Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 01:39 PM Mar 2012

GOP To Challenge Kerrey's Voter Registration

Source: KETV Omaha

OMAHA, Neb. -- Republican party leaders are questioning whether Bob Kerrey really can vote in Nebraska.

Earlier this week, the former Nebraska governor and U.S. Senator came home to the Cornhusker State from New York and filed to run for Senate shortly after he registered to vote in Nebraska.

While registering at the Douglas County Election Commission office, Kerrey listed his sister's address in Omaha as his place of residence.

State GOP chairman Jordan McGrain said Saturday that his group will submit a letter Monday challenging Kerrey's registration.


Read more: http://www.ketv.com/politics/30602221/detail.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
2. Kerrey
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 02:08 PM
Mar 2012

They must think he will be competive In general election.If they thought he would be easy to beat they wouldn't bother.

OmahaBlueDog

(10,000 posts)
12. Kerrey will force them to spend to get the seat
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:46 PM
Mar 2012

The Republicans have three candidates, but barring something completely unforeseen (like a scandal or the entry of Dave Heinnemann into the race), the GOP winner will be Jon Bruning. He's the AG, and the Republicans have been grooming him for three years. The cupboard is pretty bare on the Dem side. With the Departure of Ben Nelson, there aren't many well-known names besides Kerrey. Chuck Hassebrook appeared to be the Dem nominee in Kerrey's absence, and he's a relative unknown.

Kerrey doesn't gurantee victory, but ensures a competitive race. In his absence, the GOP wins this one in a slam-dunk, and spends very little money to do so.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
3. Perhaps we should ask "Wyoming" resident Dick Cheney about this.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 02:10 PM
Mar 2012

If Dick really wasn't from Wyoming because he lived and worked in Texas, then that means the Republicans violated the Constitution by running a candidate and running mate from the same state.

Yet somehow all that didn't matter.

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
5. What?
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 04:17 PM
Mar 2012

This is news to me. Am I the only person here that doesn't know about the part of the Constitution that prohibits the President and Vice President from being residents of the same state?

sadbear

(4,340 posts)
7. Ok. Looked it up for myself.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 04:33 PM
Mar 2012

It seems that they can technically run, but can't get their home state's electoral votes. Is that about right?

harmonicon

(12,008 posts)
13. Well, that's interesting.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:46 PM
Mar 2012

It's just one of those things that I remember learning in school - I've never thought to look it up in the constitution.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
15. Correct, two Texans can run, but no Texas elector can vote for both of them.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 10:04 PM
Mar 2012

If the ticket wins enough electoral votes elsewhere, then it doesn't matter.

If the election is close enough that they both need Texas's electoral votes, however, then it does matter, which is why Cheney had to make the fraudulent change of residence.

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
17. Sorry for the Constitutional drive-by.
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 01:45 PM
Mar 2012

I should have cited it:

Amendment XII

The electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate;

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
18. No prohibition - just that they can't get the electoral votes from that state
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 02:04 PM
Mar 2012

In Bush's case, eliminating Texas would have made him the loser.

HeiressofBickworth

(2,682 posts)
14. The Supreme Court
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:54 PM
Mar 2012

ruled that Cheney was a resident of Wyoming, although he lived, worked, had a Texas drivers license and paid taxes in Texas. When that happened, I wasn't at all surprised that this same court later appointed Bush. We already had evidence that the fix was already in.

elleng

(130,974 posts)
4. The 'rules,' such as they are.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 02:23 PM
Mar 2012

First sentence/paragraph is confusing.

'Earlier this week, Douglas County Election Commissioner Dave Phipps said candidates must be registered to vote in order to file for office, but the rules are different for residents.

"The requirements for U.S. Senate are in the Constitution, and basically, they say you have to be a resident of the state when you take office, so it wouldn't be until next year when he would take office that that would have to be done," Phipps said.'

underpants

(182,830 posts)
10. Right - Hillary (IIRC) had to become a resident of NY before she took office as a Senator
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 04:55 PM
Mar 2012

If I remember correctly she was not actually a resident when she won the election. I could be wrong about that though.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP To Challenge Kerrey's...