Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,899 posts)
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:05 PM Dec 2012

U.S. farm-state lawmakers agree to farm subsidy law extension

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON | Sun Dec 30, 2012 12:10pm EST

(Reuters) - Farm-state lawmakers have agreed on a one-year extension of a farm law that, if enacted, would head off a possible doubling of U.S. milk prices to $7.OO or more a gallon in 2013.

The compromise resulted from bipartisan discussions in the House of Representatives' Agriculture Committee and talks with colleagues in the U.S. Senate, Frank Lucas of Oklahoma, the House panel's chairman, said in a statement on Sunday.

"It is not perfect - no compromise ever is - but it is my sincere hope that it will pass the House and Senate and be signed by the President by January 1," Lucas, a Republican, said.

(Reporting by Jim Wolf; Editing by Maureen Bavdek; )

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/30/us-farm-bill-compromise-idUSBRE8BT07T20121230

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. farm-state lawmakers agree to farm subsidy law extension (Original Post) Eugene Dec 2012 OP
socialism! Enrique Dec 2012 #1
Good news. I hope it's comprehensive, i.e. pinto Dec 2012 #2
Pretty sure it's a separate deal. They're looking to cut the hell out of any.... DCKit Dec 2012 #7
Yeah. I was thinking this might be a "carve out" from the larger legislation. pinto Dec 2012 #10
Why not let prices rise. zeemike Dec 2012 #3
All I know John2 Dec 2012 #5
Heavy burden for young families songbookz Dec 2012 #6
Wow. An 11th hour deal. WhoWoodaKnew Dec 2012 #4
The big misdirection is the statement about milk prices eilen Dec 2012 #8
Its about food stamps, elleng Dec 2012 #9

pinto

(106,886 posts)
2. Good news. I hope it's comprehensive, i.e.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:13 PM
Dec 2012

includes funding for federal / state nutrition programs that fall under the overall law.

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
7. Pretty sure it's a separate deal. They're looking to cut the hell out of any....
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:55 PM
Dec 2012

aid to women and children. I believe there are three programs on the chopping block.

pinto

(106,886 posts)
10. Yeah. I was thinking this might be a "carve out" from the larger legislation.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 05:14 PM
Dec 2012

We'll see pretty soon.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
3. Why not let prices rise.
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 02:14 PM
Dec 2012

I can think of good reason to do it myself...for one most milk is used by kids to put on their sugary cereals and with less of it they will eat less of that crap.
Secondly it would make local milk producers better off in competing with the mega farms for market share....and again better for health because no growth hormones and chemicals in the milk...I would love to see the day where an independent dairy producer did well and sold directly to the public.
But whatever congress does it will benefit the corporation.

songbookz

(23 posts)
6. Heavy burden for young families
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 03:36 PM
Dec 2012

$8 dollar a gal milk would place a heavy burden on young families. Milk is needed for children under 2 who are off formula or breast milk. My grandchildren don't get sugary cereal when they spend the night or when I babysit while school's out. They get (generic versions of) Cheerios and Raisin bran.

eilen

(4,950 posts)
8. The big misdirection is the statement about milk prices
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 04:08 PM
Dec 2012

This is a deal to ensure big subsidies to corn growers/agribusiness. This deal will ensure the free flow of HFCS because believe me, those obese little snowflakes didn't get that way drinking milk.

elleng

(130,918 posts)
9. Its about food stamps,
Sun Dec 30, 2012, 04:18 PM
Dec 2012

and cantor wouldn't permit votes.

'But the House bill, with large cuts in food-stamp funding for lower-income Americans, has never been brought to a vote by the full House. The Senate and House have for months remained far apart on the issues of food stamps and crop subsidies.

Lucas said the year-long extension "provides certainty to our producers and critical disaster assistance to those affected by record drought conditions."

It would also mean another round of the direct subsidies to farmers that cost about $5 billion a year, and that both sides of debate had agreed earlier to eliminate.'

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. farm-state lawmakers...