these folks, AND especially guys like Gorsuch, in the absolute first-class bar-none utmost of "esteem."
bmichaelh
(525 posts)Envy of the world? Not quite
The only reason you are on the Supreme Court is because US has a system that no other country has ... Electoral College.
Trump did not beat Clinton in the popular vote.
No other country is amending their constitution to enact Electoral Colleges or Judges with lifetime tenure.
Grins
(7,658 posts)Thanks, Leo!!
What Reich-wing publisher is going to do the dirty
?
Skittles
(156,746 posts)he shouldn't even BE THERE, Dems were ROBBED
BlueWavePsych
(2,864 posts)bucolic_frolic
(45,616 posts)It's all about deregulation, plundering the environment for Republican profit. Like his mom.
Kid Berwyn
(16,985 posts)Neil Gorsuch: Go to Hell.
Bengus81
(7,255 posts)Let the Koch pollute all they want,drop those fuel standards on cars,get rid of the EPA,OSHA,minimum wage, all labor laws etc....
But no...we need laws that have kept people caught with some weed and other petty shit behind bars for years and years. Keeps em off those voting rolls.
justice yoursuchadick is whacked.
MayReasonRule
(1,541 posts)Here's to Kamala's election as POTUS!
Here's to flushing the fascist turds out of the system and out of our nation!
Here's to reason's rule!
Kahuna
(27,314 posts)ck4829
(35,521 posts)Mysterian
(4,995 posts)Every word that comes out of his filthy mouth is lies and trash.
BigDemVoter
(4,431 posts)Mysterian
(4,995 posts)but thanks for chiming in, Mr. Helper!
republianmushroom
(16,309 posts)it is Sh*t like this that is whacking the people... it is the unethical and crooked Supreme Court,
"Justice Clarence Thomas failed to publicly disclose additional private travel provided by the wealthy conservative donor Harlan Crow, a top Democratic senator said in a letter on Monday.
Customs and Border Protection records revealed that the justice and his wife, Virginia Thomas, took a round trip between Hawaii and New Zealand in November 2010 on Mr. Crows private jet, according to the letter. Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, writing to Mr. Crows lawyer, demanded that he supply more information about the financial relationship between the two men."...
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/05/us/politics/clarence-thomas-harlan-crow-private-jet.html
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219287736
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(112,345 posts)orthoclad
(4,044 posts)wonder where he picked it up
Mysterian
(4,995 posts)What we really need is a corrupt, unelected panel of "justices" simply RULING BY DECREE! Isn't that right, Neil?
Mysterian
(4,995 posts)are crooked cretins like Gorsuch when there's talk of making the rules apply to HIM.
Carlitos Brigante
(26,691 posts)inconsistent and unethical these assholes are. They're not judges. They're politicians.