Robert Bork Dead: Former Solicitor General And Supreme Court Nominee Dies At 84
Source: Huffington Post
Robert Bork, a former solicitor general perhaps best known for his controversial Supreme Court nomination which failed in 1987, died Wednesday due to heart complications, PJ Media and National Review report. He was 84.
Bork was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Ronald Reagan in 1987, only to be eventually rejected by the Senate after contentious debate.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/19/robert-bork-dead-dies_n_2329553.html
hlthe2b
(102,289 posts)If you can't say anything nice, say nothing at all...
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
crickets....
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)SharonAnn
(13,776 posts)I'm concerned that I feel this way, but the end of some of these people can't come soon enough for me. They do terrible damage to our democracy.
lastlib
(23,243 posts)Thank you, God and Ted Kennedy, for never allowing this slimewad to sit on the Supreme Court of the United States.
(no, I didn't say anything bad about him; calling him a slimewad is like giving him a field promotion from what I really think of him. Now, slimewads might be justifiably offended.........)
Randomthought
(835 posts)Thanks to Joe too
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Nino the Fixer Scalia is another.
Bucky
(54,020 posts)Adenoid_Hynkel
(14,093 posts)The nasty stuff shall remain in my thought bubble
goclark
(30,404 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Thank-you Mr. Clemens, I do believe I resemble that remark.
madaboutharry
(40,212 posts)Paladin
(28,264 posts)prairierose
(2,145 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Sorry, but I am just not sorry.
...
DinahMoeHum
(21,794 posts)- seen on graffiti all those years ago.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)That's about the nicest thing I can say about him.
(Stole that from the old Night Court show)
I agree!
progressoid
(49,991 posts)Are you sure?
alfredo
(60,074 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)alfredo
(60,074 posts)DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)Once again, a bad comparison, and I have to apologize to the slime molds. I really do like slime molds - they are much more beautiful than Bork.
Botany
(70,516 posts)Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Botany
(70,516 posts)Scruffy beard and nasty ideology ..... I am pretty sure that is Bork or his
doppelganger.
jsr
(7,712 posts)tech3149
(4,452 posts)Kolesar
(31,182 posts)swayne
(383 posts)the legacy has been lasting, but it seems to be going away. We'll see...
n2doc
(47,953 posts)Had he been appointed he would have easily been the equal of Scalia in asshattery. Don't blame his rejection for our problems, blame the Senate that didn't reject more of these fools.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)And given Scalia, Thomas and Alito on the court plus all the nominations the Republicans have held up in the Senate I see no reason to think hyperpartisanism is going anywhere.
Volaris
(10,272 posts)that will act as a pretty good blocking mechanism...but I'm not placing that bet YET.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)I left Roberts off the asshattery list because he can at least read a poll, as shown by his ruling on the ACA.
But I'm not holding my breath.
annabanana
(52,791 posts)Scalia is still alive. If Bork had been there he would have done no worse damage and then. . . . . . .
The vacant seat on the court to which Bork was nominated eventually went to Judge Anthony Kennedy who was unanimously approved by the Senate, 97-0
We would not have had Scalia in THAT seat.
Kennedy, not a great judge by any means, but 10x better than Scalia or Bork. The only thing that would have been good about having Bork there would be that we would now have an opening.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Reagan should never have appointed someone with so little chance of being confirmed. Reagan's action lead to the hyper partisan rancour over judges that has poisoned the system ever since. Another Reagan legacy, along with out of control budgets, and union bashing with which we suffer to this day. And the middle class has been in decline every since he was President.
caseymoz
(5,763 posts)Conservatives were hellbent on putting ideologues of questionable integrity and ethics. I still find the fact that Bork called himself a "constructionist" to be insulting to the intelligence.
Conservatives, especially social ones, resented Roe v. Wade and economic conservatives resented a whole slew of rulings. They were crying foul because the courts were "legislating from the bench." So, now they got their constructionists in to do the same damn thing.
Thomas hadn't entered the pipes yet. A fight over the courts was inevitable.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)The Republicans were working throughout the 70s and 80s to bring up a new crop of ultraconservative lawyers to fill judicial positions from the lowest bench to the Supreme Court.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Anyone who believes that we the people have no rights except those explicitly mentioned in the law should not be a judge.
JHB
(37,160 posts)...for their own crop of politically-active federal judges because they convinced themselves that the courts were a stronghold of liberal activism. It was the judicial parallel to their campaigns against "liberal media" which saw bias in every report that failed to promote the conservative view.
Bork was just the first of these to reach the Supreme Court, and if they didn't know "Mr. Saturday Night Massacre" would spark a fight then they were deluding themselves (more than usual). And Bork's writings since then pretty much support the view that Bork's attempts to look moderate at his hearings was just lip service.
The SC approvals have become hyper-partisan because conservatives organized themselves to make it so.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)calimary
(81,304 posts)Glad you're here. Many an attempt here to be graceful and not speak ill of the dead. So I'll go along with that.
