Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boombaby

(139 posts)
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:45 PM Feb 2012

NYT: U.S. Planning to Slash Iraq Embassy Staff by Up to Half

BAGHDAD — Less than two months after American troops left, the State Department is preparing to slash by as much as half the enormous diplomatic presence it had planned for Iraq, a sharp sign of declining American influence in the country.

Officials in Baghdad and Washington said that Ambassador James F. Jeffrey and other senior State Department officials are reconsidering the size and scope of the embassy, where the staff has swelled to nearly 16,000 people, mostly contractors.

The expansive diplomatic operation and the $750 million embassy building, the largest of its kind in the world, were billed as necessary to nurture a postwar Iraq on its shaky path to democracy and establish normal relations between two countries linked by blood and mutual suspicion. But the Americans have been frustrated by Iraqi obstructionism and are now largely confined to the embassy because of security concerns, unable to interact enough with ordinary Iraqis to justify the $6 billion annual price tag.

The swift realization among some top officials that the diplomatic build-up may have been ill-advised represents a remarkable pivot for the State Department, in that officials spent more than a year planning the expansion and that many of the thousands of additional personnel have only recently arrived. Michael W. McClellan, the embassy spokesman, said in a statement, “over the last year and continuing this year the Department of State and the Embassy in Baghdad have been considering ways to appropriately reduce the size of the U.S. mission in Iraq, primarily by decreasing the number of contractors needed to support the embassy’s operations.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/08/world/middleeast/united-states-planning-to-slash-iraq-embassy-staff-by-half.html?_r=1&hp

Is there an emoticon for puking in your hand, carrying it to a warmongering neighbor's house, and throwing the vomit at his door? Just asking.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

gateley

(62,683 posts)
1. I'm curious as to why the Bush admin felt we needed such a huge presence there.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:49 PM
Feb 2012

Was this begun when they were still under the illusion that we would essentially be taking over the country? Were they grooming their new Shaw?

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
2. Can Bush be blamed for the size of the embassy staff?
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 02:55 PM
Feb 2012

I think most of the staffing must have been done under HRC's watch. Bush was maybe responsible for the buildings.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
4. Bush buillt the world's largest embassy
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:15 PM
Feb 2012
The World's Biggest Embassy (104 acres, 22 buildings, thousands of staff members, a $116 million vehicle inventory), physically larger than the Vatican, was a sign of our commitment, at least our commitment to excess. "Along with the Great Wall of China," said the ambassador, "it's one of those things you can see with the naked eye from outer space." The newly opened embassy was made up of large office buildings, the main one built around a four-story atrium, with overhead lights that resembled sails. If someone had told us there was a Bath & Body Works in there, we would not have thought it odd.

--more--
http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/09/baghdad-peter-van-buren-we-meant-well

Yeah, Bush can be blamed for the size of the embassy staff...

SharonAnn

(13,772 posts)
14. Bush thought we'd be controlling their oil production and running the country..
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 06:01 PM
Feb 2012

Boy, was he wrong!

Amonester

(11,541 posts)
10. Yep. Just to sit in there, staring at blank sheets of paper all day.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 08:22 PM
Feb 2012

All the while, US bridges and roads need urgent repairs, and only get budget cuts!

All hail the cheneys and bu$hies!

 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
6. Those coy Iraqis, still holding out with the flowers and candy.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:32 PM
Feb 2012

Why won't they just admit how much they love U.S.?

kemah

(276 posts)
7. Maybe the shoes thrown at Bush had candy in them.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:36 PM
Feb 2012

They were candy shoes, thrown with love and admiration. It was the lame stream media who said they were made of leather. In the video it is hard to tell, but chocolate shoes look a lot like leather shoes in cams.

 

penndragon69

(788 posts)
8. Isn't it obviouse.
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 03:57 PM
Feb 2012

The shear scale of the embassy screams the name of the contractors
who designed and built this monstrosity...can you say
HALIBURTION and BECKTEL.

All that money flowed back into the dark lord CHENNYS pockets.

 

Obama3_16

(157 posts)
9. Ahahaha I am Sooooo happy to hear this. I was concerned
Tue Feb 7, 2012, 04:43 PM
Feb 2012

That with a giant castle fortress in Bagshad, the U.S. was going to run Iraq as a colony. I think that was the ideal plan of Neocons. Thank goodness that crazy mofo McCain didn't make it into the White House.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
13. look at the photo on top of the article: they've got a roof larger than the building for...
Wed Feb 8, 2012, 01:57 PM
Feb 2012

the last helicopters out of town.

I guess they DID learn something from Vietnam.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NYT: U.S. Planning to Sla...