G20 members fail to heal rift over Syria
Source: France24
Syria was the main topic of discussion during a dinner at the G20 summit in St Petersburg on Thursday. But with the forum going into its final day, there is no sign that world leaders are any closer to resolving their differences over the issue.
.../
US President Barack Obama had arrived for the summit on Thursday with the hope of winning support for armed strikes against the regime of Syrian President Bashar-al Assad following his alleged use of chemical weapons.
The US, France and Turkey are currently the only G20 members to commit to using force in Syria. Russia and China strongly oppose military action, while a host of other countries remain concerned about supporting military strikes without a UN resolution.
The G20s formal programme for the St Petersburg summit centres around the global economy, but as tensions over the Syrian conflict threatened to torpedo discussions on other issues, host Russian President Vladimir Putin made a last-minute announcement for participants to air their views over dinner on Thursday evening.
Read more: http://www.france24.com/en/20130906-g20-members-fail-heal-rift-over-syria
How will this lack of G20 cohesion affect the vote in Congress? Let's hope it weighs heavily in their deliberations. Surely, the fact that even the UK has backed off, is a sign that direct military action is not the way to go.
delrem
(9,688 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)Yes.
A number of other states called against the depreciation of the international law and to remember that only the UN Security Council has the right to make decisions on the use of force, he said...
/... http://en.rian.ru/politics/20130906/183198254/Syria-Issue-Divides-Leaders-at-G20-Summit---Putin-Spokesman.html
Brazil, India and South Africa also worry that intervention would do economic harm, according to Mr Putin's officials.
Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Russian president, said the leaders of the large emerging economies spoke before the St Petersburg summit and agreed that Syrian intervention would have an "extremely negative effect" on the global economy."
While the British and French governments have both backed the principle of military intervention to punish the Assad regime's alleged use of chemical weapons, the European Union as a whole is opposed, European officials said...
/more... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10289837/Syria-crisis-Barack-Obama-faces-growing-opposition-to-airstrikes-as-he-arrives-for-G20.html
[center]
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/06/syria-crisis-splits-g20-live [/center]
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Ghost Dog
(16,881 posts)don't you think?
Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)Surya Gayatri
(15,445 posts)Sad that Carlin's voice is no longer out there fighting for right.
Rebellious Republican
(5,029 posts)another_liberal
(8,821 posts)We have no coalition. France and Turkey, my ass! We will be going it alone, and that is a recipe for disaster in a war which could easily spread across the entire Middle East.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I'd like to add an update to this story:
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon warned Friday that an "ill-considered" strike on Syria could have "tragic consequences" for the strife-torn country, as President Barack Obama continued lobbying efforts for military action at the G-20 summit.
Speaking at an event on the sidelines of meetings in St. Petersburg, Russia, Ban called on world powers to put aside their differences over the Syrian conflict, and to take concerted action to get desperately needed aid to the population. This is a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented proportions in recent history, he said, adding that a missile strike could lead to an increased threat of further sectarian violence.