DOJ sends bundle of completely censored documents in response to ACLU lawsuit
Source: Raw Story
Responding to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Department of Justice (DOJ) turned over a bundle of documents that are completely blacked out.
The lawsuit was filed after the DOJ ignored a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking information on how the agency interpreted a 2011 Supreme Court decision (PDF) that bans law enforcement from using GPS technology to track Americans without a warrant.
The Department responded to the lawsuit with 111 pages of attorney memos, but only two pages are legible. The rest are covered by large black rectangles that blot out all useful information.
The Justice Departments unfortunate decision leaves Americans with no clear understanding of when we will be subjected to trackingpossibly for months at a timeor whether the government will first get a warrant, ACLU staff attorney Catherine Crump explained in a statement.
Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/17/doj-sends-bundle-of-completely-censored-documents-in-response-to-aclu-lawsuit/
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)Other than that, he's doing pretty good if one doesn't nit pick.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Holder is a disaster. Banksters run wild while gardeners go to jail. You really think that's "pretty good"?
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)...let's cut Eric some slack. Right?
- I mean he's gotten a lot of real criminals off the streets.
[center]
[/center]
[font color=red size=1]{Posted for the irony & sarcasm-impaired}[/font]
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)csziggy
(34,136 posts)Not WIF!
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)It's gray, it's grey.
Since justice went away.
Department of Justice GPS tracking memo 1, page 2 -http://www.scribd.com/doc/120826594/Department-of-Justice-GPS-tracking-memo-1
Unbelievable. If only it wasn't true.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)While gun nuts are twisting their panties about "tyranny" and "freedom", there are very real freedoms that have been lost and civil rights violations going on right under their noses.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)Constantly. Consistently. I call them out on it every time they vomit some nonsense about their freedoms.
It usually begins with: Remember around October 01 when Bush, The Lesser.........? Where was your whining screeching voice then?
These people live in an alternate reality and they can keep it.
AnneD
(15,774 posts)after the Patriot Act and the repeal of Habeas Corpus. Not everyone on the firing range is a RW nut job.
yardwork
(61,599 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I'll admit, it was kinda funny when they did it to Issa.
Not so funny now. :/
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)Dude, that's extreme.
I guess when you are transitioning quickly into a Neo-fascist National Security State,
you can't be too careful about those "of"s and "the"s getting loose, and exposing
national secrets.
kaiden
(1,314 posts)And it IS very assholey.
onenote
(42,700 posts)FOIA contains several statutory exceptions that relieve an agency from its obligation to disclose internal documents. They include an exception for "privileged inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters" (which would include documents subject to attorney-client privilege) and documents compiloed for law enforcement purposes, the release of which could be expected to disclose techniques, procedures, or guidelines for investigations or prosecutions.
Under the circumstances, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for DOJ to disclose the documents in question or for a court to tell them that that they are required to do so.
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... sets of Law in this nation. There's Law for us, and Law for the government, Wall street Banksters, Mitt Romney-types (the 1%), and Corporatistas.
If you or I were called to court and ordered by Law to provide documents, and went so far as to offer 99.9% redacted documents, we would be held in contempt of court.
But. If the Dept of Justice of the USG is called to court to do the same thing, and they indeed offer 111 pages of 99.9% redacted documents, why are they not held in contempt? Why are they, the Dept of Justice of the USG, above the Law? Why is Wall Street above the Law? Why are the 1% and the Corporations above the Law?
I wasn't able to read the entire article at the link. Did the Dept of Justice site National Security as it's reason for offering the redacted documents?
And exactly how can we the people obey the Law when they won't explain the reason for tracking the people in the first place? Why does the Dept of Justice not have to get a warrant to track the people? For all the world, this reminds me of the days of Herbert Hoover and the Frank Church Cointelpro hearings, except that there are no hearings. Are we a rogue nation now? Can anyone define what a rogue nation is to me? Thanks IDemo for the post!
onenote
(42,700 posts)"Privileged inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters" (which would include documents subject to attorney-client privilege) and/or
documents compiloed for law enforcement purposes, the release of which could be expected to disclose techniques, procedures, or guidelines for investigations or prosecutions.
Both would appear to apply on their face to the documents the ACLU requested, so I wouldn't expect ACLU to prevail if/when it takes DOJ to court over this.
Kick to drown out the nonsense
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...with John Ashcroft and Alberto Gonzales.
I was wrong.
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their rhetoric, promises, or excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)K&R