Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands abdicates in favour of son
Source: Guardian
Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, the oldest reigning Dutch monarch, announced her abdication on Monday evening in a sudden move three days before her 75th birthday.
After 33 years on the throne following her mother's abdication in 1980, Beatrix said she would relinquish the crown at the end of April, leaving the monarchy to Crown-Prince Willem-Alexander, the oldest of her three sons.
The queen went on national television and radio on Monday evening to announce the departure, having recorded the broadcast earlier in the day. The prime minister, Mark Rutte, delivered a statement on television shortly afterwards, with both stressing that the crown prince had been intensively prepared for the role of monarch.
"The queen was there for us in good times, but also in bad times. Her knowledge and compassion made her an icon of the Netherlands," Rutte said in his statement.
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/28/queen-beatrix-netherlands-abdicates
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)derby378
(30,252 posts)Even if her duties are for the most part ceremonial, she's definitely earned her retirement.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Worried senior
(1,328 posts)there are days I really wish they hadn't.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)Just ... you know ... askin' ....
SwissTony
(2,560 posts)They have a couple of kids.
She's very popular in Holland (I live in Holland).
loudsue
(14,087 posts)A Bilderberger.
Mosby
(16,306 posts)Just in case democracy does not work out?
I think the whole thing is fucking weird.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)We're just finw with it which is all that matters.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,868 posts)If your country wants to piss away 113m a year then by all means. Mosby was just asking a question and I think its valid.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Last edited Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:13 PM - Edit history (1)
What you got for a dollar ?
Yes - should've said don't be concerned.
progressoid
(49,988 posts)Lydia Leftcoast
(48,217 posts)Major shareholders in Shell oil and all that?
brooklynite
(94,520 posts)From what I understand, the Dutch Monarchy is a pretty low cost operation.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)fishiefish
(23 posts)It would be like me walking around in a pirates outfit and demanding to be taken seriously.
obamanut2012
(26,068 posts)Queen Wilhelmina and her family escaped to Britain, where she set up a government, and was a huge morale booster for those living under the Nazis in the Netherlands. Or so family friends who lived through all of this have said, as well as reading I've done.
Her SIL, Princess *and later Queen) Juliana's husband Prince Bernard, was an RAF Wing Commander, and was an active fighter pilot during WWII.
I find them one of the more interesting of Europe's monarchies.
on edit: Queen Wilhelmina had to be forced to flee the Netherlands during the Nazi invasion. She wanted to retreat to a more remote part of her country. Advisers convinced her she would be defeated and captured, and would be more use in an exile government. She was. She was also about 60 when this happened. She kicked ass.
It's worth reading the WWII part: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilhelmina_of_the_Netherlands#World_War_II
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)would do the same.
Then... let's see...
http://www.canalsuralacarta.es/directo/ver/flamenco-radio
Vive La France. Viva la Revolución.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Doing just fine as far as c. 70% of our population are concerned which is all that matters.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Could be a hell of a lot worse...
Or, wait...
:wry grin:
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)How come US military is still all over UK? Didn't we pay them off already?
¿Madame?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)I think they may have been uprated a bit due to Iraq. Funnily enough the son-in-law of a friend in US is on his second placement whatever at RAF Molesworth now. When he's here he doesn't actually leave the country.
Madame ? : no Bloke/Geezer.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)due to the Mildenhall and Lakenheath American airbases. Only only other council in the whole country has a higher percentage of people born in another country other than the UK - Tower Hamlets, with people born in Bangladesh (15.3%).
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)In March 2011, the population of Forest Heath was 59,700, made up of 25,400 households. These figures suggest that Forest Heath has grown by nearly 7.5% over the last ten years. Whilst the population has been ageing, the district had a more youthful profile than the rest of the region, with almost two thirds of the population being working age (15-64) and only 5% aged 65 or over, an update of this information from Census 2011 will not be available until later in the year.
Forest Heath is the most ethnically diverse district in Suffolk (13.2% of the population was non-white in June 2009, compared to the national average of 12.5%) and has the largest foreign population in the county. The 2009 Annual Population Survey suggested that over 15% of the population are non-UK nationals, compared to a Suffolk average of 4.2%.
The district's diversity and youthful age profile can be attributed to the presence of the United States Air Force in Europe (USAFE) bases in Mildenhall and Lakenheath and the number of migrant workers in the district's horse racing and agricultural industries.
http://www.forest-heath.gov.uk/info/100004/council_and_democracy/526/about_the_district
Your figure was 13% which represents about 7700. I'm not disputing it but sounds a bit high for two bases ?
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)59,748 people, with 7,746 people born in the USA. Perhaps there's a tendency for some Americans to stay in the area after they leave the Air Force?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)By coincidence my neighbour , who is from St Louis , was based here mid fifties with the US Army down the road apiece at the old Linconsfield base where the US 8th Airforce Fighter Command was during the war and he did exactly that - stayed here.
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=389491
"Madame" referred to Q of UK. Who doesn't even listen to, let alone reply to, remarks from mere mortals.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,311 posts)Spain - Prop.: His Majesty Juan Carlos Alfonso Víctor María de Borbón y Borbón-Dos Sicilias
Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Bloke I was talking to in a pub in S. Devon on my way through (to catch the ferry out) the other day, local, with a son in the RAF based at one of those (shared) locations down in Cornwall, watching the Western Approaches, mentioned that in some recent highly technical exercises the UK lads did a better job than the cousins, by far, he said he said...
Now, a bit of healthy competition and/or collaboration can sometimes be a fine thing. That way everybody wins, right? Only question is: who pays; who really pays... in the end.
Similarly, in Spain. The Rota base, amongst many others, for example, is essencial to the USA's current projection of power, um, let's just say, beyond its borders. I'm sure much is learned and/or otherwise gained from such, uh, collaboration, by all sides. But, nevertheless, one has to ask: Who's paying? Who's really paying? What price?
Edit: ... And, by way of laterally-thinking illustration I'll append today's following DU thread from the fine Octafish: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022304958
¡Salud! Santé.
underpants
(182,789 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Very clever.