Parliamentary revolt (in the UK re. authorizing a Syria attack)
Source: UK Guardian
It appears that the parliamentary revolt that Cameron feared, to avoid which he agreed to wait for the UN chemical weapons report and hold a double vote, is happening anyway.
A remarkable wave of opposition to military strikes on Syria appears to be sweeping the British parliamentary debate this evening. The parliament is scheduled to hold a first vote on Syrian intervention at 10pm local time, in about 20 minutes.
Prime minister David Cameron had anticipated receiving the authorization he seeks in a second vote, to be held after the delivery of a UN weapons inspection report. But now some members are predicting there will not be a second vote on military action because "the numbers don't stake up", in the words of Conservative MP Edward Leigh.
Andrew has compiled a list of coalition MPs who have expressed skepticism about military intervention. Of course, expressing skepticism is very different from voting against the government.
Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/29/syria-crisis-iran-says-all-efforts-must-be-made-to-prevent-military-action-live
A parliamentary rebellion indeed.
LiberalEsto
(22,845 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,314 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)MPs vote 332 to 220 against Labour amendment on Syria intervention and will now vote on government motion.
edit - link was updated.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)Can't really blame anyone.
"Can't get fooled again."--- George W Bush
muriel_volestrangler
(101,314 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)That's us out of it at least for the time being. The money which would've been spent would be better invested in the NHS anyway.
Link to confirm here if of interest : http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-08-29/mps-vote-against-government-motion-on-syria/
Wheres our Congress?