Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Chef Eric

(1,024 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:38 PM Dec 2012

"Fix the Debt"- Defense Contractor Ties Exposed

Source: Washington Monthly

By Samuel Knight

Nothing exposes GOP flailing about debt for the fraud that it is like defense budget scrutiny. When genuine deficit hawks point out how bloated and porky the Pentagon has become, Republican Keynesians come out of the woodwork in droves.

So it comes as no surprise that a leading balance-the-budget corporate lobby has been found to have extensive ties to defense contractors.

According to The Public Accountability Initiative, the group Fix The Debt - which advocates for Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security cuts while pushing corporate tax reform - has 38 leaders with “ties to 43 companies with defense contracts totaling $42.3 billion in 2012.”

Boeing’s CEO W. James McNerney is among those on the group’s CEO Council, and Northrop Grumman board member Vic Fazio is on Fix the Debt’s steering committee. Other Fix the Debt linked companies with over $1 billion in defense contracts in 2012 include GE, Textron, Honeywell, and World Fuel Services.



Read more: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2012_12/fix_the_debts_fiscal_bluff_def041886.php



More information here:
http://public-accountability.org/2012/12/operation-fiscal-bluff/

Why are cuts to Social Security on the table? Partly because the MIC says that's the way it has to be.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
1. Occultist Republican Family Greedhead Values
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 04:42 PM
Dec 2012

As usual.

Greedy war-mongering chickenhawk Republican bastards.

Ash_F

(5,861 posts)
5. Maybe, but the first step towards repairing the party is admitting there is a problem.
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:06 PM
Dec 2012

Even on DU, rampart militarism is accepted. We can start by not accepting it.

Chef Eric

(1,024 posts)
7. There are several prominent Democrats involved with Fix the Debt
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:24 PM
Dec 2012

including Ed Rendell, Vic Fazio, and Antonio R. Villaraigosa.

http://www.fixthedebt.org/who-we-are

Fewer Democrats than Republicans, but still too many.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
6. MIC astroturf group promotes cuts in social safety net to protect it's profits. Nice....
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:10 PM
Dec 2012
Conclusion

With a $60 million budget that is heavily focused on public relations, Fix the Debt has
tremendous power to shape the “fiscal cliff” conversation in Washington and beyond. Fix the
Debt’s priorities are bound to be amplified in the media and gain traction in policy talks. So far,
the group has chosen to prioritize social safety net cuts over defense spending cuts.
Fix the Debt’s extensive ties to defense contractors suggest that this focus on social safety net
spending is an all-too-convenient policy stance for the group. As this report documents, its
backers have billions of dollars in financial incentives to keep defense spending cuts off the
table.

If Fix the Debt’s leaders were truly serious about reducing the federal budget deficit, defense
spending cuts would be a priority for the group. Instead, it is aiming its firepower at the social
safety net, focusing blame on Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security recipients – and
distracting attention from the way the defense budget is funneling public dollars into the
pocketbooks of its wealthy corporate backers....

http://public-accountability.org/wp-content/uploads/Operation-Fiscal-Bluff-final.pdf

 
8. The unfortunate side Effect
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:43 PM
Dec 2012

Of the defense cuts would fall disproportional on the troops. Junior and the Enlisted. The big boy toys that benefit certain Congressional Districts, and not necessarily what wins wars, will still be funded fully. They would balance the budget on the backs of the lowest ranks and put them more in danger than ever. Senior leadership and Congress is more than happy to use Our Troops as hostages to take care of their buddies. So just saying cut the defense budget is not enough, those cuts have to be itemized so as not to hurt funding in places that really need it.

underpants

(182,829 posts)
9. I say I say those "cuts" that you Yankee folks are a-speaking 'bout would cost the South JOBS
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:15 AM
Dec 2012

The reason the Republicans are so afraid of defence cuts is because much of the South relies on HUGE DoD spending for their economies

underpants

(182,829 posts)
11. Academi
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 08:40 AM
Dec 2012

thanks- I went looking for the name of that company a few weeks ago and it was nowhere to be found in any news story. "Security contractor" and the like was all that I could find and I specifically googling looking for it. No coincidence I am sure.

maxrandb

(15,334 posts)
12. It's only "Socialism" if it benefits the "little" people
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 03:49 PM
Dec 2012

When it benefits asshats like the CEO of Boeing, it's "sound government".

I swear Napoleon was right; "religion is what keeps the poor from eating the rich".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»"Fix the Debt"-...