WhoWoodaKnew
(847 posts)blueclown
(1,869 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)No toast for Nixon/Reagan stooges.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)CrazyOrangeCat
(6,112 posts)Not Louie Gohmert crazy, but quite a piece of work. Adios.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)ruled in favor of a corporation who gave women of childbearing age the choice, they could either be sterilized, or be fired! He supported segregation. His views were of the most vile and harmful sort, with no thought to justice. Like Scalia, he thought that there should be an elite, and corporations rule! But, as much as I despise Scalia, Bork would have been much worse. SCOTUS decisions can be life or death to many Americans. Would you want either of those two making those decisions for you? Scary stuff indeed!
CrazyOrangeCat
(6,112 posts)TroyD
(4,551 posts)It was reported earlier in the year that Bork was going to be Romney's chief adviser on legal issues.
Turns out that even if Romney had won, Bork wouldn't have been able to fulfill his duties.
Just as well!
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)In Oct 1973 when Nixon ordered AG Elliot Richardson to fire Archibald Cox over the Watergate tapes he refused and resigned instead. Then the deputy AG William Ruckleshaus also resigned rather than carry out the order. Next in line was Soliciter General Bork, who carried out the order - which was later ruled an illegal act in a lawsuit filed by Ralph Nader. So spare no tears for the failure of Bork to get confirmed for the SCOTUS. His enabling of Nixon to continue to flout the law let the Watergate saga drag on for another 9 months. Had Bork refused Nixon's order it may well have triggered a constitutional crisis which could have forced Nixon to resign much earlier.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)that incident is when the guy's name got filed in my "gov't criminal" mental folder.
Imagine my surprise when Reagan dusted him off and presented him for Congressional review.
REP
(21,691 posts)It was the '70s.
Response to brooklynite (Original post)
Post removed
Harry Monroe
(2,935 posts)As for Robert Bork....I would say let him rot in hell, but I don't want to speak ill of the dead. The nicest thing I can say is...Robert Bork, you won't be missed.
RC
(25,592 posts)kooljerk666
(776 posts)yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Kennedy's nomination came after the rejection of Bork and the withdrawal of Douglas Ginsberg, who was revealed to have smoked marijuana.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Nowadays, would anyone have batted an eye if a guy admitted to smoking weed?
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)I hope he just started roasting nicely.
I hope Fat Tony and Silent Clarence follows....
Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)I will not stoop to wishing ill of the dead. RIP and all my best to his family.
broadcaster75201
(387 posts)... then you know how I feel about this news.
alfredo
(60,074 posts)southernyankeebelle
(11,304 posts)Thank god.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)hope it's warm where he now resides
kpete
(71,996 posts)but, good riddance,
kp
Nanjing to Seoul
(2,088 posts)struggle4progress
(118,290 posts)In May 1973, AG Elliot Richardson appointed Archibald Cox as a special prosecutor to investigate the 1972 Watergate break-in. and Cox subpoenaed President Nixon for his Oval Office tapes. Nixon responded on Saturday, 20 October 1973, by ordering Richardson to fire Cox, but Richardson resigned instead. Nixon next gave that order to the next-highest official, William Ruckelshaus, who also chose to resign. This left Robert Bork effectively head of the Justice Department. Bork followed Nixon's instructions and fired Cox
This Saturday Night Massacre shocked most people and contributed to Nixon's fall. But it made Bork a great hero to conservative hardliners, who pushed Reagan to nominate Bork for the Supreme Court
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Richardson and Ruckelshouse both refused to, because it was grossly unethical. Bork didn't have any ethics, so he became the hatchetman. THAT act is what truly scuttled his SCOTUS nom.
Response to struggle4progress (Reply #40)
Arugula Latte This message was self-deleted by its author.
Beacool
(30,249 posts)My condolences to his family.
PlanetBev
(4,104 posts)Mean, heartless bastard. Say "hi" to Breitbart for me.
JohnnyRingo
(18,636 posts)Hahahaha
I agree, but karma has me keeping the celebration relatively quiet.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)alp227
(32,027 posts)Robert Borks America is a land in which women would be forced into back alley abortions, blacks would sit at segregated lunch counters, school children could not be taught about evolution, writers and artists could be censured at the whim of government."
FVZA_Colonel
(4,096 posts)ignoring his involvement in the Saturday Night Massacre and his support for poll taxes.
We're better off without him.
amuse bouche
(3,657 posts)article about him
"Robert Bork Was a Terrible Human Being and No One Should Grieve His Passing"
"Robert Bork has died. Bork is best known in public memory for his failed Supreme Court nomination, which thankfully foundered on the rank extremism of his beliefs. And those beliefs were vilenot because of the stark principles that purportedly undergirded them, but because of the bigotry and contempt for modernity they masked.
But more vile than his reactionary agenda was his hatred for democracy and his fealty to incipient tyranny, as expressed in his willingness to follow anti-Semitic madman Richard Nixon down the rabbit hole of criminality"
http://gawker.com/5969771/robert-bork-was-a-terrible-human-being-and-no-one-should-grieve-his-passing
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)Speck Tater
(10,618 posts)... he was shocked to come face to face with God and find out She's a Liberal!
