Outside groups coalescing around Hillary Clinton
Source: AP
Outside groups coalescing around Hillary Clinton
KEN THOMAS, ASSOCIATED PRESS
"">
FILE - This Sept. 10, 2013 file photo shows former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaking after receiving the Liberty Medal during a ceremony at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. As Hillary Rodham Clinton privately weighs a second White House run, pieces of the Democratic establishment are beginning to fall into place publicly to help a possible candidacy. Several super political action committees are collectively acting as a de facto campaign organization to ensure she's ready to compete aggressively if she decides to try again to become the first woman president. The honor is given annually to an individual who displays courage and conviction while striving to secure liberty for people worldwide. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke, File)(Credit: AP)
WASHINGTON (AP) As Hillary Rodham Clinton weighs a second White House run, pieces of the Democratic establishment are beginning to fall into place to help a possible candidacy.
Several super political action committees are helping with early efforts to ensure Clinton is ready to compete aggressively if she decides to try again to become the first female president.
The super PAC American Bridge 21st Century recently launched Correct the Record, a project to defend the former secretary of state and other potential 2016 candidates against Republican critics.
Priorities USA Action, the super PAC that promoted President Barack Obamas re-election, is considering a reconfiguration that could boost Clinton.
###
Read more: http://www.salon.com/2013/11/18/outside_groups_coalescing_around_hillary_clinton/
msongs
(67,405 posts)blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)brooklynite
(94,540 posts)17 million Democrats supported Hillary in 2008, and another 17 million supported Obama, who a lot of progressives here seem to think was just as bad. Maybe this isn't the Party for you.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Party and not this shit. She makes me tired looking at her. Bill will be there meddling. Sigh ...
Cal33
(7,018 posts)Dems. win both the Senate and the House next year?
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)underpants
(182,799 posts)I get the energy about Elizabeth Warren and Bernie but that isn't going to happen.
President Clinton - it is her's if she wants it. And she wants it.
Just saying.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)are unelectable in a general election.
They would simply be feel good candidates but I'd rather see Hillary as president than Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio or any one of the other repukes.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)it's Hillary's if she wants it. At this point in time, I think, anyone else talking about running or being urged to run, is Vice Presidential material. Note, I said at this time., which means; barring some dramatic action to cause otherwise; this is Hillary's.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)Hillary will be the nominee. The last time, Clinton was impacted by a dramatic event that is, today, addressed as Mr. President. I don't see anyone out there with that sort of impact, at this time
underpants
(182,799 posts)Both the ps and the press. I remember when Hillary announced she had (something like) $36M - game over, get ready for the general election.....and then Obama announced that he had over $40M. Mouths were agape on TV. Where/ who did he get that money?!?!? Then they found out it was from tiny donations and big donors that the Clinton campaign thought were exclusive to them. Obama got his shoulders in front and lasted to the end of the primary race.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Want has nothing to do with it.
She has to earn it like anybody else. Is she runs I hope that she has a healthy set of challengers that will debate her on issues.
underpants
(182,799 posts)Are almost unbeatable. Add in Hillary's name recognition, the army of women who will work on this campaign, and her experience make this almost impossible for the Repubs to come up with anyone viable.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)Earth_First
(14,910 posts)Even here at DemocraticUnderground, she's the candidate you are expected to support...
William769
(55,146 posts)DonViejo
(60,536 posts)grantcart
(53,061 posts)We have never done very well at 'falling in'.
And that's a good thing, even if it causes a certain degree of heartburn.
cosmicone
(11,014 posts)I am doing it of my own free will.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)One would have thought that she belonged to a different party.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Yay!
She's inevitable! Just like last time!
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)all sorts of crap around her neck, then fix the election. It will be claimed that people "rejected the Democratic ideas". No, thank you.
I'm currently advocating for Warren, despite the admonishments that "she is more useful where she is". Sanders is my first choice, so I'm reserving the right to switch camps, depending on how things shape up.
All of this is moot, however, as I have also noted the admonishments from some that any talk of anything other than 2014 amounts to being a troll.
There, I feel better.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)adirondacker
(2,921 posts)Oh yeah, just a little to the right.
Nudge onward third way!
brooklynite
(94,540 posts)Maybe you could organize to get him drafted?
Of course that would require actual work.....
adirondacker
(2,921 posts)I've worked on campaigns, on the ground, on the phones, and in the polling stations for Democrats.
I'm too impoverished to do any organizing at present, and my life situation is Not pleasant at the moment (like many others). Though the tide may change...and I'll probably commit to a Sanders ticket.
Thanks for the advice though.
Android3.14
(5,402 posts)The money is already moving? I'd hoped they'd keep the suspense elevated until we could buy t-shirts.
R. Daneel Olivaw
(12,606 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Sognefjord
(229 posts)Is going to hell in a handbasket always this predictable and agonizingly slow?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I'm not sure you want to hear the long answer.
Sognefjord
(229 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)feels like a tacit admission that the voters won't want that candidate unless he/she has been heavily packaged and marketed.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)That will be a big factor in who gets elected in 2016.
I'd vote for her over any GOPer, but I still can't see that she'll win over the same people Obama did.