Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,786 posts)
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:26 PM Aug 2013

U.S. Government Assessment of the Syrian Government’s Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21, 2013

Last edited Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:16 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: US Department of State

The United States Government assesses with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus suburbs on August 21, 2013. We further assess that the regime used a nerve agent in the attack. These all-source assessments are based on human, signals, and geospatial intelligence as well as a significant body of open source reporting.Our classified assessments have been shared with the U.S. Congress and key international partners. To protect sources and methods, we cannot publicly release all available intelligence – but what follows is an unclassified summary of the U.S. Intelligence Community’s analysis of what took place.

Syrian Government Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21

A large body of independent sources indicates that a chemical weapons attack took place in the Damascus suburbs on August 21. In addition to U.S. intelligence information, there are accounts from international and Syrian medical personnel; videos; witness accounts; thousands of social media reports from at least 12 different locations in the Damascus area; journalist accounts; and reports from highly credible nongovernmental organizations.

A preliminary U.S. government assessment determined that 1,429 people were killed in the chemical weapons attack, including at least 426 children, though this assessment will certainly evolve as we obtain more information.

We assess with high confidence that the Syrian government carried out the chemical weapons attack against opposition elements in the Damascus suburbs on August 21. We assess that the scenario in which the opposition executed the attack on August 21 is highly unlikely. The body of information used to make this assessment includes intelligence pertaining to the regime’s preparations for this attack and its means of delivery, multiple streams of intelligence about the attack itself and its effect, our post-attack observations, and the differences between the capabilities of the regime and the opposition. Our high confidence assessment is the strongest position that the U.S. Intelligence Community can take short of confirmation. We will continue to seek additional information to close gaps in our understanding of what took place.

Background:

The Syrian regime maintains a stockpile of numerous chemical agents, including mustard, sarin, and VX and has thousands of munitions that can be used to deliver chemical warfare agents.

Syrian President Bashar al-Asad is the ultimate decision maker for the chemical weapons program and members of the program are carefully vetted to ensure security and loyalty. The Syrian Scientific Studies and Research Center (SSRC) – which is subordinate to the Syrian Ministry of Defense – manages Syria’s chemical weapons program.

We assess with high confidence that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons on a small scale against the opposition multiple times in the last year, including in the Damascus suburbs. This assessment is based on multiple streams of information including reporting of Syrian officials planning and executing chemical weapons attacks and laboratory analysis of physiological samples obtained from a number of individuals, which revealed exposure to sarin. We assess that the opposition has not used chemical weapons.

The Syrian regime has the types of munitions that we assess were used to carry out the attack on August 21, and has the ability to strike simultaneously in multiple locations. We have seen no indication that the opposition has carried out a large-scale, coordinated rocket and artillery attack like the one that occurred on August 21.

We assess that the Syrian regime has used chemical weapons over the last year primarily to gain the upper hand or break a stalemate in areas where it has struggled to seize and hold strategically valuable territory. In this regard, we continue to judge that the Syrian regime views chemical weapons as one of many tools in its arsenal, including air power and ballistic missiles, which they indiscriminately use against the opposition.

The Syrian regime has initiated an effort to rid the Damascus suburbs of opposition forces using the area as a base to stage attacks against regime targets in the capital. The regime has failed to clear dozens of Damascus neighborhoods of opposition elements, including neighborhoods targeted on August 21, despite employing nearly all of its conventional weapons systems. We assess that the regime’s frustration with its inability to secure large portions of Damascus may have contributed to its decision to use chemical weapons on August 21.

Preparation:

We have intelligence that leads us to assess that Syrian chemical weapons personnel – including personnel assessed to be associated with the SSRC – were preparing chemical munitions prior to the attack. In the three days prior to the attack, we collected streams of human, signals and geospatial intelligence that reveal regime activities that we assess were associated with preparations for a chemical weapons attack.

Syrian chemical weapons personnel were operating in the Damascus suburb of ‘Adra from Sunday, August 18 until early in the morning on Wednesday, August 21 near an area that the regime uses to mix chemical weapons, including sarin. On August 21, a Syrian regime element prepared for a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus area, including through the utilization of gas masks. Our intelligence sources in the Damascus area did not detect any indications in the days prior to the attack that opposition affiliates were planning to use chemical weapons.

