NSA Lawyer: Phone Surveillance Uses Stop-and-Frisk Standards
Last edited Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:40 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: NEWSMAX
Intelligence officials say National Security Agency workers follow the same standards in accessing phone surveillance data as those guiding law enforcement's stop-and-frisk policy,The Hill reports.
NSA workers have to demonstrate "reasonable and articulable suspicion" when they want to troll through specific information that's part of NSA's massive data collection on all U.S. calls.
"Its effectively the same standard as stop-and-risk," NSA General Counsel Rajesh De said Monday during a hearing held by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which supervises anti-terrorism surveillance programs.
New York City police say stop-and-frisk is an effective crime-prevention tool, but a federal judge ruled the strategy amounted to "indirect racial profiling" and ordered reforms. That ruling has since been blocked by an appeals court....
Read more: http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/nsa-surveillance-stop-frisk/2013/11/04/id/534750
Original article from The Hill:
Intelligence officials say National Security Agency workers follow the same standards in accessing phone surveillance data as those guiding law enforcement's stop-and-frisk policy, The Hill reports.
NSA workers have to demonstrate "reasonable and articulable suspicion" when they want to troll through specific information that's part of NSA's massive data collection on all U.S. calls.
"Its effectively the same standard as stop-and-risk," NSA General Counsel Rajesh De said Monday during a hearing held by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, which supervises anti-terrorism surveillance programs.
New York City police say stop-and-frisk is an effective crime-prevention tool, but a federal judge ruled the strategy amounted to "indirect racial profiling" and ordered reforms. That ruling has since been blocked by an appeals court...
http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/189141-phone-data-surveillance-like-%E2%80%98stop-and-frisk%E2%80%99-intelligence-officials
christx30
(6,241 posts)Indi Guy
(3,992 posts)OK, empty your pockets.
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Th1onein
(8,514 posts)It's not a matter of looking through it, once they have it. It's a matter of taking it in the first place.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)They are constantly trying to portray the mass collection of data as a given and focus the controversy on what happens afterward, as though the Fourth Amendment did not even exist.
They are corporate fascists using our tax dollars to create and justify a criminal surveillance state.
How on earth can anyone believe there is nothing amiss with our government having detailed dossiers on every man woman and child? Can they not see the power and control this grants the government over our lives and the inherent potential for abuse therein?
Fucking bizarre.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)from The Hill instead of Newsmax, please?
Let's not give traffic to the crazies.
Response to Kelvin Mace (Reply #5)
Indi Guy This message was self-deleted by its author.