Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 04:36 AM Feb 2013

Immigration detainees released in budget crunch

Source: Associated Press

Immigration detainees released in budget crunch

By E. J. TAMARA, Immigration detainees released in budget crunch

By E. J. TAMARA, Associated Press | February 25, 2013 | Updated: February 25, 2013 9:44pm| February 25, 2013 | Updated: February 25, 2013 9:44pm

LOS ANGELES (AP) — The Associated Press has learned that federal immigration authorities have released a number of detainees around the country to save money.

Gillian Christensen, spokeswoman for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Washington, D.C., said Monday that field offices have been directed to review their numbers of detained immigrants to ensure the jail populations stay within budgeted resources.

Christensen says an unspecified number of immigrants have been released and placed on more cost-effective forms of supervision.

She says she did not have further details about those forms of supervision or how many people have been released.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/texas/article/Immigration-detainees-released-in-budget-crunch-4307768.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Immigration detainees released in budget crunch (Original Post) Judi Lynn Feb 2013 OP
Hopefully....... TinkerTot55 Feb 2013 #1
I agree but I am sickened by the jailings. dotymed Feb 2013 #3
should be the rule daybranch Feb 2013 #2
That's why Arizona watoos Feb 2013 #4
Kick... n/t Tx4obama Feb 2013 #5
...and Republicans IMMEDIATELY call for a vote against sequester. alp227 Feb 2013 #6
Seems to me that sending them back to their home countries would be cheaper than "supervising" them. Pterodactyl Feb 2013 #7

TinkerTot55

(198 posts)
1. Hopefully.......
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 07:28 AM
Feb 2013

....some families are reunited, although it's only a temporary solution, I assume.

Still, what a relief to some families!

dotymed

(5,610 posts)
3. I agree but I am sickened by the jailings.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:02 AM
Feb 2013

I wonder how much of our money was used to apprehend these desperado's?

daybranch

(1,309 posts)
2. should be the rule
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:02 AM
Feb 2013

these more cost effective forms of supervision rather than a forced exception. It would save many millions of dollars and relieve a lot of misery.

 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
4. That's why Arizona
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 08:42 AM
Feb 2013

wrote its immigration law, privatized prizons, baby. We are the only civilized nation that deliberately imprisons people just to make money.

alp227

(32,027 posts)
6. ...and Republicans IMMEDIATELY call for a vote against sequester.
Tue Feb 26, 2013, 11:23 PM
Feb 2013

Over a politically convenient issue: the ILLEGALS.

I wonder how many if these immigrants served time in private prisons though. And they better not release anyone suspected or convicted of drug/sexual/violent crime!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Immigration detainees rel...