Lindsey Graham targets Hillary Clinton on Benghazi
Source: Politico
Sen. Lindsey Graham on Tuesday predicted that the dam is about to break on Benghazi, and said that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would shoulder some blame.
I think the dam is about to break on Benghazi, Graham (R-S.C.) wrote on his Facebook page. Were going to find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks. Were going to find political manipulation seven weeks before an election. Were going to find people asleep at the switch when it comes to the State Department, including Hillary Clinton.
Graham has been a vocal critic of the Obama administration for its handling of the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Amb. Chris Stevens, among others.
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/lindsey-graham-targets-hillary-clinton-on-benghazi-91011.html
Golly! I didn't see that coming.....
Deep13
(39,156 posts)Roland99
(53,345 posts):yawn:
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Republicans have ever done.
Dustlawyer
(10,518 posts)for jobs, Wall Street reform...
Beacool
(30,308 posts)Lindsey should remember how well it went for his party the last time they tried to demonize the Clintons.
blm
(113,791 posts)would have been evacuated immediately after the first tower was hit.
Bush refused to allow any investigation for over a year and the corpmedia was too scared of Bush to call him out. Lindsey Graham was in full support of Bush and cared nothing for the loss of lives due to Bush's stewardship of information important to this nation.
GO TO HELL, LINDSEY, you cowardly, lying sack of crap.
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)"...find a system failure before, during, and after the attacks..."
It's the same system failure that allows you to sit on the Armed Services, Homeland Security and Judiciary committees. And I think we will also find "political manipulation" and "people asleep at the switch." But I don't think it will be quite what you think it's going to be...
"Senator."
AndyA
(16,993 posts)I can't remember which MSNBC show it was on, but there was a segment about all the previous embassy tragedies during Dubya's term in office, and the Republicons sure didn't make a big stink about them.
The biggie for me was 9/11/2001--if you want to talk about a complete, utter failure to protect--that would be it. The GOP sure didn't demand to know why warnings weren't heeded by Bushco. I really don't think any of the Republicons care about who died, they're just using this as a political device.
marble falls
(61,997 posts)Mr. David
(535 posts)that was 100% entirely the Republicans fault (cut on security on embassies)
And they are still *TRYING* to divert responsibility to Clinton.
maxrandb
(15,837 posts)and we're all still breathlessly awaiting the video of President Clinton burning the American Flag in Russia...ya' know, the video the right-wingers kept promising us...oh, and the Michelle Obama "Whitie" tape...and on and on "ad nauseum".
Fuck you...you fucking Paul Lynd voiced ass-pickle!
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)now he's after Hillary. I'll take Hillary in that battle every single time.
LuckyLib
(6,887 posts)roping in the idiot Republicans in congress and get something done! You are a disgrace to your state and our country.
kimbutgar
(23,172 posts)While it is sad 4 Americans died why aren't they screaming about the 4000+ American who died in Iraq over bush's lies?
DCKit
(18,541 posts)I think that maybe he's not so sure of himself anymore.
Besides, everyone knows the 'murkin public has the attention span of a gnat (or a Republican voter). By next fall, they will have forgotten this manufactured "scandal".
If there's anything at all to it, it's that Congress voted to cut funding for security at our embassies.
MjolnirTime
(1,800 posts)2014 can't come soon enough for this jackass.
DallasNE
(7,547 posts)And reminiscent of the McCarthy era.
Yes, he is looking to knock Obama down a peg or two but more importantly he is looking ahead to 2016 and trying to dirty Hilary Clinton so she won't get in the race.
The problem with endlessly investigating the same thing and nothing new turns up is then backlash sets in because the purpose becomes clear that it is not about finding the facts but looking for political dirt. I think that we are probably already at this point. The other thing that is damning for Graham is that Secretary Clinton requested increased funding for embassy security but every single Republican voted "no". Since none of these hearing address perhaps the key issue (funding history) then they really serve no real purpose.