Judge Incredulous as Trump Lawyer Asks Him to Create New Law for Mark Kelly Retribution Crusade
Source: Talking Points Memo
02.03.26 | 5:58 pm
WASHINGTON, DCFederal District Court Judge Richard Leon expressed shock Tuesday that the Trump Justice Department was asking him to break new First Amendment ground, the better to punish Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) for speaking out against the administration.
Youre asking me to do something that the Supreme Court has never done thats a bit of a stretch, is it not? the George W. Bush-appointed judge asked DOJs John Bailey.
The Trump administration tried during the hearing to argue that the diminished speech rights that apply to the active duty military meant to preserve obedience and discipline should apply to Kelly, who is retired, as well. Thats never been done before, Leon said. Kelly sat in the front row during Tuesdays hearing in a bright blue suit, flanked by staffers.
Leon seemed particularly perturbed about Kellys situation specifically that, under the Trump administrations new proposed rule, retired members of the military serving in Congress could be punished for criticizing the Pentagon. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth trained his fire on Kelly after the senator appeared in a video with other members of Congress advising members of the military that they cannot follow illegal orders. The administration launched a process aimed at demoting Kellys rank and jeopardizing his retirement benefits.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/judge-mark-kelly-hegseth-rank
Trumpdumper
(227 posts)Hegseth will regret this monstrous overreach to his dying day. He should be tarred and feathered.
MarcoZandrini
(196 posts).being led by the incontinent.
Joinfortmill
(21,188 posts)Martin Eden
(15,635 posts)Punish critics, intimidate others to keep their mouths shut.
Ray Bruns
(6,380 posts)Dave Bowman
(7,169 posts)MLWR
(1,028 posts)MLWR
(1,028 posts)chouchou
(3,148 posts)Yes..I know. I have no answers.
erronis
(23,916 posts)Over and over.
The more ridiculous the case brought by the administration, the more crap that gums up the system.
And the more that the rubes think it never worked.
Beartracks
(14,609 posts)... when someone reminds the military they are duty-bound to not follow illegal orders.
=========
aggiesal
(10,816 posts)Aristus
(72,201 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,800 posts)Do it for me. - Donny Dumbfuck
House of Roberts
(6,535 posts)When he was elected Senator, his full free speech rights were not only restored but enhanced to include not being persecuted for speech in the course of his official duties.
Martin68
(27,758 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,188 posts)FakeNoose
(41,679 posts)Senator Mark Kelly is a hero and a man of honor. Why should he be prevented from speaking out freely in whatever way he feels necessary? If a federal judge can deny a US Senator his constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of speech, then he can also deny the same thing to a sitting president.
Is that what the Repukes want?
Marie Marie
(11,318 posts)NBachers
(19,444 posts)If Mark decides to run in 2028, he'll be on my short list. He'd be an effective campaigner, communicator, and debater
https://secure.actblue.com/my-express/engagement-hub/205245
Ray Bruns
(6,380 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,875 posts)and essentially make Congress and the Courts "ceremonial only".
I.e., "a dictatorship".