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)jmowreader
(50,559 posts)So I don't believe Bork's is roasting in a nonexistent hell.
I believe what you leave behind is your reputation. Bork's is of the most corrupt man in America. This guy makes Gee Dubya Bush look honest.
yorgatron
(2,289 posts)Odin2005
(53,521 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)Imagine if he had been there to tell Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia to lay off the steak lunches and do some actual work instead.
By now, they surely would have realized their dreams, and America would be overpopulated, impoverished, and in the middle of a decades-long civil war as the various factions of religious extremism used unlimited weaponry against one another in a bid for control of the nation.
Un-maintained planes would be colliding and falling from the sky while poor people chip away at the concrete foundations of bridges to get at the rebar for recycling. There would be few trees left as they would need to be cleared to create lines of sight for the mounted machine gun positions that protect every wealthy person's home. Crack would be freely distributed in non-white neighborhoods.
My lovely mountains would have turned blue again as the cordite smoke from incessant combat hung in the air. Where has the dream gone?
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)Which old Bork? Robert Bork.
From NBC:
<snip>
Playing a leading role is defeating Bork was the then-chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, an episode Biden recalled in his debate with GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin in 2008: I led the fight against Judge Bork. Had he been on the court, I suspect there would be a lot of changes that I don't like and the American people wouldn't like, including everything from (overturning) Roe v. Wade to issues relating to civil rights and civil liberties.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)He is no more.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)ellisonz
(27,711 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)upon this country via the Supreme Court for the past 25 years!
cloudbase
(5,520 posts)never in doubt.
The one man who could make Scalia almost look mainstream.
dairydog91
(951 posts)Chief among them would be Scalia's generally good outlook on free speech cases. Bork's Slouching towards Gomorrah had more than a few pages in which he railed about the horrors of flag burning, wearing anti-draft jackets, and other horrible acts which he thought didn't deserve any First Amendment protections.
BlueManFan
(256 posts)isn't the same thing as actually killing him so my conscience is clear. He can join Lee Atwater in hell's armpit.
Great Caesars Ghost
(532 posts)triplepoint
(431 posts)I had a bumpersticker on my car while at Purdue during the time bork was nominated for the U.S. Supreme Court. It said:
I'm Pro-aBORKtion!
I parked the car in a supermarket parking lot and went inside the store. When I came back out, the passenger window had chewing tobacco splattered all over it. It made my day.
It's nice to wake up and read this great news. Truly made my day!
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)trying to close down the watergate investigation rather than his nomination to the Supreme Court.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)that her mother taught her to say nothing but good about the dead. He's dead. Good.
Turbineguy
(37,338 posts)he'll miss the end of the world on friday.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)even though he never said it:
"All men have an emotion to kill; when they strongly dislike some one they involuntarily wish he was dead. I have never killed any one, but I have read some obituary notices with great satisfaction."
Source: http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2011/05/mark-twain-didnt-say-thing-about-obituaries/37279/
aquart
(69,014 posts)Oh dear God, is he Number 2? I don't want him on the same list as Daniel Inouye.
Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)if he'd just nominated him for the vacancy in '86, when he still had a GOP Senate. Why was the Gipper so bound and determined to make OUR guys confirm the bastard?
question everything
(47,486 posts)asking my two senators and two primary candidates who were on the judiciary committee: Biden (not sure whether he was still in the running) and Simon to reject his nomination.
Warpy
(111,270 posts)but I have read some obituaries with great pleasure."--Clarence Darrow
It should be his epitaph.
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)williesgirl
(4,033 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,172 posts)...Balam confirmed that Mr. Bork has been received and is resting comfortably, naked, while being violated in every orifice of his body.
Fedaykin
(118 posts)or becomes the dust
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)Except a thank you to the late Senator Kennedy and to Biden who both played big roles in keeping Bork off the SC. And Biden did not do it by attacking him in an ultra political way, which many Repubs now lie about. He used the argument about the right to privacy. And Bork did himself in all on his own.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)I wish he had been elected to the SC. Then Obama could put in a Dem which is the only way we'll ever have a majority is if a rethug SCJ retires or dies.
DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)But considering what this creep could have done, and tried to keep doing...
YES..
TIME TO GRAVE DANCE!!!
kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)Because I'm not.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)But when Scalia dies, it will be a different story.
JohnnyRingo
(18,636 posts)But now we know it won't get worse.
May he rest in peace or something, I don't care.
Tutonic
(2,522 posts)MrSlayer
(22,143 posts)He just wasn't. Bork was a bad guy that did bad things. No tears from me.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)me, too. But it may not be legal to bury toxic waste. He may have to be cremated. We wouldn't want him leaching into the groundwater-table.....
XanaDUer
(12,939 posts)AngryOldDem
(14,061 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)I am so not mourning this guy.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts).
and-justice-for-all
(14,765 posts)JPK
(651 posts)YEA! Someone should have told him to do a better job of shaving. He always looked like a derelict.
bobhuntsman
(118 posts)Cheney next???
amen.