Issa Fishes For Proof Obama Knew He Lied About Obamacare
Source: TPM
DYLAN SCOTT DECEMBER 2, 2013, 6:41 PM EST
House Oversight Chair Darrell Issa (R-CA) sent letters Wednesday to 15 insurance companies demanding copies of their correspondence with the Obama administration in an effort to determine if the administration knew in advance that people could lose access to their doctors or have their existing health insurance policies canceled under Obamacare.
The letters were sent to major insurance companies -- Aetna, Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Humana, Kaiser Permanente, UnitedHealth Group among them. Issa asks for a response by Dec. 13.
Issa is looking for a few pieces of information. Did insurance companies know that the president would say that Americans could keep their health plan or their provider? Did they inform the administration that some plans would be canceled or provider networks changed? Did they object to that characterization?
He also asked for "all ... communications" between company employees and members of the Obama administration since the Affordable Care Act was signed into law in March 2010. There is another request for interactions between insurance company employees about the accuracy of Obama's "keep your doctor" pledge.
Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/issa-obamacare-letter-insurance-companies
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)p.s...Talk about "over reaching government"! AND more wasting of tax payer dollars.
Guess TeaPukes, that hate those things, love those things...will ABC, CBS, CNN, etc. cover the over reach?
Sure.
BeyondGeography
(39,370 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Regardless of how anyone does or doesn't feel about Obama, this is a waste of time.
They would only hurt themselves if they tried to impeach him; and I think they know that. So, what's the point of trying to discredit a president who cannot run again anyway?
madokie
(51,076 posts)thats what they're working on.
they'll treat the first woman president the same way they've treated Obama too and for the same reason.
merrily
(45,251 posts)So, they can probably give that a rest.
Not so sure about the "of color" part, though. That takes in a lot of territory, including Asian Americans and Cuban Americans whom the right seem to love (and vice versa).
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)civil war. Another black national leader would be welcome by the majority and as long as we can fend off the Republican kill plans for our democracy and another person of color should be elected president again and soon.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Time he took possession of them. The GOP must be desperate when they even allowed Issa to be on the oversight committee. So far he has only been successful at blowing smoke.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)until, and unless something real comes along. I will say that Obama had to know that some doctors would not take the new plan their patient got because they switched insurance companies. You would think that they would have known that with all of the changes required by the Affordable Care Act that some policies would be canceled.
Having said that, so what? Big deal. It still is a vast improvement in coverage and protections for almost everyone. Can we improve upon it, certainly! Will Issa move to try to Impeach Obama, certainly! He is a shit-head!
George II
(67,782 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)and attempts to cover the truth.
George II
(67,782 posts)Deep13
(39,154 posts)aggiesal
(8,914 posts)Even if Obama lied,
what crime did he commit?
I'm sure Issa lies more in 1 day
then Obama has in his career.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Was it in the SOTU address?
Did we go to war over it?
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)with that woman . . . under oath.
Obama was not under oath.
If Issa were to prosecute every politician that told
a little white lie, Issa would be first in line.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)Therefore, I call on Mr. Issa to investigate himself.
I also call on Issa's constituents in Vista, California, to find a more suitable person to represent them in Congress.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..or the whole election was just to get him out of town.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Cha
(297,188 posts)real work in the House of Rep.
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)increase the deficit with his bullshit witch hunts! I think he might even top Mitch as the most disgusting POS in Washington.
trusty elf
(7,391 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
Skittles
(153,159 posts)TrollBuster9090
(5,954 posts)That way, every time something F#%ks up, he can't claim he didn't have advanced notice.
madrchsod
(58,162 posts)he`ll subpoena they and they`ll send their lawyers to stonewall. by that time congress will be on summer recess.
cynzke
(1,254 posts)Having to turn over private correspondence that might prove embarrassing to insurance companies and pulled in to testify in a televised hearing. Not only will they not cooperate and have to be subpoenaed, bet there will be a whole lot of hollering behind scenes demanding the plug be pulled on this investigation.
Dopers_Greed
(2,640 posts)Why hasn't Daryl Arsonist been voted out yet? Is he in a gerrymandered district?
Tommy_Carcetti
(43,181 posts)....IN THE BASEMENT!!!!
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)And y'all have been my best group ever.... no really.....
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)Even if and it's a big if the President did lie intentionally what they want to impeach him for lying
zonkers
(5,865 posts)mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)ashling
(25,771 posts)Remember - when he raised taxes anyway - all the subpoenas for all correspondence between Bush's lips to find out what they really said
merrily
(45,251 posts)But, because of the poor lip reading skills of Republicans, Ross Perot had to run.
ashling
(25,771 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Even if he knew he was lying, what law was broken? Is it treason? Issa is the bottom of the barrel of scum as far as I'm concerned. He should have been a loan-shark.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I mean, we pay his salary and let him live like an emperor for 8 years and you don't think we deserve truth from a POTUS?
That is a bridge too far for me.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
EC This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)I'm gonna guess ZERO
yurbud
(39,405 posts)We got a decade of investigations into Bill Clinton's consensual sex life, but no Republicans cared to ask why a gay hooker posed as a reporter, and in addition to lobbing softball questions at Bush during his press conference, checked in when there were no press events and didn't check out.
mitty14u2
(1,015 posts)Law For Change - Section 501 (c) (4) exemption "Exclusivly"
A nonprofit corporation or nonprofit LLC (state law permitting) that is organized exclusively for the promotion of social welfare may obtain a federal income tax exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. Exemption under this section will not give donors a charitable deduction but it may enable the organization to avoid the restrictions of private foundation status and the restrictions on lobbying.
http://www.lawforchange.org/lfc/Section_501_(c)_(4)_exemption.asp
Issa opened acan of worms "Exclusivly" on this one!