Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 05:42 PM Aug 2013

IRS issues final rules on Obamacare's 'individual mandate'

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - The Internal Revenue Service issued final rules on Tuesday for the individual mandate of President Barack Obama's healthcare overhaul, one of the most contentious elements of the U.S. law set to go into effect next year.

...

The IRS, which is administering parts of the law involving revenue collection, released the final rules spelling out the details of what constitutes minimum essential coverage, and how individuals are responsible for spouses, children and other dependents, among other topics.

...

The rules announced on Tuesday offered good news to employees getting health coverage through a union-sponsored plan. They clarify that these employees will not be penalized, said tax lawyers who reviewed the rules on Tuesday.

The IRS rules also said employees getting healthcare coverage from a temporary staffing agency are safe from penalties.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/27/us-usa-irs-obamacare-idUSBRE97Q10T20130827?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews



.pdf of the finalized rules: (shortened clickable link): http://1.usa.gov/16KH08p

Additional article on the finalized rules with information not in the Reuters article:
http://www.benefitspro.com/2013/08/27/irs-completes-health-penalty-rules


17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IRS issues final rules on Obamacare's 'individual mandate' (Original Post) PoliticAverse Aug 2013 OP
Going through the thing. Fucking. Nightmare. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #1
it's the IRS -- created to manufacture the necessity for professional accountants Supersedeas Aug 2013 #2
I'm not looking forward to this at all as a caseworker. Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #4
It sounds unconstitutional Mnpaul Aug 2013 #3
No. nt msanthrope Aug 2013 #5
Y'all lost that battle. Deal. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #6
Lost what battle? Mnpaul Aug 2013 #7
You mean like the progressive income tax system we have now? itsrobert Aug 2013 #8
That isn't the same thing Mnpaul Aug 2013 #9
If I serve in a combat zone in the miltiary itsrobert Aug 2013 #10
A military exemption? Mnpaul Aug 2013 #11
That's been going on for 20 years. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #13
how will I be legally informed ? quadrature Aug 2013 #12
There's a web page now that explains your obligations... PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #17
Or we could have Medicare for all Doctor_J Aug 2013 #14
Can someone answer a question? I don't know mainer Aug 2013 #15
No, but you may be eligible for a subsidy (tax credit) for your premium. PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #16

Supersedeas

(20,630 posts)
2. it's the IRS -- created to manufacture the necessity for professional accountants
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 09:25 PM
Aug 2013

just to interpret the rules

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
4. I'm not looking forward to this at all as a caseworker.
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 08:41 AM
Aug 2013

There are several things at issue here. It is not yet known just who may be eligible for subsidies, and if so what will that get them. There is the problem that most people have no idea what this law means for them. I did have a client ask me yesterday if she had to have insurance next year. I replied yes. If her employer does not provide it she will have the option of applying for medicaid, applying for a subsidy to buy from the exchange or seek the aid of navigators to purchase health insurance on the HBE. She was seriously worried about not being eligible for the aid, or the expanded medicaid we will be offering and thus leaving her to pay out of pocket for something she doesn't have the money for in the first place and if not may be assessed a penalty that could be deducted from her tax refund.

This law was supposed to help people, not harm them and I believe we will see these effects soon enough. Health insurance does not equate to health care. I have a health insurance through the state government I work for but unless I'm hit by something catastrophic is means little because I can't even afford the copay to get my allergy shots. How will a family making just enough to be over the subsidy bar not only pay out of pocket for health insurance much less actually be able to use it.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
7. Lost what battle?
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 08:53 PM
Aug 2013

The Supreme Court ruled that is was a tax. There has been no case that I know of regarding the unequal application of that tax.

And beyond that it is just stupid. Companies will dump workers off on temp agencies or keep them as temps to get out of paying for their healthcare. How can that be a good thing?

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
8. You mean like the progressive income tax system we have now?
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:07 PM
Aug 2013

Where people making more are tax at a greater percentage in theory?

A system that's been around a long, long time?

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
9. That isn't the same thing
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:12 PM
Aug 2013

The rate is equal for the same amount of income regardless of where you work.

itsrobert

(14,157 posts)
10. If I serve in a combat zone in the miltiary
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:16 PM
Aug 2013

I am exempt of income taxes. Please admit you are wrong and we will move on.

Mnpaul

(3,655 posts)
11. A military exemption?
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:23 PM
Aug 2013

More nonsense. All the military at that location get the same exemption no matter what their job is.

Please admit you sorry excuse for a heathcare plan is a joke and we can move on to something that works.

And how about the people you will be trapping in temp jobs? I guess you can't even address that one.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. That's been going on for 20 years.
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 08:33 AM
Aug 2013

Difference is under Obamacare there'll be affordable options available to temps etc that didn't exist before.

 

quadrature

(2,049 posts)
12. how will I be legally informed ?
Wed Aug 28, 2013, 09:40 PM
Aug 2013

of any obligations I have under Obamacare.
will I get something in the mail?

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
14. Or we could have Medicare for all
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 08:56 AM
Aug 2013

like the civilized countries. No law suits, no rejected claims, no 1-inch stacks of paper still piling up a year after your illness, no mountainous phone bills generated by trying to reach someone who can tell you why your acne medicine from 30 years ago disqualifies you from treatment. What fun would that be?

mainer

(12,022 posts)
15. Can someone answer a question? I don't know
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 09:04 AM
Aug 2013

Since paying for insurance is a mandated thing, and the IRS can penalize you for not getting it...

Does this mean we can deduct the cost of paying for that coverage from our income taxes?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IRS issues final rules on...