The Attack:

Multiple streams of intelligence indicate that the regime executed a rocket and artillery attack against the Damascus suburbs in the early hours of August 21. Satellite detections corroborate that attacks from a regime-controlled area struck neighborhoods where the chemical attacks reportedly occurred – including Kafr Batna, Jawbar, ‘Ayn Tarma, Darayya, and Mu’addamiyah. This includes the detection of rocket launches from regime controlled territory early in the morning, approximately 90 minutes before the first report of a chemical attack appeared in social media. The lack of flight activity or missile launches also leads us to conclude that the regime used rockets in the attack.

Local social media reports of a chemical attack in the Damascus suburbs began at 2:30 a.m. local time on August 21. Within the next four hours there were thousands of social media reports on this attack from at least 12 different locations in the Damascus area. Multiple accounts described chemical-filled rockets impacting opposition-controlled areas.

Three hospitals in the Damascus area received approximately 3,600 patients displaying symptoms consistent with nerve agent exposure in less than three hours on the morning of August 21, according to a highly credible international humanitarian organization. The reported symptoms, and the epidemiological pattern of events – characterized by the massive influx of patients in a short period of time, the origin of the patients, and the contamination of medical and first aid workers – were consistent with mass exposure to a nerve agent. We also received reports from international and Syrian medical personnel on the ground.

We have identified one hundred videos attributed to the attack, many of which show large numbers of bodies exhibiting physical signs consistent with, but not unique to, nerve agent exposure. The reported symptoms of victims included unconsciousness, foaming from the nose and mouth, constricted pupils, rapid heartbeat, and difficulty breathing. Several of the videos show what appear to be numerous fatalities with no visible injuries, which is consistent with death from chemical weapons, and inconsistent with death from small-arms, high-explosive munitions or blister agents. At least 12 locations are portrayed in the publicly available videos, and a sampling of those videos confirmed that some were shot at the general times and locations described in the footage.

We assess the Syrian opposition does not have the capability to fabricate all of the videos, physical symptoms verified by medical personnel and NGOs, and other information associated with this chemical attack.

We have a body of information, including past Syrian practice, that leads us to conclude that regime officials were witting of and directed the attack on August 21. We intercepted communications involving a senior official intimately familiar with the offensive who confirmed that chemical weapons were used by the regime on August 21 and was concerned with the U.N. inspectors obtaining evidence. On the afternoon of August 21, we have intelligence that Syrian chemical weapons personnel were directed to cease operations. At the same time, the regime intensified the artillery barrage targeting many of the neighborhoods where chemical attacks occurred. In the 24 hour period after the attack, we detected indications of artillery and rocket fire at a rate approximately four times higher than the ten preceding days. We continued to see indications of sustained shelling in the neighborhoods up until the morning of August 26.

To conclude, there is a substantial body of information that implicates the Syrian government’s responsibility in the chemical weapons attack that took place on August 21.As indicated, there is additional intelligence that remains classified because of sources and methods concerns that is being provided to Congress and international partners.

Read more: http://www.c-span.org/uploadedFiles/Content/Documents/USGassessmentonSyria%281%29.pdf

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

RGinNJ

(1,021 posts)
1. Ok I believe the Assad Government did use chemical weapons, however
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:38 PM
Aug 2013

where does this country get the right to do anything about it without the UN or any other type of world organization asking us to help.

 

John2

(2,730 posts)
9. I don't believe any of this garbage.
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:42 PM
Aug 2013

First of all, the claim the opposition does not have the capabilities to launch chemical attacks with missiles or artillery, just where did they get this assesment? Did they get it from the rebels, including Al Nusra, the Taliban or Al Qaeda. Did they get this from the mysterious Free Syrian Army?

Second of all, which rebel groups were they targeting within those neighborhoods. Is it the Obama or Israeli position, the Syrian Army just targeted neighborhoods of defense women and children? Did they even kill any of the rebels? What sources in the area are they claiming reported these targets and what medical facilities or Syrian doctors from Syria reported this, or are they all from across the borders?

There has to be fighters in the area for the Syrian Army to target, and if not, why wouldn't they just move in and control these areas? Why would these fighters from the Free Syrian Army put civilians within the line of fire?

