Anti-Ahmadinejad Faction Wins Big in Iran Elections
Source: NEWSER
(Newser) In a battle of conservative hardliners versus conservative hardliners in Iran's elections on Friday, the winners were ... the conservative hardliners.
But in this case, it is the conservatives opposed to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who appear to have come out on top, taking upward of 80% of the seats in Iran's parliamentary elections, according to one anti-Ahmadinejad hardliner. Ahmadinejad's defeat was so thorough that even his sister, running in her family's home region, lost her bid (which one analyst saw as a "possible sign of fraud." .
MORE...
Read more: http://www.newser.com/story/141005/anti-ahmadinejad-faction-wins-big-in-iran-elections.html
the_chinuk
(332 posts)
because it's the mullahs above him who have the final say and are the real brains of the country.
But, hey, the Iranian President does work to draw critical fire, so there's that, anyway.
MADem
(135,425 posts)games even began.
Anyone who thinks Iran's leadership is legitimately elected is smoking crack....
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)done without the grace and favor of the head guy in charge. He can't spend money independently or order the military around without approval, and if he goes too far spies will tattle on him. He's rather hamstrung, but he is a despicable little puppet of the ayatullahs nonetheless.
Turbineguy
(37,346 posts)is a relic from the Bush years when they needed somebody crazy enough to equal Dubja.
Sabayon65
(29 posts)Ahmadinejad's party, the Alliance of Builders of Islamic Iran, is part of the conservative coalition that loosely includes the United Front of Conservatives and Monotheism and Justice Party. Ahmadinejad himself won't be up for election this term as there is a two-term limit for the President. This would be like saying that "an anti-Bush faction" won in the 2010 elections.
This does not necessarily signal a big change for Iran.