Trump Assures Public the New White House Ballroom Will Have a 'Drone-Free Roof'

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: MEDIAite

Dec 29th, 2025, 11:59 pm


President Donald Trump informed the public that the massive new ballroom he is constructing will be impervious to drone attacks.

Since his inauguration in January, Trump has personally overseen the remodeling of several government buildings. He paved over the Rose Garden, demolished the East Wing of the White House to make way for a gigantic ballroom, added his name to the Kennedy Center, and created a “Presidential Walk of Fame” in the White House, among other redesigns.

The president is in the process of building a ballroom where the East Wing stood. This month, he fired the previous ballroom architect, who warned that a 90,000-square-foot ballroom would dwarf the 55,000-square-foot White House.

On Monday, Trump made a joint press appearance with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who visited the president at Mar-a-Lago. Trump reiterated his threat to fire Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May. While scolding Powell for alleged cost overruns in the remodeling of the Federal Reserve’s headquarters, Trump boasted of his grand plans for the ballroom, which he said will host inaugurations while also being “drone-free”:

Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/trump-assures-public-the-new-white-house-ballroom-will-have-a-drone-free-roof/

[Attilatheblond]

1. Can't have billionaire donors facing the same kinds of violence the rest of the world deals with.

Wish they understood that abusing society is what make society dangerous.

[Traildogbob]

4. Damn spot on.

If there were ever a sticker that needed be posted everywhere.
“abusing society is what makes society dangerous”.
Profoundly factual.

[Attilatheblond]

2. What's he gonna do to stop the threat of justifiably pissed off wait staff and kitchen staff taking action?

Hey Bogus Potus, the calls are coming from inside the house.

[Ray Bruns]

3. So what are we up to now? Half a billion dollars?

[Ocelot II]

5. Oh, that's nice to know. But the WH is already in a prohibited area,

where it's illegal to fly any kind of aircraft, so, no drones anyhow. WTF are the noises he makes with his face supposed to mean this time?

[Harker]

9. He just thinks it makes it him sound smart.

[taxi]

6. Drone free roof. That's all well and good.

What about the missiles that some drones launch?

[bucolic_frolic]

7. There will be gofundme's to tear it down and rebuild the old White House

This is an abomination

[Blues Heron]

8. His brain is beginning to resemble a sea sponge with gaping voids where neurons once lived

[maxsolomon]

10. "Full Spectrum Dominance" - S. Cheung

Same but different stupid shit every day.

[2na fisherman]

11. He Feels Vulnerable

Why would he mention such security measures if he wasn't painfully aware of his fear of being attacked? He reveals his subconscious awareness that his increasingly insane behavior makes most people hate him and want to attack him. And since he was already shot at, he is in full paranoia mode and feels justified in building up the white house into his personal fortress. But he fails to realize that his own Maga people may also wish to harm him in another version of the January 6th attack, but one which comes from inside the White House when they feel betrayed by him.

[QueerDuck]

12. What's he afraid of? Is he building an underground bunker too?

We'll have our very own Reich Chancellery Air-Raid Shelter (Luftschutzbunker der Reichskanzlei) and Führerbunker.

[twodogsbarking]

13. I'm hoping it will have a tomb.

[IcyPeas]

14. The next Miss Teen USA Beauty Pageant can be held there...

and the girls won't have to fear a drone strike.

[Vinca]

15. I don't care if the roof is "drone proof." In fact, that would save the cost of tearing it down.

[tonekat]

16. I'd pay good money

To watch a drone chase trump around before it exploded in his face.

[EarthFirst]

17. So what's that add to the current $400 million price tag?

Another $600 million under the guise of ‘national security’ billed to the taxpayer?