This is the second time the Obama Administration and Israel has made such claims about intelligence. They are conflicting themselves. On one hand they claim they don't know where all these chemical facilities are located and in the next even, they make claims they do know. They are also making claims they are listening in on Syrian communications. If that is the case, then why are the Syrians so successful in carrying out suprised attacks on the rebels? If they did have such information, then why didn't they alert the Israelis about Syria moving equipment allegedly in Lakatia?
W would the Syrian Army carry out such an attack when they let inspectors in the country and right in Damascus? The Obama Administration also made the claims, the rebels had no means or capabilities to carry out other chemical attacks, but there is video from Russian journalists and eyewitness reports from civilians of such an attack through mortar fire which killed a number of civilians and Syrian soldiers earlier in Aleppo, yet the Obama Administration just well called Dela Ponte a liar.

The UN is headed by an official from South Korea, which is a staunch Ally of the U.S. The person heading the investigation team for the UN appointed by the head of the U.N. is a sunni Muslim. The U.N. has a history of clouding the evidence when it does not serve certain countries with influence interests, such as the Iran\Iraq War when Saddam used chemical weapons. A team was sent in to investigate but they determined they didn't know who used chemical weapons in that affair. We now know from history, certain countries had a lot of influence in the results. It turned out much later, when Saddam was no longer an Ally, he was the culprit and Iran had nothing to do with using Chemical weapons in that affair. Saddam's Allies was no other thanhe U.S., Britain, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, in his War with Iran.

The Iranians was on the verge of launching a huge offensive on the border. It was the U.S. fed the intelligence to Saddam and it was U.S. companies and the Saudis supplied Saddam with chemical weapons. They knew Saddam was going to use those weapons to prevent a massive Iranian assault. This is just a recycle of events. The Syrian Army is using conventional forces and have no need to defeat Al Nusra,the Taliban or Al Qaeda with chemical weapons. They have no need to massacre defenseless women and children with chemical weapons.

The Syrian Army also has an Amnesty program for Syrian civilians, but there is also clear and undisputed evidence the rebels want people to ignore. It is the terrorizing of innocent Syrian civilians that are loyalists to the Syrian Government. There has been clear evidence of mass graves in areas formerly controled by the rebels, such as Al Nusra, the Taliban and European Terrorists from countries such as Belgium and from Chechnya and Russia. There have also been Terrorist groups from Turkey,Tunisia, and Libya. Other countries with Terrorists entering Syria are from Iraq,Germany, Britain, Jordan, Lebanon,Egypt,Oatar and Saudi Arabia.

Does the U.S. wish people to ignore those obvious facts? There is also legitimate evidence of our CIA training thse groups in Turkey and Jordan to enter Syria. Put all the evidence on the table including all the so called evidence of killing innocent civilians to push one's cause. Lets have the evidence of bribery also from a certain Saudi Prince to overthrow a foreign government and the concealment of chemical weapons by a certain Prime minister in Turkey. Let all the sides testify at the U.N. in open and fair hearings which includes the victims of both sides, which includes Kurds, Christians and Alawites, other than only Sunni Muslims. There are alo questions for the Likud Government of Netanyahu and their inteference in the affairs of Syria. Lets have it all out in the open if our intelligence services can stomach the transparency.


Tx4obama

(36,974 posts)
16. The other attack, the napalm type attack, was from fighter jets
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 05:37 PM
Aug 2013

The rebels do not have fighter jets - but Assad does.

Caution: Graphic images

Video of some of the people that Assad's napalm type chemical burnt: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23892594

 

Arctic Dave

(13,812 posts)
2. So they are basing the majority of their assessment from Youtube?
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 02:39 PM
Aug 2013

Great. We know there was a chemical release. But it still doesn't say who did it.

A rocket and artillery barrage is not proof. For that matter, the rebels could have stockpiles and they were hit by the barrage.

Where are the shell that were used or the rockets?

 

The_Casual_Observer

(27,742 posts)
5. I have high confidence that all of this intelligence comes from bullshit sources that would
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 03:11 PM
Aug 2013

somehow profit from the war.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
11. They watched them roll in rocket launchers over a 3 day period!
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 04:58 PM
Aug 2013

Why didn't they warn the people? Why didn't they strike the rocket launchers? Are the 'unnamed sources' the same people selling Syria the chemical weapons?

