Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:27 PM Jan 2013

ACLU Condemns Court for Keeping Details of Obama’s Assassination Program Secret

Source: Raw Story

ACLU condemns court for keeping details of Obama’s assassination program secret

By Stephen C. Webster
Wednesday, January 2, 2013 15:58 EST

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Wednesday that it was saddened by a New York’s judge’s decision to keep secret most details pertaining to an Obama administration program that has so far assassinated three American citizens, including one who was not accused of being involved with terrorism.

A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the ACLU, seeking to determine the administration’s legal justification for killing American citizens without charge or trial, was shot down Wednesday (PDF) by the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. The court ruled in favor of the administration’s motion for summary judgement on the basis that deliberations over the program were privileged communications, and the ACLU failed to show why they should be exposed to the public.

The three Americans killed by the military’s anti-terrorist strikes are Anwar Al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, and Al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son Abdulrahman.

“This ruling denies the public access to crucial information about the government’s extrajudicial killing of U.S. citizens and also effectively green-lights its practice of making selective and self-serving disclosures,” ACLU deputy legal director Jameel Jaffer said in an advisory.

“As the judge acknowledges, the targeted killing program raises profound questions about the appropriate limits on government power in our constitutional democracy,” Jaffer added. “The public has a right to know more about the circumstances in which the government believes it can lawfully kill people, including U.S. citizens, who are far from any battlefield and have never been charged with a crime.”


Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/02/aclu-condemns-court-for-keeping-details-of-obamas-assassination-program-secret

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ACLU Condemns Court for Keeping Details of Obama’s Assassination Program Secret (Original Post) Hissyspit Jan 2013 OP
In other words ... GeorgeGist Jan 2013 #1
The what?? xoom Jan 2013 #4
Whats this? Assassination program? WTF? bunnies Jan 2013 #2
It was reported on by NYT, Washington Post, Democracy Now, Salon.com, and many other news sites. bananas Jan 2013 #6
Jeebus. I must be livin under a rock. bunnies Jan 2013 #18
Here's some good reading on how Obama is shredding the Constitution. Read it and weep. kath Jan 2013 #7
ugh. bunnies Jan 2013 #19
K&R Solly Mack Jan 2013 #3
"including one [US citizen] who was not accused of being involved with terrorism" FiveGoodMen Jan 2013 #5
Priviledged communications upheld; ACLU failed to show why they should be exposed to the public. Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #8
kick n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2013 #9
I wish more people would pay attention to this issue. thebard77 Jan 2013 #10
Justice McMahon kicked some pretty serious butt in that ruling. The NYT made a better case than msanthrope Jan 2013 #11
They COULD tell you, but then they'd have to kill you. blkmusclmachine Jan 2013 #12
This. n/t DeSwiss Jan 2013 #14
Can You Smell the Fascism Yet? triplepoint Jan 2013 #13
K&R DeSwiss Jan 2013 #15
Were they in the Middle East or in the US davidpdx Jan 2013 #16
Post removed Post removed Jan 2013 #17

kath

(10,565 posts)
7. Here's some good reading on how Obama is shredding the Constitution. Read it and weep.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 07:47 PM
Jan 2013

(Sadly, I don't know how to copy and paste links on this damned IPad) Article is on Truthout, title "John Cusack interviews law professor Jonathan Turley about Obama administration's war on the Constitution"
Not just shredding the Constitution but also violating international law and Nuremberg principals. Lovely.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
5. "including one [US citizen] who was not accused of being involved with terrorism"
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 06:59 PM
Jan 2013

How the hell are people okay with this???!!!

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
8. Priviledged communications upheld; ACLU failed to show why they should be exposed to the public.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 08:47 PM
Jan 2013

ACLU, please go back and try again.


This has always been beyond disgusting.

 

thebard77

(37 posts)
10. I wish more people would pay attention to this issue.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jan 2013

When people say that they love Obama and they love their president, I often wonder if they are aware of this. If they are aware of this and don't care well then they support using the bill of rights as toilet paper. I only voted for congressional and local candidates this past November because honestly, I can't get past a president using his authority to kill American citizens without due process. THere was no way in hell that I was going to vote for Romney so there was no Obama support from me. I realize that my single vote is meaningless in the grand scheme of things but it allows me to hold some shred of dignity. I will not support any politician that hides behind unconstitutional laws such as NDAA and the Patriot Act to act as judge, jury and executioner in the form of a drone strike.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
11. Justice McMahon kicked some pretty serious butt in that ruling. The NYT made a better case than
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 09:45 PM
Jan 2013

the ACLU, that much is clear, but they aren't getting the Koh memo.


Clinton appointee, put forward by Senator Moynihan.

 

blkmusclmachine

(16,149 posts)
12. They COULD tell you, but then they'd have to kill you.
Wed Jan 2, 2013, 11:47 PM
Jan 2013

A Police State answers to no one.

.
Operation Northwoods: The 9/11 You Never Knew

 

triplepoint

(431 posts)
13. Can You Smell the Fascism Yet?
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 01:12 AM
Jan 2013

Obsession with National Security (#7 of "The 14 Characteristics of Fascism&quot :

"Inevitably, a national security apparatus was under direct control of the ruling elite. It was usually an instrument of oppression, operating in secret and beyond any constraints. Its actions were justified under the rubric of protecting “national security,” and questioning its activities was portrayed as unpatriotic or even treasonous."
.
.
.
*Reference Link:
"Fascism Anyone?" by Laurence W. Britt
http://www.secularhumanism.org/index.php?section=library&page=britt_23_2

 

DeSwiss

(27,137 posts)
15. K&R
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 01:24 AM
Jan 2013
"Americans like to talk about Democracy but, when put to the test, usually find it to be an 'inconvenience.' We have opted instead for an authoritarian system *disguised* as a Democracy. We pay through the nose for an enormous joke-of-a-government, let it push us around, and then wonder how all those assholes got in there." ~ Frank Zappa


- That pretty much covers it Frank.........


davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
16. Were they in the Middle East or in the US
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 04:16 AM
Jan 2013

they said the people were not near any battlefield. What is the definition of a battlefield? Could they be in Afghanistan or Pakistan and still be considered not in a battlefield? What about other parts of the Middle East?

Response to davidpdx (Reply #16)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»ACLU Condemns Court for K...