nor from over-appraising the importance of the story. It was a comment about a reporter/journalist, especially this one, who are/were high profile and who are more often than not demanding that any little bit of information that catches their fancy, not necessarity what is important just what catches their fancy, be revealed to them *immediately* for them to decide whether it is useful to their careers (as opposed to the public interest) or not. Although Sam dates back to the days when he was one of the boys and the boys might sit on an item if the protaganist was kewl and one of them boys. But today Faux Propaganda Network and Matt SLUDGE would trip over themselves to leak anything like this DUI against whatever Dem.
As for "this changes everything," well, while I'm not surprised that Sam knocks a few down, I had never heard anything that impeached his credibility in his reporting and punditry, but from now on when he's punditeering I'll have it in the back of my mind, like, "Do I trust his judgment NOW?!1" since I am fully in the camp asking why especially people like him who can afford it don't pay somebody to drive them to their fun, so in that sense this DOES change SOMEthing about Senor DONALDSON for me. However, as for being minded by minders, when I logged the same question when Diana ROSS was DUI, a drinking woman replied, "Sometimes we're TIRED of being watched over and just want to do what we want to do!1"
That said, I don't take the grumpiness personally. And in the VFW we call one another "comrade," so I'm relating to the whole enchilada of your DU handle, haha!1
= new reply since forum marked as read