Our "Intelligence gathers" could have saved those people.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
17. What the State Dept report does NOT establish: command responsibility for a chemical weapons attack
Fri Aug 30, 2013, 06:15 PM
Aug 2013

You have to read this document for what it does not contain: any specific information, or reference to specific information, that in any way ties officials at the Minister of Defense or higher level in the planning and execution of this attack. What it does say is that the the Syrian Minister of Defense upon learning of the attack ordered it to cease.

Furthermore, the specific information provided by other sources shows that the Minister of Defense personally spoke with the unit commander after the attack, and the Minister is characterized as being panicked by the news he receives. Foreign Policy’s magazine The Cable reported on August 27: http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/08/27/exclusive_us_spies_say_intercepted_calls_prove_syrias_army_used_nerve_gas

Last Wednesday, in the hours after a horrific chemical attack east of Damascus, an official at the Syrian Ministry of Defense exchanged panicked phone calls with a leader of a chemical weapons unit, demanding answers for a nerve agent strike that killed more than 1,000 people. Those conversations were overheard by U.S. intelligence services, The Cable has learned. And that is the major reason why American officials now say they’re certain that the attacks were the work of the Bashar al-Assad regime — and why the U.S. military is likely to attack that regime in a matter of days.”


That report goes on to express the uncertainties that have arisen in assigning culpability for the incident:

But the intercept raises questions about culpability for the chemical massacre, even as it answers others: Was the attack on Aug. 21 the work of a Syrian officer overstepping his bounds? Or was the strike explicitly directed by senior members of the Assad regime? "It's unclear where control lies," one U.S. intelligence official told The Cable. "Is there just some sort of general blessing to use these things? Or are there explicit orders for each attack?"

Nor are U.S. analysts sure of the Syrian military's rationale for launching the strike -- if it had a rationale at all. Perhaps it was a lone general putting a long-standing battle plan in motion; perhaps it was a miscalculation by the Assad government. Whatever the reason, the attack has triggered worldwide outrage, and put the Obama administration on the brink of launching a strike of its own in Syria. "We don't know exactly why it happened," the intelligence official added. "We just know it was pretty fucking stupid."


The UK National Post-Telegraph reflected that assessment that there is no certainty as whether this attack was ordered from above or the unauthorized work of a lower-ranking officer in the field:http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/08/28/intercepted-phone-call-helped-convince-u-s-that-syrian-regime-was-responsible-for-deadly-chemical-attack/

A report about the new evidence was published on Foreign Policy, an international affairs website, as President Barack Obama announced that the United States has “concluded” that the Syrian government carried out a deadly chemical weapons attack on civilians. Yet U.S. intelligence officials say questions remain about whether it was an officially sanctioned attack or the work of an over-zealous officer.

The intercepted message does not conclusively establish who gave the order to use chemical weapons and could mean it was a mistake, analysts suggested.


Furthermore, another factor to consider is the accuracy of the assessments that have been produced. the source of the key intercepts was IDF Unit 8200, the Israeli NSA. This is from a report the following day in The Guardian (08/28): http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/28/israeli-intelligence-intercepted-syria-chemical-talk

The bulk of evidence proving the Assad regime's deployment of chemical weapons – which would provide legal grounds essential to justify any western military action – has been provided by Israeli military intelligence, the German magazine Focus has reported.

The 8200 unit of the Israeli Defence Forces, which specialises in electronic surveillance, intercepted a conversation between Syrian officials regarding the use of chemical weapons, an unnamed former Mossad official told Focus. The content of the conversation was relayed to the US, the ex-official said.

The 8200 unit collects and analyses electronic data, including wiretapped telephone calls and emails. It is the largest unit in the IDF.

Israel has invested in intelligence assets in Syria for decades, according to a senior government official. "We have an historic intelligence effort in the field, for obvious reasons," he said.

Israel and the US had a "close and co-operative relationship in the intelligence field", he added, but declined to comment specifically on the Focus report.

Senior Israeli security officials arrived in Washington on Monday to share the latest results of intelligence-gathering, and to review the Syrian crisis with national security adviser Susan Rice.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Government Assessmen...