Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,527 posts)
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 04:24 PM Dec 2013

Attorney: Ga. soldier charged in killings has PTSD

Source: Associated Press

Attorney: Ga. soldier charged in killings has PTSD
By RUSS BYNUM, Associated Press | December 6, 2013 | Updated: December 6, 2013 1:24pm

LUDOWICI, Ga. (AP) — An Army sergeant charged with shooting a teenage girl in the head while another soldier killed her boyfriend outside Fort Stewart two years ago suffers from brain injuries and post-traumatic stress after serving in combat in Afghanistan, the sergeant's defense attorney said Friday.

Sgt. Anthony Peden, 27, faces a possible death sentence if he's convicted of murder in the Dec. 4, 2011, slayings in Long County. Prosecutors say former soldier Michael Roark and his girlfriend, 17-year-old Tiffany York, were shot to protect an anti-government militia group formed by disgruntled soldiers from Fort Stewart in southeast Georgia.

Burt Baxter, an attorney for Peden, told a Superior Court judge Friday that the accused soldier has undergone psychiatric evaluations in preparation for his defense. He said Peden suffered traumatic brain injuries while serving in the Korangol Valley of Afghanistan.

"The treatment that he needs for his post-traumatic stress would be better served in a military prison," said Baxter, who told the judge he's asked the military to reconsider a possible court-martial for Peden.

The Army dropped all military charges related to the slayings last year, leaving it to civilian authorities to prosecute the case.


Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Attorney-Ga-soldier-charged-in-killings-has-PTSD-5041648.php

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Attorney: Ga. soldier charged in killings has PTSD (Original Post) Judi Lynn Dec 2013 OP
Why would the Army not prosecute this? Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #1
No. atreides1 Dec 2013 #3
Even if the crime is committed against another person in the military? Blue_Tires Dec 2013 #4
Also the issue of double jeopardy. happyslug Dec 2013 #7
A big issue is the outrageousness of the crime jmowreader Dec 2013 #6
PTSD tazkcmo Dec 2013 #2
Oh how kind of them dsteve01 Dec 2013 #5
"Your Honor, I would like to call to the stand, Aristus Dec 2013 #8

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
3. No.
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 04:45 PM
Dec 2013

In some cases when a crime is committed by a member of the military off base...the military will turn it over to the civilian authorities to prosecute!

But the military can still court martial the defendants!

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
4. Even if the crime is committed against another person in the military?
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 04:49 PM
Dec 2013

Well, I see the victim was a "former" soldier, so that probably makes all the difference...

 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
7. Also the issue of double jeopardy.
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 11:02 PM
Dec 2013

I do NOT know Georgia law, but many states have held that if someone is tried for Murder in a Federal Court on a Federal Charge of some sort of Federal murder crime, to re-try him or her again in a State Court is Double Jeopardy.

On the other hand the Federal Courts have always said Double Jeopardy only kicks in if the crime is the same, and Murder in a State, and the various Federal Murder Statures are two different crimes issued by two different jurisdiction. i.e. If the Jury is the State Trial should rule the Defendant Not Guilty, the Federal Government could then pick up the case and try him or her again for violating any applicable Federal Law on that Murder.

Another angle is in a Court Martial you get a Jury that not only can decided the facts of the case, but can ask questions. In Civilian Courts Juries do NOT ask questions. Another difference is Military Juries are made of Officers, all not losing any pay for being on the Jury. In the case of a Civilian Jury, you are looking at 12 people not smart enough to get out of Jury Duty (and one side affect of this is Civilian Juries want to convict, the same is NOT true of Military juries).

Thus these two reasons, AND that is saves the Military Money by NOT having a Trial, explains why the Military declined to prosecute.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
6. A big issue is the outrageousness of the crime
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 07:19 PM
Dec 2013

Civilians think quite often the military is lenient on troops who commit crimes against civilians. So if the offense is severe enough, the civil authorities will demand jurisdiction.

The truth is somewhat different: the military justice system will screw your ass to the wall because the head prosecutor on base is rated by the base commander, who can end your career for any or no reason.

dsteve01

(312 posts)
5. Oh how kind of them
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 05:03 PM
Dec 2013

They left the litigation tab for the local taxpayer instead of the federal taxpayer. They didn't have the political will to treat soldiers before they are pushed back into civilian life.

This is another example of the Military ignoring the PTSD epidemic. I wish there was something more that could be done--it all just seems so needless.

Aristus

(66,340 posts)
8. "Your Honor, I would like to call to the stand,
Fri Dec 6, 2013, 11:06 PM
Dec 2013

every service member with PTSD who didn't commit murder..."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Attorney: Ga. soldier cha...